vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of LEAR CORP (LEA) and Omnicom Group (OMC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Omnicom Group is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($6.2B vs $6.0B, roughly 1.0× LEAR CORP). Omnicom Group runs the higher net margin — 6.7% vs 1.4%, a 5.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, LEAR CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.8% vs -16.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Omnicom Group's revenue compounded faster (27.3% CAGR vs -0.1%).
Lear Corporation is an American company that manufactures automotive seating and electrical systems. In 2019, it ranked #147 and in 2018, it ranked #148 on the Fortune 500 list.
Omnicom Group Inc. is an American global media, marketing, and corporate communications holding company, headquartered in New York City.
LEA vs OMC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $6.0B | $6.2B |
| Net Profit | $82.7M | $418.7M |
| Gross Margin | 5.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | 2.6% | 10.4% |
| Net Margin | 1.4% | 6.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.8% | -16.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -6.1% | 436.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.58 | $1.35 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $6.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.0B | $5.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.7B | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.0B | $4.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.6B | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.7B | $4.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.6B | $3.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.0B | $3.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | $418.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $82.7M | $-941.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $108.2M | $341.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $165.2M | $257.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $80.7M | $287.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $88.1M | $448.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $135.8M | $385.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $173.1M | $328.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.7% | -10.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.4% | 18.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.3% | 16.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.5% | 17.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.8% | 19.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.3% | 19.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.5% | 17.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 10.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.6% | -17.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.4% | 13.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.1% | 10.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.3% | 12.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.7% | 15.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.9% | 15.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.3% | 13.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | 6.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.4% | -17.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.9% | 8.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.7% | 6.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.5% | 7.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.5% | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.4% | 9.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.9% | 8.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.35 | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.58 | $-4.78 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.02 | $1.75 | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.06 | $1.31 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.49 | $1.45 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.64 | $2.27 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.41 | $1.95 | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.02 | $1.65 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.0B | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.7B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $5.0B | — |
| Total Assets | $14.8B | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.54× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $887.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $779.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $763.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $950.3M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | $9.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.7B | $6.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.0B | $12.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.1B | $4.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.1B | $4.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.7B | $4.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.5B | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.8B | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.8B | $3.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $14.8B | $54.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.2B | $28.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.3B | $28.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.6B | $28.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.0B | $29.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.8B | $28.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.7B | $27.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.54× | 0.77× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.54× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.54× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.59× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.61× | 1.45× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.58× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.57× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $475.9M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $281.1M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 4.7% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.3% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.75× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $527.2M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $475.9M | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $444.4M | $477.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $296.2M | $210.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-127.7M | $-786.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $680.8M | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $182.7M | $568.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $291.2M | $-141.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $281.1M | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $307.0M | $438.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $170.8M | $168.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-231.7M | $-816.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $488.7M | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $50.5M | $537.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $170.4M | $-180.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.7% | 54.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.4% | 10.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.8% | 4.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.2% | -22.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.6% | 43.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | 13.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.8% | -4.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.3% | 0.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.4% | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.1% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.9% | 0.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.4% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.4% | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.0% | 1.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.75× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.11× | 1.40× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.79× | 0.82× | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.58× | -2.73× | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.73× | 4.30× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.35× | 1.47× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.68× | -0.43× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LEA
| Other | $3.5B | 59% |
| Seating Segment | $1.9B | 32% |
| E Systems Segment | $520.6M | 9% |
OMC
Segment breakdown not available.
