vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of NLIGHT, INC. (LASR) and Nine Energy Service, Inc. (NINE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
NLIGHT, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($80.2M vs $41.6M, roughly 1.9× Nine Energy Service, Inc.). Nine Energy Service, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 259.3% vs 0.8%, a 258.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, NLIGHT, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (55.2% vs -68.5%). Over the past eight quarters, NLIGHT, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (26.0% CAGR vs -43.9%).
nLight Inc. is a global developer and manufacturer of high-performance semiconductor lasers, fiber lasers, and related optical components. Its products serve key segments including industrial precision manufacturing, aerospace and defense, medical equipment, and advanced research, with customers across North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific.
Xcel Energy Inc. is a U.S. regulated electric utility and natural gas delivery company based in Minneapolis, Minnesota, serving approximately 3.9 million electricity customers and 2.2 million natural gas customers across parts of eight states as of mid-2025. It consists of four operating subsidiaries: Northern States Power-Minnesota, Northern States Power-Wisconsin, Public Service Company of Colorado, and Southwestern Public Service Co.
LASR vs NINE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $80.2M | $41.6M |
| Net Profit | $645.0K | $107.9M |
| Gross Margin | 33.1% | 9.1% |
| Operating Margin | 66.0% | — |
| Net Margin | 0.8% | 259.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 55.2% | -68.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.01 | $2.65 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $80.2M | $41.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $81.2M | $132.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $66.7M | $132.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $61.7M | $147.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $51.7M | $150.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $47.4M | $141.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $56.1M | $138.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $50.5M | $132.4M |
| Q1 26 | $645.0K | $107.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-4.9M | $-19.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-6.9M | $-14.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.6M | $-10.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-8.1M | $-7.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-25.0M | $-8.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-10.3M | $-10.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-11.7M | $-14.0M |
| Q1 26 | 33.1% | 9.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 30.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 31.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 29.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | 66.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -6.7% | -4.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -10.9% | -0.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.9% | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -18.6% | 3.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -55.8% | 2.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -21.0% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -25.1% | -1.1% |
| Q1 26 | 0.8% | 259.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | -6.0% | -14.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -10.3% | -11.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -5.8% | -7.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -15.7% | -4.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -52.7% | -6.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -18.4% | -7.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -23.2% | -10.6% |
| Q1 26 | $0.01 | $2.65 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.10 | $-0.47 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.14 | $-0.35 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.07 | $-0.25 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.16 | $-0.18 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.52 | $-0.21 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.21 | $-0.26 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.25 | $-0.40 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $298.2M | $11.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $94.4M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $429.2M | — |
| Total Assets | $515.7M | $326.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $298.2M | $11.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $98.7M | $18.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $81.1M | $14.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $78.8M | $14.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $82.2M | $17.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $65.8M | $27.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $41.5M | $15.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $49.4M | $26.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $94.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $429.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $226.7M | $-115.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $218.5M | $-95.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $216.0M | $-81.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $212.8M | $-72.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $216.4M | $-66.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $235.3M | $-57.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $239.5M | $-49.7M |
| Q1 26 | $515.7M | $326.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $315.2M | $339.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $298.7M | $340.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $295.3M | $361.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $290.0M | $359.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $270.2M | $360.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $291.3M | $353.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $294.3M | $381.7M |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LASR
| Products | $58.2M | 73% |
| Development | $22.0M | 27% |
NINE
Segment breakdown not available.
