vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Liberty Energy Inc. (LBRT) and TIMKEN CO (TKR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TIMKEN CO is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.2B vs $1.0B, roughly 1.2× Liberty Energy Inc.). TIMKEN CO runs the higher net margin — 8.6% vs 2.2%, a 6.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, TIMKEN CO posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.0% vs 4.5%). Over the past eight quarters, TIMKEN CO's revenue compounded faster (2.1% CAGR vs -6.2%).
Liberty Energy Inc. is a North American energy services provider specializing in hydraulic fracturing and well completion solutions for oil and gas operators. It serves clients across major U.S. shale basins, offering low-emission equipment and tailored support to optimize well productivity.
The Timken Company is a global manufacturer of engineered bearings and industrial motion products. Headquartered in North Canton, Ohio, the company operates from 45 countries.
LBRT vs TKR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.0B | $1.2B |
| Net Profit | $22.6M | $105.9M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 2.2% | 13.7% |
| Net Margin | 2.2% | 8.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.5% | 8.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 25.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.14 | $1.40 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.0B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.0B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $947.4M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $977.5M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $943.6M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $1.2B |
| Q1 26 | $22.6M | $105.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $13.7M | $62.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $43.1M | $69.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $71.0M | $78.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.1M | $78.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $51.9M | $71.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $73.8M | $81.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $108.4M | $96.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 20.6% | 29.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.7% | 30.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.1% | 30.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.1% | 31.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.4% | 30.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.2% | 30.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.9% | 31.6% |
| Q1 26 | 2.2% | 13.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.9% | 9.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.3% | 12.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.6% | 12.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.9% | 12.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.6% | 10.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.4% | 13.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.2% | 14.1% |
| Q1 26 | 2.2% | 8.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.3% | 5.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.5% | 6.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.8% | 6.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.1% | 6.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | 6.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.5% | 7.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.3% | 8.1% |
| Q1 26 | $0.14 | $1.40 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.08 | $0.89 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.26 | $0.99 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.43 | $1.12 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.12 | $1.11 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.31 | $1.01 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.44 | $1.16 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.64 | $1.36 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $699.1M | $344.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $7.1M | $2.0B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.9B | $3.4B |
| Total Assets | $4.4B | $6.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.00× | 0.60× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $699.1M | $344.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $27.6M | $364.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.5M | $449.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.6M | $419.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.1M | $376.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $20.0M | $373.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $23.0M | $412.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.0M | $469.9M |
| Q1 26 | $7.1M | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $246.6M | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $190.5M | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.1B |
| Q1 26 | $1.9B | $3.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0B | $3.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | $2.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $2.8B |
| Q1 26 | $4.4B | $6.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.6B | $6.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.5B | $6.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4B | $6.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.4B | $6.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | $6.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3B | $6.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | $6.6B |
| Q1 26 | 0.00× | 0.60× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.12× | 0.60× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.67× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.70× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.73× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.10× | 0.73× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.75× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.77× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $39.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $500.0K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 0.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 13.1% | 3.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.37× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $383.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $39.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $195.4M | $183.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $51.5M | $201.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $170.6M | $111.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $192.1M | $58.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $177.3M | $178.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $244.5M | $123.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $248.2M | $124.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $500.0K | ||
| Q4 25 | $-10.0M | $140.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-67.2M | $163.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.1M | $78.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $58.2M | $23.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-26.2M | $125.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $77.9M | $88.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $112.2M | $87.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | -1.0% | 12.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -7.1% | 14.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.2% | 6.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.0% | 2.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.8% | 11.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.8% | 7.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.7% | 7.4% |
| Q1 26 | 13.1% | 3.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 19.8% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.5% | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.2% | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.7% | 3.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.6% | 5.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.6% | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.7% | 3.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.37× | ||
| Q4 25 | 14.28× | 2.94× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.20× | 2.90× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.40× | 1.42× | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.55× | 0.75× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.42× | 2.51× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.31× | 1.51× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.29× | 1.30× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LBRT
Segment breakdown not available.
TKR
| Engineered Bearings | $806.2M | 65% |
| Industrial Motion | $425.1M | 35% |
