vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Li Bang International Corp Inc. (LBGJ) and SYNTEC OPTICS HOLDINGS, INC. (OPTX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SYNTEC OPTICS HOLDINGS, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($7.5M vs $4.7M, roughly 1.6× Li Bang International Corp Inc.). SYNTEC OPTICS HOLDINGS, INC. runs the higher net margin — -4.6% vs -23.9%, a 19.3% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Li & Fung Limited is a Hong Kong–based supply chain management company. Established in 1906, the company became publicly traded in 1973 and has since played a significant role in manufacturing apparel, toys, and various consumer goods for major North American and European retailers. Significant growth occurred after its public listing, reaching a peak market capitalization in 2011, but the rise of platforms like Alibaba and Amazon, which directly connect manufacturers with consumers, created ...
LBGJ vs OPTX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2024 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.7M | $7.5M |
| Net Profit | $-1.1M | $-343.8K |
| Gross Margin | 17.8% | 23.6% |
| Operating Margin | -25.1% | 4.2% |
| Net Margin | -23.9% | -4.6% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 2.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 77.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.06 | $-0.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $7.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $7.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $6.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $7.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.7M | $7.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $7.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $6.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-343.8K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-1.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-343.9K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $323.7K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.1M | $-1.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-13.3K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $281.8K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 23.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 12.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 24.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 32.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.8% | 13.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 23.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 31.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 11.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -17.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -2.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -25.1% | -19.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -22.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | -4.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -20.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -5.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -23.9% | -21.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -19.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.01 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.04 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.01 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.06 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.00 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.01 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.03 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $10.2M | $2.6M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $7.8M | $9.5M |
| Total Assets | $28.8M | $24.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.31× | 0.28× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $2.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.2M | $3.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $9.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $9.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $11.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $11.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.8M | $11.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $12.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $12.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $11.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $24.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $24.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $25.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $26.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $28.8M | $26.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $27.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $25.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $24.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.28× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.28× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.26× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.26× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.31× | 0.28× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.26× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.23× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.25× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $258.4K | $-3.9K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-4.4K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -0.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $28.3K |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-3.9K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $535.3K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-158.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $299.3K | ||
| Q4 24 | $258.4K | $623.8K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $417.3K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-289.8K |
| Q4 25 | — | $-4.4K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $496.3K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-548.1K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $84.6K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $12.1K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $43.8K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-385.1K |
| Q4 25 | — | -0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 7.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -8.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -26.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -6.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.92× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -6.01× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
