vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of LIFETIME BRANDS, INC (LCUT) and Turning Point Brands, Inc. (TPB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

LIFETIME BRANDS, INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($204.1M vs $121.0M, roughly 1.7× Turning Point Brands, Inc.). LIFETIME BRANDS, INC runs the higher net margin — 8.9% vs 6.8%, a 2.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Turning Point Brands, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (29.2% vs -5.2%). Turning Point Brands, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($21.5M vs $2.6M). Over the past eight quarters, Turning Point Brands, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (20.7% CAGR vs 19.8%).

Yum! Brands, Inc. is an American multinational fast food corporation. It was formed in 1977 as a subsidiary of PepsiCo, after the company acquired KFC, Pizza Hut, and Taco Bell. PepsiCo divested the brands in 1997, and these consolidated as Yum!. The company operates KFC, Pizza Hut, Taco Bell, Habit Burger & Grill, and several technology companies.

Turning Point Australia (TPAUS) is a conservative lobby group based in Australia, affiliated with Turning Point USA but independent of it. Founded by Joel Jammal and first registered in 2023, the group has become active in trying to influence the outcome of the 2026 South Australian state election in March 2026.

LCUT vs TPB — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
LCUT
LCUT
1.7× larger
LCUT
$204.1M
$121.0M
TPB
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
TPB
TPB
+34.4% gap
TPB
29.2%
-5.2%
LCUT
Higher net margin
LCUT
LCUT
2.1% more per $
LCUT
8.9%
6.8%
TPB
More free cash flow
TPB
TPB
$18.9M more FCF
TPB
$21.5M
$2.6M
LCUT
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
TPB
TPB
Annualised
TPB
20.7%
19.8%
LCUT

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
LCUT
LCUT
TPB
TPB
Revenue
$204.1M
$121.0M
Net Profit
$18.2M
$8.2M
Gross Margin
38.6%
55.9%
Operating Margin
9.8%
16.5%
Net Margin
8.9%
6.8%
Revenue YoY
-5.2%
29.2%
Net Profit YoY
103.5%
239.8%
EPS (diluted)
$0.83
$0.40

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
LCUT
LCUT
TPB
TPB
Q4 25
$204.1M
$121.0M
Q3 25
$171.9M
$119.0M
Q2 25
$131.9M
$116.6M
Q1 25
$140.1M
$106.4M
Q4 24
$215.2M
$93.7M
Q3 24
$183.8M
$90.7M
Q2 24
$141.7M
$93.2M
Q1 24
$142.2M
$83.1M
Net Profit
LCUT
LCUT
TPB
TPB
Q4 25
$18.2M
$8.2M
Q3 25
$-1.2M
$21.1M
Q2 25
$-39.7M
$14.5M
Q1 25
$-4.2M
$14.4M
Q4 24
$8.9M
$2.4M
Q3 24
$344.0K
$12.4M
Q2 24
$-18.2M
$13.0M
Q1 24
$-6.3M
$12.0M
Gross Margin
LCUT
LCUT
TPB
TPB
Q4 25
38.6%
55.9%
Q3 25
35.1%
59.2%
Q2 25
38.6%
57.1%
Q1 25
36.1%
56.0%
Q4 24
37.7%
56.0%
Q3 24
36.7%
55.6%
Q2 24
38.5%
54.1%
Q1 24
40.5%
58.2%
Operating Margin
LCUT
LCUT
TPB
TPB
Q4 25
9.8%
16.5%
Q3 25
3.9%
21.8%
Q2 25
-28.2%
22.6%
Q1 25
0.8%
21.8%
Q4 24
7.2%
19.1%
Q3 24
4.7%
22.9%
Q2 24
0.8%
24.5%
Q1 24
1.3%
23.2%
Net Margin
LCUT
LCUT
TPB
TPB
Q4 25
8.9%
6.8%
Q3 25
-0.7%
17.7%
Q2 25
-30.1%
12.4%
Q1 25
-3.0%
13.5%
Q4 24
4.1%
2.6%
Q3 24
0.2%
13.6%
Q2 24
-12.8%
14.0%
Q1 24
-4.4%
14.5%
EPS (diluted)
LCUT
LCUT
TPB
TPB
Q4 25
$0.83
$0.40
Q3 25
$-0.05
$1.13
Q2 25
$-1.83
$0.79
Q1 25
$-0.19
$0.79
Q4 24
$0.41
$0.15
Q3 24
$0.02
$0.68
Q2 24
$-0.85
$0.68
Q1 24
$-0.29
$0.63

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
LCUT
LCUT
TPB
TPB
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$4.3M
$222.8M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$135.0M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$202.3M
$372.0M
Total Assets
$572.6M
$763.8M
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.67×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
LCUT
LCUT
TPB
TPB
Q4 25
$4.3M
$222.8M
Q3 25
$12.1M
$201.2M
Q2 25
$12.0M
$109.9M
Q1 25
$10.4M
$99.6M
Q4 24
$2.9M
$48.9M
Q3 24
$6.0M
$33.6M
Q2 24
$3.4M
$142.2M
Q1 24
$4.6M
$130.9M
Total Debt
LCUT
LCUT
TPB
TPB
Q4 25
$135.0M
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
$142.5M
Q3 24
Q2 24
Q1 24
Stockholders' Equity
LCUT
LCUT
TPB
TPB
Q4 25
$202.3M
$372.0M
Q3 25
$184.6M
$358.2M
Q2 25
$185.8M
$224.8M
Q1 25
$225.7M
$203.4M
Q4 24
$229.9M
$190.4M
Q3 24
$220.9M
$185.7M
Q2 24
$219.8M
$172.8M
Q1 24
$223.7M
$160.0M
Total Assets
LCUT
LCUT
TPB
TPB
Q4 25
$572.6M
$763.8M
Q3 25
$581.1M
$742.8M
Q2 25
$551.9M
$595.8M
Q1 25
$594.6M
$564.6M
Q4 24
$634.3M
$493.4M
Q3 24
$668.7M
$488.0M
Q2 24
$617.0M
$591.6M
Q1 24
$602.7M
$586.3M
Debt / Equity
LCUT
LCUT
TPB
TPB
Q4 25
0.67×
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
0.62×
Q3 24
Q2 24
Q1 24

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
LCUT
LCUT
TPB
TPB
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$3.7M
$24.9M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$2.6M
$21.5M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
1.3%
17.8%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
0.6%
2.8%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
0.21×
3.03×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$3.3M
$43.8M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
LCUT
LCUT
TPB
TPB
Q4 25
$3.7M
$24.9M
Q3 25
$-22.2M
$3.3M
Q2 25
$9.3M
$11.8M
Q1 25
$16.7M
$17.4M
Q4 24
$20.3M
$17.7M
Q3 24
$-22.7M
$13.2M
Q2 24
$10.4M
$13.4M
Q1 24
$10.5M
$22.6M
Free Cash Flow
LCUT
LCUT
TPB
TPB
Q4 25
$2.6M
$21.5M
Q3 25
$-22.7M
$-721.0K
Q2 25
$8.2M
$7.8M
Q1 25
$15.1M
$15.2M
Q4 24
$19.7M
$16.6M
Q3 24
$-23.2M
$12.6M
Q2 24
$9.9M
$10.9M
Q1 24
$9.9M
$22.3M
FCF Margin
LCUT
LCUT
TPB
TPB
Q4 25
1.3%
17.8%
Q3 25
-13.2%
-0.6%
Q2 25
6.2%
6.7%
Q1 25
10.8%
14.3%
Q4 24
9.1%
17.8%
Q3 24
-12.6%
13.9%
Q2 24
7.0%
11.7%
Q1 24
7.0%
26.8%
Capex Intensity
LCUT
LCUT
TPB
TPB
Q4 25
0.6%
2.8%
Q3 25
0.3%
3.4%
Q2 25
0.9%
3.4%
Q1 25
1.1%
2.1%
Q4 24
0.3%
1.2%
Q3 24
0.3%
0.7%
Q2 24
0.4%
2.7%
Q1 24
0.4%
0.4%
Cash Conversion
LCUT
LCUT
TPB
TPB
Q4 25
0.21×
3.03×
Q3 25
0.16×
Q2 25
0.82×
Q1 25
1.21×
Q4 24
2.28×
7.34×
Q3 24
-65.89×
1.07×
Q2 24
1.03×
Q1 24
1.89×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

LCUT
LCUT

Kitchenware$114.3M56%
Tableware$41.7M20%
Home Solutions$29.4M14%
Other$18.8M9%

TPB
TPB

US$111.5M92%
Non Us$9.6M8%

Related Comparisons