vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of LANDMARK BANCORP INC (LARK) and Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
LANDMARK BANCORP INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($18.8M vs $15.8M, roughly 1.2× Spire Global, Inc.). LANDMARK BANCORP INC runs the higher net margin — 27.0% vs -176.6%, a 203.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, LANDMARK BANCORP INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.0% vs -26.9%). Over the past eight quarters, LANDMARK BANCORP INC's revenue compounded faster (13.1% CAGR vs -32.6%).
Landmark Bancorp Inc is a U.S.-based bank holding company operating Landmark National Bank, primarily serving communities across Kansas. It provides a full range of personal and commercial banking services including deposit accounts, residential mortgages, commercial loans, and wealth management solutions, catering to individual consumers, small businesses and local mid-sized enterprises.
Spire Global, Inc. is a space-to-cloud data and analytics company that specializes in the tracking of global data sets powered by a large constellation of nanosatellites, such as the tracking of maritime, aviation and weather patterns.
LARK vs SPIR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $18.8M | $15.8M |
| Net Profit | $5.1M | $-28.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 40.2% |
| Operating Margin | — | -164.1% |
| Net Margin | 27.0% | -176.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 14.0% | -26.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 7.8% | 42.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.85 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $18.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $18.7M | $15.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.2M | $12.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.3M | $19.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.5M | $23.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.8M | $21.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.9M | $28.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.7M | $25.4M |
| Q1 26 | $5.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.7M | $-28.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.9M | $-19.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.4M | $119.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.7M | $-20.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3M | $-48.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.9M | $-12.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.0M | $-16.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 40.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 36.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 48.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 36.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 32.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 44.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 43.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 31.7% | -164.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.4% | -166.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 30.9% | -122.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 34.7% | -106.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.2% | -144.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.3% | -48.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.5% | -48.6% |
| Q1 26 | 27.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 32.1% | -176.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.1% | -155.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.4% | 623.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.5% | -86.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.5% | -225.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.8% | -43.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.5% | -65.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.66 | $-0.85 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.85 | $-0.61 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.75 | $3.72 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.81 | $-0.77 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.47 | $-1.93 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.68 | $-0.50 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.52 | $-0.68 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $31.9M | $81.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $112.9M |
| Total Assets | $1.6B | $211.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $31.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $81.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $96.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $117.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $35.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $19.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $36.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $45.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $103.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $103.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $160.6M | $112.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $155.7M | $133.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $148.4M | $149.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $142.7M | $3.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $136.2M | $-11.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $139.7M | $30.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $128.3M | $40.3M |
| Q1 26 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $211.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $224.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $239.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $208.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $193.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $224.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $230.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 27.92× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.16× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.12× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-4.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-16.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -102.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 75.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-92.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $21.6M | $-4.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.3M | $-12.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $439.0K | $-35.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.0M | $-8.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.2M | $-19.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.1M | $14.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.4M | $-4.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $21.0M | $-16.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.1M | $-20.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $354.0K | $-38.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.0M | $-17.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.9M | $-24.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.8M | $5.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.8M | $-9.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 112.5% | -102.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 55.4% | -161.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.0% | -201.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 48.4% | -72.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 75.6% | -112.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 49.3% | 17.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.6% | -39.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.2% | 75.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | 66.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.5% | 18.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.3% | 37.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.7% | 23.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.8% | 31.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.2% | 21.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.56× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.09× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.10× | -0.29× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.71× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.34× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.06× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.45× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
