vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of LANDMARK BANCORP INC (LARK) and RxSight, Inc. (RXST). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
RxSight, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($32.6M vs $18.8M, roughly 1.7× LANDMARK BANCORP INC). LANDMARK BANCORP INC runs the higher net margin — 27.0% vs -28.1%, a 55.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, LANDMARK BANCORP INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.0% vs -18.9%). Over the past eight quarters, LANDMARK BANCORP INC's revenue compounded faster (13.1% CAGR vs 5.1%).
Landmark Bancorp Inc is a U.S.-based bank holding company operating Landmark National Bank, primarily serving communities across Kansas. It provides a full range of personal and commercial banking services including deposit accounts, residential mortgages, commercial loans, and wealth management solutions, catering to individual consumers, small businesses and local mid-sized enterprises.
RxSight, Inc. is a medical technology company focused on developing and commercializing innovative intraocular lens solutions for patients undergoing cataract and refractive lens exchange procedures. Its flagship Light Adjustable Lens allows post-surgery power adjustment via a dedicated light delivery device, serving global ophthalmology care markets to improve post-operative visual outcomes for patients.
LARK vs RXST — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $18.8M | $32.6M |
| Net Profit | $5.1M | $-9.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | 77.5% |
| Operating Margin | — | -34.8% |
| Net Margin | 27.0% | -28.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 14.0% | -18.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 7.8% | -54.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.22 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $18.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $18.7M | $32.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.2M | $30.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.3M | $33.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.5M | $37.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.8M | $40.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.9M | $35.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.7M | $34.9M |
| Q1 26 | $5.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.7M | $-9.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.9M | $-9.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.4M | $-11.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.7M | $-8.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3M | $-5.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.9M | $-6.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.0M | $-6.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 77.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 79.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 74.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 74.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 71.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 71.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 69.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 31.7% | -34.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.4% | -40.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 30.9% | -41.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 34.7% | -28.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.2% | -21.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.3% | -26.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.5% | -23.9% |
| Q1 26 | 27.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 32.1% | -28.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.1% | -32.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.4% | -35.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.5% | -21.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.5% | -14.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.8% | -17.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.5% | -17.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.66 | $-0.22 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.85 | $-0.24 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.75 | $-0.29 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.81 | $-0.20 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.47 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.68 | $-0.16 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.52 | $-0.16 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $31.9M | $228.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $275.7M |
| Total Assets | $1.6B | $311.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $31.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $228.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $227.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $227.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $229.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $237.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $237.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $233.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $160.6M | $275.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $155.7M | $276.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $148.4M | $278.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $142.7M | $279.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $136.2M | $281.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $139.7M | $277.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $128.3M | $275.2M |
| Q1 26 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $311.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $308.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $309.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $313.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $318.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $310.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $305.5M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-1.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-2.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -6.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-19.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $21.6M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.3M | $-1.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $439.0K | $-4.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.0M | $-8.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.2M | $-4.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.1M | $650.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.4M | $-4.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $21.0M | $-2.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.1M | $-1.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $354.0K | $-5.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.0M | $-9.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.9M | $-5.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.8M | $-453.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.8M | $-5.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 112.5% | -6.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 55.4% | -5.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.0% | -17.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 48.4% | -24.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 75.6% | -12.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 49.3% | -1.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.6% | -15.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.2% | 3.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.5% | 4.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.3% | 1.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.7% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.8% | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.2% | 4.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.56× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.09× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.10× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.71× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.34× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.06× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.45× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LARK
Segment breakdown not available.
RXST
| Rxlal | $28.2M | 86% |
| LDD | $3.0M | 9% |
| Service Warranty Service Contracts And Accessories | $1.5M | 4% |
