vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Li Bang International Corp Inc. (LBGJ) and VALUE LINE INC (VALU). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
VALUE LINE INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($8.3M vs $4.7M, roughly 1.8× Li Bang International Corp Inc.). VALUE LINE INC runs the higher net margin — 71.4% vs -23.9%, a 95.3% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Li & Fung Limited is a Hong Kong–based supply chain management company. Established in 1906, the company became publicly traded in 1973 and has since played a significant role in manufacturing apparel, toys, and various consumer goods for major North American and European retailers. Significant growth occurred after its public listing, reaching a peak market capitalization in 2011, but the rise of platforms like Alibaba and Amazon, which directly connect manufacturers with consumers, created ...
Value Line, Inc. is a publicly traded investment research and financial publishing firm based in New York City. Founded in 1931 by Arnold Bernhard, Value Line is best known for publishing The Value Line Investment Survey, a stock analysis newsletter that tracks approximately 1,700 publicly traded stocks.
LBGJ vs VALU — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2024 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.7M | $8.3M |
| Net Profit | $-1.1M | $5.9M |
| Gross Margin | 17.8% | — |
| Operating Margin | -25.1% | 12.1% |
| Net Margin | -23.9% | 71.4% |
| Revenue YoY | — | -7.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 14.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.06 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $8.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $8.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $8.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $8.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $9.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.7M | $8.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $8.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $9.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $5.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $5.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $6.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $5.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.1M | $5.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $5.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 12.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 17.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 17.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 9.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 17.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -25.1% | 19.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 20.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 16.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 71.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 66.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 75.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 47.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 57.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -23.9% | 64.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 66.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 53.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.06 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $92.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $10.2M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $7.8M | $107.8M |
| Total Assets | $28.8M | $151.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.31× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $92.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $86.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $33.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $67.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $52.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $22.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $30.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $107.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $105.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $103.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $99.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $99.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.8M | $96.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $93.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $90.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | $151.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $147.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $148.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $144.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $143.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $28.8M | $140.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $138.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $136.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.31× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $258.4K | $5.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.89× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $5.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $3.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $20.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $6.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $258.4K | $3.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $17.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $20.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $6.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $17.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 239.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 75.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 34.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 53.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 199.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.89× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.52× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.86× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.12× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.33× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.54× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.81× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.75× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
