vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Liberty Broadband Corp (LBRDA) and MERIT MEDICAL SYSTEMS INC (MMSI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MERIT MEDICAL SYSTEMS INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($381.9M vs $261.0M, roughly 1.5× Liberty Broadband Corp). Liberty Broadband Corp runs the higher net margin — 146.7% vs 10.7%, a 136.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, MERIT MEDICAL SYSTEMS INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.5% vs 6.1%). Liberty Broadband Corp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($37.0M vs $24.7M). Over the past eight quarters, MERIT MEDICAL SYSTEMS INC's revenue compounded faster (6.3% CAGR vs 4.3%).
Liberty Global Ltd. is a British-Dutch-American multinational telecommunications company domiciled in Bermuda, with headquarters in London, Amsterdam and Denver. Its respective legal names are Liberty Global Holdings Limited (UK), Liberty Global B.V. (Netherlands) and Liberty Global, Inc., with the first of these being publicly traded. It was formed in 2005 by the merger of the international arm of Liberty Media and UnitedGlobalCom (UGC).
Merit Medical Systems Inc. is a global medical device firm that designs, manufactures, and markets a broad portfolio of interventional and diagnostic products used across cardiology, radiology, oncology, endoscopy, and critical care segments. It primarily serves hospitals, clinics, and healthcare providers worldwide, focusing on minimally invasive solutions that enhance patient outcomes and streamline clinical workflows.
LBRDA vs MMSI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $261.0M | $381.9M |
| Net Profit | $383.0M | $41.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 48.4% |
| Operating Margin | 15.7% | 11.6% |
| Net Margin | 146.7% | 10.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.1% | 7.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 96.4% | 36.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.68 | $0.68 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $381.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $393.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $384.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $261.0M | $382.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $266.0M | $355.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $263.0M | $355.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $262.0M | $339.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $246.0M | $338.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $41.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $38.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $27.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $383.0M | $32.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $268.0M | $30.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $291.0M | $27.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $142.0M | $28.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $195.0M | $35.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | 48.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 49.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 48.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 48.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 48.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 48.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 46.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 47.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 11.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 13.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 11.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.7% | 12.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.2% | 11.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.9% | 10.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.5% | 11.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.5% | 13.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 10.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 9.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 7.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 146.7% | 8.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 100.8% | 8.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 110.6% | 7.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 54.2% | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 79.3% | 10.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.68 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $0.64 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.46 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.68 | $0.54 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.87 | $0.49 | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.04 | $0.46 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.99 | $0.48 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.36 | $0.61 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $180.0M | $488.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.1B | $735.2M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $10.4B | $1.6B |
| Total Assets | $16.6B | $2.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.30× | 0.45× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $488.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $446.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $392.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $180.0M | $341.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $226.0M | $395.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $163.0M | $376.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $168.0M | $523.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $73.0M | $636.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | $735.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $734.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $732.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.1B | $731.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.8B | $730.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.8B | $729.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.7B | $750.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.6B | $801.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.4B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.1B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.8B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.5B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.3B | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.6B | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.0B | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.7B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.3B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.0B | $2.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.45× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.46× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.48× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.30× | 0.49× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.38× | 0.51× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.38× | 0.53× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.39× | 0.57× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.39× | 0.62× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $91.0M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $37.0M | $24.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 14.2% | 6.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 20.7% | 4.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.24× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-49.0M | $220.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $98.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $75.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $91.0M | $83.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $78.0M | $40.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0M | $68.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $24.0M | $47.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.0M | $68.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $24.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $74.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $52.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $37.0M | $69.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.0M | $19.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-63.0M | $65.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-36.0M | $38.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-35.0M | $57.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | 6.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 18.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 13.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.2% | 18.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.9% | 5.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -24.0% | 18.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -13.7% | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -14.2% | 17.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 4.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 6.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.7% | 3.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.4% | 5.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.3% | 1.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.9% | 2.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.2% | 3.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.59× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.70× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.24× | 2.56× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.29× | 1.35× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.00× | 2.46× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.17× | 1.66× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.14× | 1.92× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
