vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Liberty Global Ltd. (LBTYA) and Yum! Brands (YUM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Yum! Brands is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.5B vs $2.4B, roughly 1.1× Liberty Global Ltd.). Yum! Brands runs the higher net margin — 21.3% vs 15.0%, a 6.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Yum! Brands posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.5% vs -3.6%). Over the past eight quarters, Yum! Brands's revenue compounded faster (25.5% CAGR vs 12.9%).

Liberty Global Ltd. is a British-Dutch-American multinational telecommunications company domiciled in Bermuda, with headquarters in London, Amsterdam and Denver. Its respective legal names are Liberty Global Holdings Limited (UK), Liberty Global B.V. (Netherlands) and Liberty Global, Inc., with the first of these being publicly traded. It was formed in 2005 by the merger of the international arm of Liberty Media and UnitedGlobalCom (UGC).

Yum! Brands, Inc. is an American multinational fast food corporation. It was formed in 1977 as a subsidiary of PepsiCo, after the company acquired KFC, Pizza Hut, and Taco Bell. PepsiCo divested the brands in 1997, and these consolidated as Yum!. The company operates KFC, Pizza Hut, Taco Bell, Habit Burger & Grill, and several technology companies.

LBTYA vs YUM — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
YUM
YUM
1.1× larger
YUM
$2.5B
$2.4B
LBTYA
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
YUM
YUM
+10.1% gap
YUM
6.5%
-3.6%
LBTYA
Higher net margin
YUM
YUM
6.3% more per $
YUM
21.3%
15.0%
LBTYA
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
YUM
YUM
Annualised
YUM
25.5%
12.9%
LBTYA

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
LBTYA
LBTYA
YUM
YUM
Revenue
$2.4B
$2.5B
Net Profit
$358.2M
$535.0M
Gross Margin
67.6%
Operating Margin
1.0%
29.3%
Net Margin
15.0%
21.3%
Revenue YoY
-3.6%
6.5%
Net Profit YoY
127.1%
26.5%
EPS (diluted)
$1.91

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
LBTYA
LBTYA
YUM
YUM
Q1 26
$2.4B
Q4 25
$1.2B
$2.5B
Q3 25
$1.2B
$2.0B
Q2 25
$1.3B
$1.9B
Q1 25
$1.2B
$1.8B
Q4 24
$-1.4B
$2.4B
Q3 24
$1.9B
$1.8B
Q2 24
$1.9B
$1.8B
Net Profit
LBTYA
LBTYA
YUM
YUM
Q1 26
$358.2M
Q4 25
$-2.9B
$535.0M
Q3 25
$-90.7M
$397.0M
Q2 25
$-2.8B
$374.0M
Q1 25
$-1.3B
$253.0M
Q4 24
$2.2B
$423.0M
Q3 24
$-1.4B
$382.0M
Q2 24
$268.1M
$367.0M
Gross Margin
LBTYA
LBTYA
YUM
YUM
Q1 26
Q4 25
66.8%
67.6%
Q3 25
67.5%
70.3%
Q2 25
63.3%
71.0%
Q1 25
65.6%
70.9%
Q4 24
69.2%
Q3 24
69.4%
71.4%
Q2 24
68.5%
73.3%
Operating Margin
LBTYA
LBTYA
YUM
YUM
Q1 26
1.0%
Q4 25
-8.6%
29.3%
Q3 25
-0.7%
33.7%
Q2 25
2.3%
32.2%
Q1 25
5.2%
30.7%
Q4 24
27.8%
Q3 24
5.2%
33.9%
Q2 24
1.0%
34.4%
Net Margin
LBTYA
LBTYA
YUM
YUM
Q1 26
15.0%
Q4 25
-237.0%
21.3%
Q3 25
-7.5%
20.1%
Q2 25
-220.1%
19.3%
Q1 25
-114.2%
14.2%
Q4 24
-158.9%
17.9%
Q3 24
-74.1%
20.9%
Q2 24
14.3%
20.8%
EPS (diluted)
LBTYA
LBTYA
YUM
YUM
Q1 26
Q4 25
$-8.66
$1.91
Q3 25
$-0.27
$1.41
Q2 25
$-8.09
$1.33
Q1 25
$-3.84
$0.90
Q4 24
$6.15
$1.49
Q3 24
$-3.95
$1.35
Q2 24
$0.71
$1.28

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
LBTYA
LBTYA
YUM
YUM
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$-387.3M
$709.0M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$11.9B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$-7.3B
Total Assets
$8.2B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
LBTYA
LBTYA
YUM
YUM
Q1 26
$-387.3M
Q4 25
$2.2B
$709.0M
Q3 25
$1.7B
$1.0B
Q2 25
$3.1B
$677.0M
Q1 25
$2.0B
$607.0M
Q4 24
$2.2B
$707.0M
Q3 24
$3.3B
$548.0M
Q2 24
$3.2B
$520.0M
Total Debt
LBTYA
LBTYA
YUM
YUM
Q1 26
Q4 25
$7.8B
$11.9B
Q3 25
$7.8B
$11.5B
Q2 25
$7.8B
$10.4B
Q1 25
$8.2B
$11.3B
Q4 24
$8.2B
$11.3B
Q3 24
$14.9B
$11.2B
Q2 24
$14.7B
$11.1B
Stockholders' Equity
LBTYA
LBTYA
YUM
YUM
Q1 26
Q4 25
$9.7B
$-7.3B
Q3 25
$12.7B
$-7.5B
Q2 25
$13.0B
$-7.7B
Q1 25
$12.6B
$-7.8B
Q4 24
$12.4B
$-7.6B
Q3 24
$18.7B
$-7.7B
Q2 24
$18.3B
$-7.6B
Total Assets
LBTYA
LBTYA
YUM
YUM
Q1 26
Q4 25
$22.6B
$8.2B
Q3 25
$25.4B
$7.2B
Q2 25
$27.2B
$6.9B
Q1 25
$26.0B
$6.7B
Q4 24
$25.4B
$6.7B
Q3 24
$41.8B
$6.5B
Q2 24
$40.8B
$6.4B
Debt / Equity
LBTYA
LBTYA
YUM
YUM
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.80×
Q3 25
0.61×
Q2 25
0.60×
Q1 25
0.65×
Q4 24
0.66×
Q3 24
0.80×
Q2 24
0.80×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
LBTYA
LBTYA
YUM
YUM
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$107.6M
$617.0M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$482.0M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
19.2%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
1.5%
5.4%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
0.30×
1.15×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$1.6B

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
LBTYA
LBTYA
YUM
YUM
Q1 26
$107.6M
Q4 25
$630.9M
$617.0M
Q3 25
$301.8M
$543.0M
Q2 25
$149.2M
$446.0M
Q1 25
$129.2M
$404.0M
Q4 24
$791.6M
$513.0M
Q3 24
$449.5M
$471.0M
Q2 24
$546.1M
$342.0M
Free Cash Flow
LBTYA
LBTYA
YUM
YUM
Q1 26
Q4 25
$193.3M
$482.0M
Q3 25
$-41.1M
$449.0M
Q2 25
$-170.1M
$375.0M
Q1 25
$-114.1M
$333.0M
Q4 24
$712.9M
$407.0M
Q3 24
$102.4M
$419.0M
Q2 24
$256.8M
$292.0M
FCF Margin
LBTYA
LBTYA
YUM
YUM
Q1 26
Q4 25
15.7%
19.2%
Q3 25
-3.4%
22.7%
Q2 25
-13.4%
19.4%
Q1 25
-9.7%
18.6%
Q4 24
-50.5%
17.2%
Q3 24
5.3%
22.9%
Q2 24
13.7%
16.6%
Capex Intensity
LBTYA
LBTYA
YUM
YUM
Q1 26
1.5%
Q4 25
35.5%
5.4%
Q3 25
28.4%
4.7%
Q2 25
25.2%
3.7%
Q1 25
20.8%
4.0%
Q4 24
-5.6%
4.5%
Q3 24
17.9%
2.8%
Q2 24
15.4%
2.8%
Cash Conversion
LBTYA
LBTYA
YUM
YUM
Q1 26
0.30×
Q4 25
1.15×
Q3 25
1.37×
Q2 25
1.19×
Q1 25
1.60×
Q4 24
0.35×
1.21×
Q3 24
1.23×
Q2 24
2.04×
0.93×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

LBTYA
LBTYA

Mobile Service$775.2M32%
Fixed Service$772.0M32%
Business$308.7M13%
Wholesale$256.9M11%
Business Service$233.2M10%

YUM
YUM

Other$1.5B59%
Advertising$547.0M22%
Pizza Hut Global Division$303.0M12%
The Habit Burger Grill Global Division$174.0M7%
Real Estate$4.0M0%

Related Comparisons