vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of LEAR CORP (LEA) and PATRICK INDUSTRIES INC (PATK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

LEAR CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($6.0B vs $924.2M, roughly 6.5× PATRICK INDUSTRIES INC). PATRICK INDUSTRIES INC runs the higher net margin — 3.1% vs 1.4%, a 1.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, PATRICK INDUSTRIES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.2% vs 4.8%). LEAR CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($281.1M vs $112.7M). Over the past eight quarters, LEAR CORP's revenue compounded faster (-0.1% CAGR vs -0.5%).

Lear Corporation is an American company that manufactures automotive seating and electrical systems. In 2019, it ranked #147 and in 2018, it ranked #148 on the Fortune 500 list.

Anduril Industries, Inc. is an American defense technology company specializing in the development of advanced autonomous systems.

LEA vs PATK — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
LEA
LEA
6.5× larger
LEA
$6.0B
$924.2M
PATK
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
PATK
PATK
+4.4% gap
PATK
9.2%
4.8%
LEA
Higher net margin
PATK
PATK
1.8% more per $
PATK
3.1%
1.4%
LEA
More free cash flow
LEA
LEA
$168.4M more FCF
LEA
$281.1M
$112.7M
PATK
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
LEA
LEA
Annualised
LEA
-0.1%
-0.5%
PATK

Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q4 2025

Metric
LEA
LEA
PATK
PATK
Revenue
$6.0B
$924.2M
Net Profit
$82.7M
$29.1M
Gross Margin
5.7%
23.0%
Operating Margin
2.6%
6.2%
Net Margin
1.4%
3.1%
Revenue YoY
4.8%
9.2%
Net Profit YoY
-6.1%
99.7%
EPS (diluted)
$1.58
$0.82

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
LEA
LEA
PATK
PATK
Q4 25
$6.0B
$924.2M
Q3 25
$5.7B
$975.6M
Q2 25
$6.0B
$1.0B
Q1 25
$5.6B
$1.0B
Q4 24
$5.7B
$846.1M
Q3 24
$5.6B
$919.4M
Q2 24
$6.0B
$1.0B
Q1 24
$6.0B
$933.5M
Net Profit
LEA
LEA
PATK
PATK
Q4 25
$82.7M
$29.1M
Q3 25
$108.2M
$35.3M
Q2 25
$165.2M
$32.4M
Q1 25
$80.7M
$38.2M
Q4 24
$88.1M
$14.6M
Q3 24
$135.8M
$40.9M
Q2 24
$173.1M
$47.9M
Q1 24
$109.6M
$35.1M
Gross Margin
LEA
LEA
PATK
PATK
Q4 25
5.7%
23.0%
Q3 25
6.4%
22.6%
Q2 25
7.3%
23.9%
Q1 25
6.5%
22.8%
Q4 24
6.8%
22.1%
Q3 24
7.3%
23.1%
Q2 24
7.5%
22.8%
Q1 24
6.6%
21.9%
Operating Margin
LEA
LEA
PATK
PATK
Q4 25
2.6%
6.2%
Q3 25
3.4%
6.8%
Q2 25
4.1%
8.3%
Q1 25
3.3%
6.5%
Q4 24
3.7%
4.7%
Q3 24
3.9%
8.1%
Q2 24
4.3%
8.3%
Q1 24
3.3%
6.4%
Net Margin
LEA
LEA
PATK
PATK
Q4 25
1.4%
3.1%
Q3 25
1.9%
3.6%
Q2 25
2.7%
3.1%
Q1 25
1.5%
3.8%
Q4 24
1.5%
1.7%
Q3 24
2.4%
4.4%
Q2 24
2.9%
4.7%
Q1 24
1.8%
3.8%
EPS (diluted)
LEA
LEA
PATK
PATK
Q4 25
$1.58
$0.82
Q3 25
$2.02
$1.01
Q2 25
$3.06
$0.96
Q1 25
$1.49
$1.11
Q4 24
$1.64
$-1.44
Q3 24
$2.41
$1.80
Q2 24
$3.02
$2.16
Q1 24
$1.90
$1.59

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
LEA
LEA
PATK
PATK
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$1.0B
$26.4M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$2.7B
$1.3B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$5.0B
$1.2B
Total Assets
$14.8B
$3.1B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.54×
1.10×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
LEA
LEA
PATK
PATK
Q4 25
$1.0B
$26.4M
Q3 25
$1.0B
$20.7M
Q2 25
$887.9M
$22.0M
Q1 25
$779.9M
$86.6M
Q4 24
$1.1B
$33.6M
Q3 24
$763.9M
$52.6M
Q2 24
$950.3M
$44.0M
Q1 24
$930.4M
$17.6M
Total Debt
LEA
LEA
PATK
PATK
Q4 25
$2.7B
$1.3B
Q3 25
$2.8B
Q2 25
$2.8B
Q1 25
$2.7B
Q4 24
$2.7B
$1.3B
Q3 24
$2.8B
Q2 24
$2.7B
Q1 24
$2.7B
Stockholders' Equity
LEA
LEA
PATK
PATK
Q4 25
$5.0B
$1.2B
Q3 25
$5.1B
$1.2B
Q2 25
$5.1B
$1.1B
Q1 25
$4.7B
$1.1B
Q4 24
$4.5B
$1.1B
Q3 24
$4.8B
$1.1B
Q2 24
$4.8B
$1.1B
Q1 24
$4.9B
$1.1B
Total Assets
LEA
LEA
PATK
PATK
Q4 25
$14.8B
$3.1B
Q3 25
$15.2B
$3.1B
Q2 25
$15.3B
$3.1B
Q1 25
$14.6B
$3.2B
Q4 24
$14.0B
$3.0B
Q3 24
$14.8B
$3.1B
Q2 24
$14.7B
$3.0B
Q1 24
$14.9B
$3.0B
Debt / Equity
LEA
LEA
PATK
PATK
Q4 25
0.54×
1.10×
Q3 25
0.54×
Q2 25
0.54×
Q1 25
0.59×
Q4 24
0.61×
1.18×
Q3 24
0.58×
Q2 24
0.57×
Q1 24
0.56×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
LEA
LEA
PATK
PATK
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$475.9M
$130.8M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$281.1M
$112.7M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
4.7%
12.2%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
3.3%
2.0%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
5.75×
4.50×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$527.2M
$246.5M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
LEA
LEA
PATK
PATK
Q4 25
$475.9M
$130.8M
Q3 25
$444.4M
$9.1M
Q2 25
$296.2M
$149.4M
Q1 25
$-127.7M
$40.1M
Q4 24
$680.8M
$102.7M
Q3 24
$182.7M
$51.5M
Q2 24
$291.2M
$137.5M
Q1 24
$-34.6M
$35.2M
Free Cash Flow
LEA
LEA
PATK
PATK
Q4 25
$281.1M
$112.7M
Q3 25
$307.0M
$-17.2M
Q2 25
$170.8M
$131.1M
Q1 25
$-231.7M
$19.9M
Q4 24
$488.7M
$77.2M
Q3 24
$50.5M
$33.7M
Q2 24
$170.4M
$120.6M
Q1 24
$-148.2M
$19.7M
FCF Margin
LEA
LEA
PATK
PATK
Q4 25
4.7%
12.2%
Q3 25
5.4%
-1.8%
Q2 25
2.8%
12.5%
Q1 25
-4.2%
2.0%
Q4 24
8.6%
9.1%
Q3 24
0.9%
3.7%
Q2 24
2.8%
11.9%
Q1 24
-2.5%
2.1%
Capex Intensity
LEA
LEA
PATK
PATK
Q4 25
3.3%
2.0%
Q3 25
2.4%
2.7%
Q2 25
2.1%
1.7%
Q1 25
1.9%
2.0%
Q4 24
3.4%
3.0%
Q3 24
2.4%
1.9%
Q2 24
2.0%
1.7%
Q1 24
1.9%
1.7%
Cash Conversion
LEA
LEA
PATK
PATK
Q4 25
5.75×
4.50×
Q3 25
4.11×
0.26×
Q2 25
1.79×
4.61×
Q1 25
-1.58×
1.05×
Q4 24
7.73×
7.05×
Q3 24
1.35×
1.26×
Q2 24
1.68×
2.87×
Q1 24
-0.32×
1.00×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

LEA
LEA

Other$3.5B59%
Seating Segment$1.9B32%
E Systems Segment$520.6M9%

PATK
PATK

Recreational Vehicle$276.3M30%
Distribution$222.4M24%
Marine$141.9M15%
Industrial$110.8M12%
Powersports$104.8M11%
Manufactured Housing$67.9M7%

Related Comparisons