vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Lakeshore Acquisition III Corp. (LCCC) and SmartKem, Inc. (SMTK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Lakeshore Acquisition III Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($717.3K vs $561.0K, roughly 1.3× SmartKem, Inc.). Lakeshore Acquisition III Corp. runs the higher net margin — 67.9% vs -366.3%, a 434.2% gap on every dollar of revenue.
SmartKem, Inc. is an advanced materials developer focused on proprietary organic semiconductor formulations designed for flexible and foldable display panels, printed electronics, and next-generation optoelectronic devices. It serves global consumer electronics display manufacturers and semiconductor component producers across North America, East Asia and Europe.
LCCC vs SMTK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $717.3K | $561.0K |
| Net Profit | $486.8K | $-2.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 57.6% |
| Operating Margin | -32.1% | -380.7% |
| Net Margin | 67.9% | -366.3% |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 23.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.08 | $-0.22 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $561.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $717.3K | $81.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $467.3K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0 | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $0 | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $3.0K | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $8.0K | ||
| Q1 23 | — | $16.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | $-2.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $486.8K | $-3.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $216.5K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-2.8M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $-1.4M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $-3.0M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $-2.0M | ||
| Q1 23 | — | $-2.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 57.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 93.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | 66.7% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | 25.0% | ||
| Q1 23 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -380.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -32.1% | -3937.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -53.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | -89833.3% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | -29587.5% | ||
| Q1 23 | — | -15962.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | -366.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 67.9% | -4839.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 46.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | -100733.3% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | -25337.5% | ||
| Q1 23 | — | -12800.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.22 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.08 | $-0.45 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.06 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.86 | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $-0.27 | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $-1.78 | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $-1.82 | ||
| Q1 23 | — | $-2.45 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $374.0K |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-1.6M | $-3.9M |
| Total Assets | $71.0M | $2.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $374.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $881.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.8M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $8.8M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $11.2M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $13.8M | ||
| Q1 23 | — | $1.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-3.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.6M | $-3.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.3M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $8.1M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $10.3M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $12.3M | ||
| Q1 23 | — | $3.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $71.0M | $3.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $70.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.3M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $11.3M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $13.6M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $16.1M | ||
| Q1 23 | — | $5.3M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-206.3K | $-1.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.42× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-1.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-206.3K | $-200.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-218.3K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-2.6M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $-2.4M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $-2.5M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $-637.0K | ||
| Q1 23 | — | $-2.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $-2.6M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | -85200.0% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | 200.0% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.42× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.01× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
