vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CS Disco, Inc. (LAW) and VIEMED HEALTHCARE, INC. (VMD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
VIEMED HEALTHCARE, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($76.2M vs $41.9M, roughly 1.8× CS Disco, Inc.). VIEMED HEALTHCARE, INC. runs the higher net margin — 7.4% vs -23.0%, a 30.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, VIEMED HEALTHCARE, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (25.5% vs 14.3%). Over the past eight quarters, VIEMED HEALTHCARE, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (22.7% CAGR vs 7.9%).
CS Disco, Inc. is a leading legal technology provider that develops cloud-based software solutions for legal practitioners. Its core offerings include e-discovery, document review, case management, and legal workflow automation tools, serving law firms, corporate legal teams, and government legal departments primarily in North America.
Viemed Healthcare, Inc. is a medical technology firm specializing in respiratory care solutions. It develops, manufactures and distributes portable ventilators, respiratory therapy devices and related support services, catering to acute care, post-acute care and home care segments across North America, Europe and key Asia-Pacific markets for patients with respiratory conditions.
LAW vs VMD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $41.9M | $76.2M |
| Net Profit | $-9.6M | $5.6M |
| Gross Margin | 74.2% | 57.9% |
| Operating Margin | 1.7% | 11.0% |
| Net Margin | -23.0% | 7.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 14.3% | 25.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 15.6% | 30.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.15 | $0.14 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $41.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $41.2M | $76.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $40.9M | $71.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $38.1M | $63.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $36.7M | $59.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $37.0M | $60.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $36.3M | $58.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $36.0M | $55.0M |
| Q1 26 | $-9.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-8.5M | $5.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-13.7M | $3.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-10.8M | $3.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.4M | $2.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-25.2M | $4.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.2M | $3.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-10.8M | $1.5M |
| Q1 26 | 74.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 75.1% | 57.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 75.5% | 57.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 74.6% | 58.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 74.1% | 56.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 74.2% | 59.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 73.1% | 59.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 74.2% | 59.8% |
| Q1 26 | 1.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -22.4% | 11.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -35.3% | 7.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -31.0% | 8.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -34.4% | 6.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -70.6% | 10.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -30.0% | 9.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -34.4% | 6.6% |
| Q1 26 | -23.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -20.7% | 7.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -33.4% | 4.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -28.4% | 5.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -31.1% | 4.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -68.1% | 7.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -25.3% | 6.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -30.1% | 2.7% |
| Q1 26 | $-0.15 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.13 | $0.14 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.22 | $0.09 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.18 | $0.08 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.19 | $0.06 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.43 | $0.10 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.15 | $0.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.18 | $0.04 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $103.0M | $13.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $123.9M | $141.5M |
| Total Assets | $162.4M | $199.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $103.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $114.6M | $13.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $113.5M | $11.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $114.5M | $20.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $118.8M | $10.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $129.1M | $17.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $126.8M | $11.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $130.0M | $8.8M |
| Q1 26 | $123.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $128.1M | $141.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $130.6M | $133.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $137.9M | $139.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $142.2M | $134.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $147.5M | $131.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $167.3M | $125.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $170.9M | $119.4M |
| Q1 26 | $162.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $173.6M | $199.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $174.8M | $202.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $164.9M | $184.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $168.0M | $178.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $180.3M | $177.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $194.4M | $169.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $198.0M | $163.9M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-11.7M | $18.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $9.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 12.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 11.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 3.27× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $11.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $-11.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $762.0K | $18.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-979.0K | $18.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.2M | $12.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-10.5M | $2.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1M | $15.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.9M | $12.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-650.0K | $10.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $255.0K | $9.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.0M | $10.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.2M | $4.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.0M | $-12.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5M | $3.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.7M | $1.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.3M | $1.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | 12.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -5.0% | 14.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -13.6% | 6.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -30.1% | -21.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.1% | 5.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -10.3% | 3.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.6% | 2.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.2% | 11.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | 10.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.5% | 12.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.4% | 26.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.5% | 19.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.4% | 19.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.8% | 16.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.27× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.23× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.88× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.09× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.47× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.29× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.94× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
