vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of LEAR CORP (LEA) and TELUS CORP (TU). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
LEAR CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($6.0B vs $3.7B, roughly 1.6× TELUS CORP). LEAR CORP runs the higher net margin — 1.4% vs -4.8%, a 6.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, LEAR CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.8% vs 2.2%).
Lear Corporation is an American company that manufactures automotive seating and electrical systems. In 2019, it ranked #147 and in 2018, it ranked #148 on the Fortune 500 list.
TELUS CORPTUEarnings & Financial Report
Telus Corporation is a Canadian publicly traded holding company and conglomerate, headquartered in Vancouver, British Columbia, which is the parent company of several subsidiaries: Telus Communications offers telephony, television, data and Internet services; Telus Mobility offers wireless services; Telus Health operates companies that provide health products and services; and Telus Digital operates worldwide, providing multilingual customer service outsourcing and digital IT services. Telus ...
LEA vs TU — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $6.0B | $3.7B |
| Net Profit | $82.7M | $-178.8M |
| Gross Margin | 5.7% | 90.2% |
| Operating Margin | 2.6% | 3.4% |
| Net Margin | 1.4% | -4.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.8% | 2.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -6.1% | -210.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.58 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $6.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.7B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.0B | $3.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.6B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.7B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.0B | $3.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.0B | — |
| Q4 25 | $82.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $108.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $165.2M | $-178.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $80.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $88.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $135.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $173.1M | $161.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $109.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | 5.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.3% | 90.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.5% | 87.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.1% | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.3% | 13.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.7% | -4.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.9% | 4.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.58 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.02 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.06 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.49 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.64 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.41 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.02 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.90 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.0B | $2.7B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.7B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $5.0B | $11.8B |
| Total Assets | $14.8B | $44.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.54× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $887.9M | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $779.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $763.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $950.3M | $676.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $930.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.7B | — |
| Q4 25 | $5.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.1B | $11.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.7B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.8B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.8B | $12.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.9B | — |
| Q4 25 | $14.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.3B | $44.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.6B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.8B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.7B | $41.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $14.9B | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.54× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.54× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.54× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.59× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.61× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.58× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.57× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.56× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $475.9M | $851.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $281.1M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 4.7% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.3% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.75× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $527.2M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $475.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $444.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $296.2M | $851.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-127.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $680.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $182.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $291.2M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $-34.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | $281.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $307.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $170.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-231.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $488.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $50.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $170.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-148.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 3.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | 5.75× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.11× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.79× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.58× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.73× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.35× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.68× | 6.28× | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.32× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LEA
| Other | $3.5B | 59% |
| Seating Segment | $1.9B | 32% |
| E Systems Segment | $520.6M | 9% |
TU
Segment breakdown not available.
