vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of LIFETIME BRANDS, INC (LCUT) and Lucky Strike Entertainment Corp (LUCK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Lucky Strike Entertainment Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($306.9M vs $204.1M, roughly 1.5× LIFETIME BRANDS, INC). LIFETIME BRANDS, INC runs the higher net margin — 8.9% vs -4.1%, a 13.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Lucky Strike Entertainment Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.3% vs -5.2%). Lucky Strike Entertainment Corp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($15.2M vs $2.6M). Over the past eight quarters, LIFETIME BRANDS, INC's revenue compounded faster (19.8% CAGR vs 0.2%).

Yum! Brands, Inc. is an American multinational fast food corporation. It was formed in 1977 as a subsidiary of PepsiCo, after the company acquired KFC, Pizza Hut, and Taco Bell. PepsiCo divested the brands in 1997, and these consolidated as Yum!. The company operates KFC, Pizza Hut, Taco Bell, Habit Burger & Grill, and several technology companies.

Lucky Strike Entertainment Corporation is an American bowling center, family entertainment center and waterpark operator. It is the largest ten-pin bowling center operator in the world with over 360 centers throughout the United States, Canada and Mexico. The centers have an average of 40 lanes compared to the U.S. bowling center average of 21 lanes.

LCUT vs LUCK — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
LUCK
LUCK
1.5× larger
LUCK
$306.9M
$204.1M
LCUT
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
LUCK
LUCK
+7.4% gap
LUCK
2.3%
-5.2%
LCUT
Higher net margin
LCUT
LCUT
13.0% more per $
LCUT
8.9%
-4.1%
LUCK
More free cash flow
LUCK
LUCK
$12.6M more FCF
LUCK
$15.2M
$2.6M
LCUT
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
LCUT
LCUT
Annualised
LCUT
19.8%
0.2%
LUCK

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026

Metric
LCUT
LCUT
LUCK
LUCK
Revenue
$204.1M
$306.9M
Net Profit
$18.2M
$-12.7M
Gross Margin
38.6%
Operating Margin
9.8%
10.9%
Net Margin
8.9%
-4.1%
Revenue YoY
-5.2%
2.3%
Net Profit YoY
103.5%
-144.7%
EPS (diluted)
$0.83
$-0.11

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
LCUT
LCUT
LUCK
LUCK
Q4 25
$204.1M
$306.9M
Q3 25
$171.9M
$292.3M
Q2 25
$131.9M
$301.2M
Q1 25
$140.1M
$339.9M
Q4 24
$215.2M
$300.1M
Q3 24
$183.8M
$260.2M
Q2 24
$141.7M
Q1 24
$142.2M
$337.7M
Net Profit
LCUT
LCUT
LUCK
LUCK
Q4 25
$18.2M
$-12.7M
Q3 25
$-1.2M
$-13.8M
Q2 25
$-39.7M
$-74.7M
Q1 25
$-4.2M
$13.3M
Q4 24
$8.9M
$28.3M
Q3 24
$344.0K
$23.1M
Q2 24
$-18.2M
Q1 24
$-6.3M
$23.8M
Gross Margin
LCUT
LCUT
LUCK
LUCK
Q4 25
38.6%
Q3 25
35.1%
Q2 25
38.6%
Q1 25
36.1%
Q4 24
37.7%
Q3 24
36.7%
Q2 24
38.5%
Q1 24
40.5%
33.1%
Operating Margin
LCUT
LCUT
LUCK
LUCK
Q4 25
9.8%
10.9%
Q3 25
3.9%
9.7%
Q2 25
-28.2%
5.0%
Q1 25
0.8%
18.3%
Q4 24
7.2%
15.6%
Q3 24
4.7%
5.0%
Q2 24
0.8%
Q1 24
1.3%
21.0%
Net Margin
LCUT
LCUT
LUCK
LUCK
Q4 25
8.9%
-4.1%
Q3 25
-0.7%
-4.7%
Q2 25
-30.1%
-24.8%
Q1 25
-3.0%
3.9%
Q4 24
4.1%
9.4%
Q3 24
0.2%
8.9%
Q2 24
-12.8%
Q1 24
-4.4%
7.1%
EPS (diluted)
LCUT
LCUT
LUCK
LUCK
Q4 25
$0.83
$-0.11
Q3 25
$-0.05
$-0.12
Q2 25
$-1.83
$-0.49
Q1 25
$-0.19
$0.07
Q4 24
$0.41
$0.16
Q3 24
$0.02
$0.13
Q2 24
$-0.85
Q1 24
$-0.29
$0.13

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
LCUT
LCUT
LUCK
LUCK
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$4.3M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$135.0M
$1.8B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$202.3M
$-363.8M
Total Assets
$572.6M
$3.3B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.67×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
LCUT
LCUT
LUCK
LUCK
Q4 25
$4.3M
Q3 25
$12.1M
Q2 25
$12.0M
Q1 25
$10.4M
Q4 24
$2.9M
Q3 24
$6.0M
Q2 24
$3.4M
Q1 24
$4.6M
Total Debt
LCUT
LCUT
LUCK
LUCK
Q4 25
$135.0M
$1.8B
Q3 25
$1.7B
Q2 25
$1.3B
Q1 25
$1.3B
Q4 24
$142.5M
$1.3B
Q3 24
$1.1B
Q2 24
Q1 24
$1.1B
Stockholders' Equity
LCUT
LCUT
LUCK
LUCK
Q4 25
$202.3M
$-363.8M
Q3 25
$184.6M
$-326.3M
Q2 25
$185.8M
$-298.7M
Q1 25
$225.7M
$-213.7M
Q4 24
$229.9M
$-179.7M
Q3 24
$220.9M
$-164.3M
Q2 24
$219.8M
Q1 24
$223.7M
$-76.0M
Total Assets
LCUT
LCUT
LUCK
LUCK
Q4 25
$572.6M
$3.3B
Q3 25
$581.1M
$3.2B
Q2 25
$551.9M
$3.2B
Q1 25
$594.6M
$3.2B
Q4 24
$634.3M
$3.2B
Q3 24
$668.7M
$3.1B
Q2 24
$617.0M
Q1 24
$602.7M
$3.2B
Debt / Equity
LCUT
LCUT
LUCK
LUCK
Q4 25
0.67×
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
0.62×
Q3 24
Q2 24
Q1 24

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
LCUT
LCUT
LUCK
LUCK
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$3.7M
$48.1M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$2.6M
$15.2M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
1.3%
4.9%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
0.6%
10.7%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
0.21×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$3.3M
$42.9M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
LCUT
LCUT
LUCK
LUCK
Q4 25
$3.7M
$48.1M
Q3 25
$-22.2M
$-6.4M
Q2 25
$9.3M
$22.5M
Q1 25
$16.7M
$86.6M
Q4 24
$20.3M
$38.7M
Q3 24
$-22.7M
$29.4M
Q2 24
$10.4M
Q1 24
$10.5M
$76.9M
Free Cash Flow
LCUT
LCUT
LUCK
LUCK
Q4 25
$2.6M
$15.2M
Q3 25
$-22.7M
$-32.3M
Q2 25
$8.2M
$-1.1M
Q1 25
$15.1M
$61.1M
Q4 24
$19.7M
$-11.7M
Q3 24
$-23.2M
$-12.2M
Q2 24
$9.9M
Q1 24
$9.9M
$43.4M
FCF Margin
LCUT
LCUT
LUCK
LUCK
Q4 25
1.3%
4.9%
Q3 25
-13.2%
-11.1%
Q2 25
6.2%
-0.4%
Q1 25
10.8%
18.0%
Q4 24
9.1%
-3.9%
Q3 24
-12.6%
-4.7%
Q2 24
7.0%
Q1 24
7.0%
12.9%
Capex Intensity
LCUT
LCUT
LUCK
LUCK
Q4 25
0.6%
10.7%
Q3 25
0.3%
8.9%
Q2 25
0.9%
7.8%
Q1 25
1.1%
7.5%
Q4 24
0.3%
16.8%
Q3 24
0.3%
16.0%
Q2 24
0.4%
Q1 24
0.4%
9.9%
Cash Conversion
LCUT
LCUT
LUCK
LUCK
Q4 25
0.21×
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
6.52×
Q4 24
2.28×
1.37×
Q3 24
-65.89×
1.27×
Q2 24
Q1 24
3.22×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

LCUT
LCUT

Kitchenware$114.3M56%
Tableware$41.7M20%
Home Solutions$29.4M14%
Other$18.8M9%

LUCK
LUCK

Bowling$142.9M47%
Food And Beverage Revenue Stream$112.4M37%
Amusement And Other$51.6M17%

Related Comparisons