vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Laser Photonics Corp (LASE) and Polar Power, Inc. (POLA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Polar Power, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.3M vs $919.3K, roughly 1.4× Laser Photonics Corp). Polar Power, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -320.9% vs -506.4%, a 185.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Laser Photonics Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (28.3% vs -74.1%). Over the past eight quarters, Laser Photonics Corp's revenue compounded faster (-3.9% CAGR vs -40.6%).
IPG Photonics Corporation is a manufacturer of fiber lasers. IPG Photonics developed and commercialized optical fiber lasers, which are used in a variety of applications including materials processing, medical applications and telecommunications. IPG has manufacturing facilities in the United States, Germany, Russia and Italy.
Polar Electro Oy is a Finnish manufacturer of sports training computers, particularly known for developing the world's first wireless heart rate monitor.
LASE vs POLA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $919.3K | $1.3M |
| Net Profit | $-4.7M | $-4.1M |
| Gross Margin | -20.1% | -177.5% |
| Operating Margin | -350.0% | -304.6% |
| Net Margin | -506.4% | -320.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 28.3% | -74.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -186.5% | -31523.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.27 | $-1.63 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | $919.3K | $1.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6M | $2.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3M | $1.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3M | $2.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $716.7K | $4.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $623.4K | $4.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $743.0K | $1.8M | ||
| Q4 23 | $994.6K | $3.6M |
| Q3 25 | $-4.7M | $-4.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.8M | $-271.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.7M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $586.4K | $-3.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.6M | $13.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-934.3K | $501.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-545.7K | $-2.1M | ||
| Q4 23 | $-486.6K | $-3.2M |
| Q3 25 | -20.1% | -177.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 53.5% | 34.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 49.8% | 18.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.3% | -58.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 85.0% | 29.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 50.6% | 39.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 51.9% | -22.6% | ||
| Q4 23 | 84.5% | -39.6% |
| Q3 25 | -350.0% | -304.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -37.0% | -4.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -68.7% | -63.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -255.1% | -110.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -238.0% | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -149.4% | 9.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -73.8% | -111.5% | ||
| Q4 23 | -88.4% | -82.4% |
| Q3 25 | -506.4% | -320.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -68.3% | -10.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -73.4% | -73.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 45.7% | -116.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -226.8% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -149.9% | 10.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -73.4% | -120.7% | ||
| Q4 23 | -48.9% | -87.5% |
| Q3 25 | $-0.27 | $-1.63 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.12 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.12 | $-0.50 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.06 | $-1.22 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.13 | $0.01 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.09 | $0.20 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.06 | $-0.85 | ||
| Q4 23 | $-0.03 | $-3.19 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $3.6M | $4.0K |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.1M | $2.9M |
| Total Assets | $17.5M | $12.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $3.6M | $4.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $78.5K | $175.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $179.1K | $68.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $533.9K | $498.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1M | $498.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7M | $1.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.2M | $212.0K | ||
| Q4 23 | $6.2M | $549.0K |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $64.0K |
| Q3 25 | $4.1M | $2.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.3M | $7.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.8M | $7.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.2M | $8.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.7M | $11.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.3M | $11.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.4M | $11.0M | ||
| Q4 23 | $13.9M | $13.2M |
| Q3 25 | $17.5M | $12.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.9M | $16.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.0M | $16.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.2M | $17.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.6M | $20.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.1M | $22.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $13.6M | $23.9M | ||
| Q4 23 | $15.1M | $25.3M |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 0.00× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $763.1K | $399.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $763.1K | $399.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.0M | $-404.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.2M | $-584.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-6.5M | $-136.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $632.7K | $-590.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.4M | $1.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-866.3K | $-989.0K | ||
| Q4 23 | $-2.0M | $-346.0K |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $589.6K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.0M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 82.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -388.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -136.9% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.0% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.3% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -11.11× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -45.38× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.35× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LASE
Segment breakdown not available.
POLA
| Telecommunications | $1.2M | 92% |
| Other | $101.0K | 8% |
