vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of LANDS' END, INC. (LE) and Sotera Health Co (SHC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

LANDS' END, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($317.5M vs $303.4M, roughly 1.0× Sotera Health Co). Sotera Health Co runs the higher net margin — 11.5% vs 1.6%, a 9.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Sotera Health Co posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.6% vs 0.1%). Sotera Health Co produced more free cash flow last quarter ($52.4M vs $-22.4M). Over the past eight quarters, Sotera Health Co's revenue compounded faster (10.6% CAGR vs -0.9%).

Lands' End, Inc. is an American retailer of clothing, baggage, and furniture which began as a mail-order yachting supply company in 1963 in Chicago. The company is named after Land's End; after promotional materials were printed, the founder noticed the typographical error in the location of the apostrophe, but could not afford to reprint the material. The company operates 26 domestic stores as of February 2024. Lands' End is headquartered in Dodgeville, Wisconsin.

Sotera Health Co is a global provider of end-to-end medical safety solutions. It offers sterilization services, analytical laboratory testing, and regulatory advisory support for medical device manufacturers, pharmaceutical firms, and food and consumer product companies, helping clients meet industry standards and ensure product safety for end users worldwide.

LE vs SHC — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
LE
LE
1.0× larger
LE
$317.5M
$303.4M
SHC
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
SHC
SHC
+4.5% gap
SHC
4.6%
0.1%
LE
Higher net margin
SHC
SHC
9.9% more per $
SHC
11.5%
1.6%
LE
More free cash flow
SHC
SHC
$74.8M more FCF
SHC
$52.4M
$-22.4M
LE
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
SHC
SHC
Annualised
SHC
10.6%
-0.9%
LE

Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
LE
LE
SHC
SHC
Revenue
$317.5M
$303.4M
Net Profit
$5.2M
$34.8M
Gross Margin
51.8%
54.7%
Operating Margin
5.3%
23.2%
Net Margin
1.6%
11.5%
Revenue YoY
0.1%
4.6%
Net Profit YoY
198.3%
182.8%
EPS (diluted)
$0.17
$0.12

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
LE
LE
SHC
SHC
Q4 25
$317.5M
$303.4M
Q3 25
$311.3M
Q2 25
$261.2M
$294.3M
Q1 25
$254.5M
Q4 24
$318.6M
$290.2M
Q3 24
$317.2M
$285.5M
Q2 24
$285.5M
$276.6M
Q1 24
$514.9M
$248.2M
Net Profit
LE
LE
SHC
SHC
Q4 25
$5.2M
$34.8M
Q3 25
$48.4M
Q2 25
$-8.3M
$8.0M
Q1 25
$-13.3M
Q4 24
$-593.0K
$12.3M
Q3 24
$-5.3M
$17.0M
Q2 24
$-6.4M
$8.8M
Q1 24
$-8.6M
$6.3M
Gross Margin
LE
LE
SHC
SHC
Q4 25
51.8%
54.7%
Q3 25
57.0%
Q2 25
50.8%
56.6%
Q1 25
53.2%
Q4 24
50.6%
56.6%
Q3 24
47.9%
55.4%
Q2 24
48.7%
55.2%
Q1 24
38.0%
51.2%
Operating Margin
LE
LE
SHC
SHC
Q4 25
5.3%
23.2%
Q3 25
23.4%
Q2 25
-0.9%
6.4%
Q1 25
-5.8%
Q4 24
2.9%
30.0%
Q3 24
0.8%
28.2%
Q2 24
0.8%
27.8%
Q1 24
1.6%
21.4%
Net Margin
LE
LE
SHC
SHC
Q4 25
1.6%
11.5%
Q3 25
15.5%
Q2 25
-3.2%
2.7%
Q1 25
-5.2%
Q4 24
-0.2%
4.2%
Q3 24
-1.7%
6.0%
Q2 24
-2.3%
3.2%
Q1 24
-1.7%
2.5%
EPS (diluted)
LE
LE
SHC
SHC
Q4 25
$0.17
$0.12
Q3 25
$0.17
Q2 25
$-0.27
$0.03
Q1 25
$-0.05
Q4 24
$-0.02
$0.05
Q3 24
$-0.17
$0.06
Q2 24
$-0.20
$0.03
Q1 24
$-0.27
$0.02

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
LE
LE
SHC
SHC
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$36.3M
$344.6M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$2.1B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$231.0M
$606.0M
Total Assets
$852.7M
$3.3B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
3.53×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
LE
LE
SHC
SHC
Q4 25
$36.3M
$344.6M
Q3 25
$299.2M
Q2 25
$18.1M
$332.4M
Q1 25
$304.4M
Q4 24
$30.4M
$277.2M
Q3 24
$25.6M
$306.7M
Q2 24
$27.4M
$246.1M
Q1 24
$25.3M
$261.1M
Total Debt
LE
LE
SHC
SHC
Q4 25
$2.1B
Q3 25
$2.1B
Q2 25
$2.2B
Q1 25
$2.2B
Q4 24
$2.2B
Q3 24
$2.2B
Q2 24
$2.2B
Q1 24
$2.2B
Stockholders' Equity
LE
LE
SHC
SHC
Q4 25
$231.0M
$606.0M
Q3 25
$550.5M
Q2 25
$230.1M
$511.3M
Q1 25
$414.1M
Q4 24
$223.6M
$404.9M
Q3 24
$226.5M
$470.2M
Q2 24
$234.6M
$422.8M
Q1 24
$241.6M
$429.4M
Total Assets
LE
LE
SHC
SHC
Q4 25
$852.7M
$3.3B
Q3 25
$3.2B
Q2 25
$760.5M
$3.2B
Q1 25
$3.1B
Q4 24
$843.6M
$3.1B
Q3 24
$802.5M
$3.1B
Q2 24
$800.1M
$3.1B
Q1 24
$811.5M
$3.1B
Debt / Equity
LE
LE
SHC
SHC
Q4 25
3.53×
Q3 25
3.89×
Q2 25
4.34×
Q1 25
5.36×
Q4 24
5.49×
Q3 24
4.73×
Q2 24
5.26×
Q1 24
5.19×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
LE
LE
SHC
SHC
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$-15.7M
$103.1M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$-22.4M
$52.4M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
-7.1%
17.3%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
2.1%
16.7%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
-3.03×
2.96×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$-55.0M
$149.2M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
LE
LE
SHC
SHC
Q4 25
$-15.7M
$103.1M
Q3 25
$71.2M
Q2 25
$-22.5M
$57.4M
Q1 25
$55.5M
Q4 24
$-17.1M
$55.7M
Q3 24
$30.7M
$97.5M
Q2 24
$-25.8M
$61.3M
Q1 24
$93.9M
$9.7M
Free Cash Flow
LE
LE
SHC
SHC
Q4 25
$-22.4M
$52.4M
Q3 25
$35.0M
Q2 25
$-30.7M
$26.2M
Q1 25
$35.6M
Q4 24
$-27.8M
$-10.2M
Q3 24
$26.0M
$61.1M
Q2 24
$-32.6M
$19.4M
Q1 24
$87.5M
$-25.2M
FCF Margin
LE
LE
SHC
SHC
Q4 25
-7.1%
17.3%
Q3 25
11.2%
Q2 25
-11.8%
8.9%
Q1 25
14.0%
Q4 24
-8.7%
-3.5%
Q3 24
8.2%
21.4%
Q2 24
-11.4%
7.0%
Q1 24
17.0%
-10.2%
Capex Intensity
LE
LE
SHC
SHC
Q4 25
2.1%
16.7%
Q3 25
11.6%
Q2 25
3.2%
10.6%
Q1 25
7.8%
Q4 24
3.3%
22.7%
Q3 24
1.5%
12.7%
Q2 24
2.4%
15.2%
Q1 24
1.2%
14.1%
Cash Conversion
LE
LE
SHC
SHC
Q4 25
-3.03×
2.96×
Q3 25
1.47×
Q2 25
7.21×
Q1 25
Q4 24
4.52×
Q3 24
5.73×
Q2 24
7.00×
Q1 24
1.53×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

LE
LE

U Se Commerce$179.8M57%
Business Outfitters Revenue$78.8M25%
Licensing And Retail$20.2M6%
Other$19.8M6%
Third Party$18.9M6%

SHC
SHC

Transferred At Point In Time$198.4M65%
Nelson Labs$55.2M18%
Nordion$49.8M16%

Related Comparisons