vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of LEAR CORP (LEA) and LPL Financial Holdings Inc. (LPLA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
LEAR CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($6.0B vs $4.9B, roughly 1.2× LPL Financial Holdings Inc.). LPL Financial Holdings Inc. runs the higher net margin — 6.1% vs 1.4%, a 4.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, LPL Financial Holdings Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (40.4% vs 4.8%). LPL Financial Holdings Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($613.3M vs $281.1M). Over the past eight quarters, LPL Financial Holdings Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (32.0% CAGR vs -0.1%).
Lear Corporation is an American company that manufactures automotive seating and electrical systems. In 2019, it ranked #147 and in 2018, it ranked #148 on the Fortune 500 list.
LPL Financial Holdings Inc. was founded in 1989 and is considered the largest independent broker-dealer in the United States. As of 2021 the company had more than 17,500 financial advisors, over US$1 trillion in advisory and brokerage assets, and generated approximately $10.3 billion in annual revenue for the 2023 fiscal year. LPL Financial has main offices in Boston, Fort Mill, Austin, and San Diego. The company is a member of FINRA and the SIPC.
LEA vs LPLA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $6.0B | $4.9B |
| Net Profit | $82.7M | $300.7M |
| Gross Margin | 5.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | 2.6% | 8.1% |
| Net Margin | 1.4% | 6.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.8% | 40.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -6.1% | 11.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.58 | $3.65 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $6.0B | $4.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.7B | $4.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.0B | $3.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.6B | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.7B | $3.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.6B | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.0B | $2.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.0B | $2.8B |
| Q4 25 | $82.7M | $300.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $108.2M | $-29.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $165.2M | $273.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $80.7M | $318.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $88.1M | $270.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $135.8M | $255.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $173.1M | $243.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $109.6M | $288.8M |
| Q4 25 | 5.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.6% | 8.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.4% | -0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.1% | 9.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.3% | 11.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.7% | 9.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.9% | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.3% | 11.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.3% | 13.2% |
| Q4 25 | 1.4% | 6.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.9% | -0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.7% | 7.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.5% | 8.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.5% | 7.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.4% | 8.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.9% | 8.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.8% | 10.2% |
| Q4 25 | $1.58 | $3.65 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.02 | $-0.37 | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.06 | $3.40 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.49 | $4.24 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.64 | $3.58 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.41 | $3.39 | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.02 | $3.23 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.90 | $3.83 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.0B | $1.1B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.7B | $7.3B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $5.0B | $5.3B |
| Total Assets | $14.8B | $18.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.54× | 1.36× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.0B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $887.9M | $4.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $779.9M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $763.9M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $950.3M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $930.4M | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | $7.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8B | $7.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8B | $7.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.7B | $5.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.7B | $5.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.8B | $4.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $4.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.7B | $3.9B |
| Q4 25 | $5.0B | $5.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.1B | $5.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.1B | $5.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.7B | $3.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.5B | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.8B | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.8B | $2.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.9B | $2.3B |
| Q4 25 | $14.8B | $18.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.2B | $18.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.3B | $17.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.6B | $14.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.0B | $13.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.8B | $11.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.7B | $11.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $14.9B | $11.0B |
| Q4 25 | 0.54× | 1.36× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.54× | 1.49× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.54× | 1.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.59× | 1.82× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.61× | 1.87× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.58× | 1.60× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.57× | 1.77× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.56× | 1.70× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $475.9M | $785.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $281.1M | $613.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 4.7% | 12.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.3% | 3.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.75× | 2.61× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $527.2M | $-981.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $475.9M | $785.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $444.4M | $-1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $296.2M | $193.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-127.7M | $339.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $680.8M | $-178.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $182.7M | $209.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $291.2M | $-178.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-34.6M | $425.9M |
| Q4 25 | $281.1M | $613.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $307.0M | $-1.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $170.8M | $56.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-231.7M | $220.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $488.7M | $-344.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $50.5M | $62.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $170.4M | $-307.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-148.2M | $304.9M |
| Q4 25 | 4.7% | 12.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.4% | -41.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.8% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.2% | 6.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.6% | -9.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.8% | -10.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.5% | 10.8% |
| Q4 25 | 3.3% | 3.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.4% | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.1% | 3.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.9% | 3.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.4% | 4.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.4% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.0% | 4.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.9% | 4.3% |
| Q4 25 | 5.75× | 2.61× | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.11× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.79× | 0.71× | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.58× | 1.07× | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.73× | -0.66× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.35× | 0.82× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.68× | -0.73× | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.32× | 1.47× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LEA
| Other | $3.5B | 59% |
| Seating Segment | $1.9B | 32% |
| E Systems Segment | $520.6M | 9% |
LPLA
Segment breakdown not available.