vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of LANDMARK BANCORP INC (LARK) and SS Innovations International, Inc. (SSII). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
LANDMARK BANCORP INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($18.8M vs $14.5M, roughly 1.3× SS Innovations International, Inc.). LANDMARK BANCORP INC runs the higher net margin — 27.0% vs -17.0%, a 44.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SS Innovations International, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (79.1% vs 14.0%). Over the past eight quarters, SS Innovations International, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (99.9% CAGR vs 13.1%).
Landmark Bancorp Inc is a U.S.-based bank holding company operating Landmark National Bank, primarily serving communities across Kansas. It provides a full range of personal and commercial banking services including deposit accounts, residential mortgages, commercial loans, and wealth management solutions, catering to individual consumers, small businesses and local mid-sized enterprises.
SS Innovations International, Inc. is a global medical technology enterprise specializing in the research, development and manufacturing of innovative surgical robotic systems. It provides high-precision, accessible robotic platforms for minimally invasive surgery, catering to healthcare facilities across multiple regions to boost surgical outcomes and cut procedural burdens.
LARK vs SSII — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $18.8M | $14.5M |
| Net Profit | $5.1M | $-2.5M |
| Gross Margin | — | 43.9% |
| Operating Margin | — | -3.7% |
| Net Margin | 27.0% | -17.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 14.0% | 79.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 7.8% | -28.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $18.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $18.7M | $14.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.2M | $12.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.3M | $10.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.5M | $5.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.8M | $8.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.9M | $4.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.7M | $4.5M |
| Q1 26 | $5.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.7M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.9M | $-3.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.4M | $-256.7K | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.7M | $-5.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3M | $-1.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.9M | $-3.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.0M | $-4.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 43.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 48.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 59.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 21.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 48.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 52.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 31.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 31.7% | -3.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.4% | -14.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 30.9% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 34.7% | -115.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.2% | -22.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.3% | -73.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.5% | -90.9% |
| Q1 26 | 27.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 32.1% | -17.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.1% | -29.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.4% | -2.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.5% | -111.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.5% | -23.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.8% | -74.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.5% | -91.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.66 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.85 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.75 | $0.00 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.81 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.47 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.68 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.52 | $-0.02 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $31.9M | $3.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $38.2M |
| Total Assets | $1.6B | $74.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $31.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $3.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $11.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $15.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $466.5K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $220.4K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $608.2K |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $160.6M | $38.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $155.7M | $39.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $148.4M | $42.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $142.7M | $40.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $136.2M | $13.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $139.7M | $13.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $128.3M | $14.8M |
| Q1 26 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $74.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $69.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $70.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $63.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $42.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $39.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $35.7M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-1.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-3.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -22.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 11.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-22.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $21.6M | $-1.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.3M | $-7.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $439.0K | $-3.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.0M | $-6.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.2M | $-3.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.1M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.4M | $-1.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $21.0M | $-3.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.1M | $-8.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $354.0K | $-3.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.0M | $-7.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.9M | $-3.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.8M | $-4.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.8M | $-3.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 112.5% | -22.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 55.4% | -64.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.0% | -37.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 48.4% | -136.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 75.6% | -41.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 49.3% | -96.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.6% | -69.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.2% | 11.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.5% | 3.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.3% | 17.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.7% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.8% | 38.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.2% | 46.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.56× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.09× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.10× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.71× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.34× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.06× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.45× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LARK
Segment breakdown not available.
SSII
| System Sales | $13.4M | 92% |
| Other | $1.2M | 8% |
