vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of LANDS' END, INC. (LE) and TANDEM DIABETES CARE INC (TNDM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
LANDS' END, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($317.5M vs $290.4M, roughly 1.1× TANDEM DIABETES CARE INC). LANDS' END, INC. runs the higher net margin — 1.6% vs -0.2%, a 1.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, TANDEM DIABETES CARE INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.7% vs 0.1%). TANDEM DIABETES CARE INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($3.1M vs $-22.4M). Over the past eight quarters, TANDEM DIABETES CARE INC's revenue compounded faster (23.1% CAGR vs -0.9%).
Lands' End, Inc. is an American retailer of clothing, baggage, and furniture which began as a mail-order yachting supply company in 1963 in Chicago. The company is named after Land's End; after promotional materials were printed, the founder noticed the typographical error in the location of the apostrophe, but could not afford to reprint the material. The company operates 26 domestic stores as of February 2024. Lands' End is headquartered in Dodgeville, Wisconsin.
Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. is an American medical device manufacturer based in San Diego, California. The company develops medical technologies for the treatment of diabetes and specifically insulin infusion therapy.
LE vs TNDM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $317.5M | $290.4M |
| Net Profit | $5.2M | $-589.0K |
| Gross Margin | 51.8% | 57.7% |
| Operating Margin | 5.3% | 2.9% |
| Net Margin | 1.6% | -0.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.1% | 2.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 198.3% | -178.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.17 | $0.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $317.5M | $290.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $249.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $261.2M | $240.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $234.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $318.6M | $282.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $317.2M | $244.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $285.5M | $221.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $514.9M | $191.7M |
| Q4 25 | $5.2M | $-589.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-21.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-8.3M | $-52.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-130.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-593.0K | $755.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-5.3M | $-23.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-6.4M | $-30.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-8.6M | $-42.7M |
| Q4 25 | 51.8% | 57.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 53.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 50.8% | 52.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 50.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 50.6% | 55.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 47.9% | 51.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 48.7% | 50.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 38.0% | 49.4% |
| Q4 25 | 5.3% | 2.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -9.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.9% | -21.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -51.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.9% | -0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.8% | -10.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.8% | -13.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.6% | -21.7% |
| Q4 25 | 1.6% | -0.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -8.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.2% | -21.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -55.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.2% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.7% | -9.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.3% | -13.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.7% | -22.3% |
| Q4 25 | $0.17 | $0.02 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.31 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.27 | $-0.78 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-1.97 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.02 | $0.00 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.17 | $-0.35 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.20 | $-0.47 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.27 | $-0.65 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $36.3M | $292.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $231.0M | $155.2M |
| Total Assets | $852.7M | $881.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $36.3M | $292.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $319.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.1M | $315.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $368.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.4M | $438.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.6M | $473.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.4M | $452.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $25.3M | $467.8M |
| Q4 25 | $231.0M | $155.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $133.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $230.1M | $133.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $155.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $223.6M | $263.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $226.5M | $237.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $234.6M | $233.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $241.6M | $243.1M |
| Q4 25 | $852.7M | $881.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $874.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $760.5M | $875.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $922.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $843.6M | $967.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $802.5M | $957.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $800.1M | $937.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $811.5M | $941.0M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-15.7M | $9.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-22.4M | $3.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -7.1% | 1.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.1% | 2.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -3.03× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-55.0M | $-29.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-15.7M | $9.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $8.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-22.5M | $-9.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-18.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-17.1M | $10.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $30.7M | $26.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-25.8M | $-5.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $93.9M | $-8.0M |
| Q4 25 | $-22.4M | $3.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-30.7M | $-15.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-21.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-27.8M | $7.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.0M | $21.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-32.6M | $-11.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $87.5M | $-12.5M |
| Q4 25 | -7.1% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -11.8% | -6.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -9.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -8.7% | 2.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.2% | 8.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -11.4% | -5.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 17.0% | -6.5% |
| Q4 25 | 2.1% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.2% | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.5% | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.4% | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.2% | 2.3% |
| Q4 25 | -3.03× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 14.19× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LE
| U Se Commerce | $179.8M | 57% |
| Business Outfitters Revenue | $78.8M | 25% |
| Licensing And Retail | $20.2M | 6% |
| Other | $19.8M | 6% |
| Third Party | $18.9M | 6% |
TNDM
| Supplies And Other | $150.3M | 52% |
| Pump | $140.1M | 48% |
