vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of LANDMARK BANCORP INC (LARK) and Snail, Inc. (SNAL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Snail, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($25.1M vs $18.8M, roughly 1.3× LANDMARK BANCORP INC). LANDMARK BANCORP INC runs the higher net margin — 27.0% vs -3.4%, a 30.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, LANDMARK BANCORP INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.0% vs -4.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Snail, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (33.4% CAGR vs 13.1%).
Landmark Bancorp Inc is a U.S.-based bank holding company operating Landmark National Bank, primarily serving communities across Kansas. It provides a full range of personal and commercial banking services including deposit accounts, residential mortgages, commercial loans, and wealth management solutions, catering to individual consumers, small businesses and local mid-sized enterprises.
Suzhou Snail Digital Technology Co., Ltd., doing business as Snail, is a Chinese video game company and a Virtual Network Operator headquartered in Suzhou, China, which has branches Snail Games and Snail Mobile. Its division, Snail USA, markets Snail Games products in North America, South America, & Europe. Snail Games products include massively multiplayer online (MMOs), real-time strategy (RTS), and casual games. Its global registered user base has reached over 70 million accounts. The U.S....
LARK vs SNAL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $18.8M | $25.1M |
| Net Profit | $5.1M | $-862.2K |
| Gross Margin | — | 38.3% |
| Operating Margin | — | -6.0% |
| Net Margin | 27.0% | -3.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 14.0% | -4.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 7.8% | -177.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $18.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $18.7M | $25.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.2M | $13.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.3M | $22.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.5M | $20.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.8M | $26.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.9M | $22.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.7M | $21.6M |
| Q1 26 | $5.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.7M | $-862.2K | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.9M | $-7.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.4M | $-16.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.7M | $-1.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3M | $1.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.9M | $235.1K | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.0M | $2.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 38.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 31.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 29.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 43.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 38.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 37.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 31.7% | -6.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.4% | -71.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 30.9% | -8.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 34.7% | -20.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.2% | 11.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.3% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.5% | 12.4% |
| Q1 26 | 27.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 32.1% | -3.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.1% | -56.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.4% | -74.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.5% | -9.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.5% | 4.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.8% | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.5% | 10.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.66 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.85 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.75 | $-0.44 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.81 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.47 | $0.03 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.68 | $0.01 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.52 | $0.06 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $31.9M | $8.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $14.6M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $-16.4M |
| Total Assets | $1.6B | $59.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $31.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $8.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $12.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $7.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $9.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $7.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $10.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $15.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $14.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $10.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $11.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $9.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $5.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $5.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $160.6M | $-16.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $155.7M | $-15.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $148.4M | $-8.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $142.7M | $9.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $136.2M | $9.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $139.7M | $8.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $128.3M | $7.9M |
| Q1 26 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $59.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $51.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $58.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $64.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $62.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $66.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $75.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.99× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.59× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.70× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.73× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-5.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $21.6M | $-5.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.3M | $6.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $439.0K | $-3.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.0M | $764.5K | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.2M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.1M | $-5.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.4M | $206.6K |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $21.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $354.0K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.8M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 112.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 55.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 48.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 75.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 49.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.56× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.09× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.10× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.71× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.34× | -3.21× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.06× | -21.05× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.45× | 0.09× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LARK
Segment breakdown not available.
SNAL
| Pc | $14.7M | 59% |
| Platform Three | $5.2M | 21% |
| Platform Two | $3.3M | 13% |
| Sales Channel Directly To Consumer Mobile Sale | $1.6M | 6% |
