vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of LEAR CORP (LEA) and Vistra Corp. (VST). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
LEAR CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($6.0B vs $4.8B, roughly 1.2× Vistra Corp.). Vistra Corp. runs the higher net margin — 4.8% vs 1.4%, a 3.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Vistra Corp. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (31.2% vs 4.8%). Vistra Corp. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($596.0M vs $281.1M). Over the past eight quarters, Vistra Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (23.3% CAGR vs -0.1%).
Lear Corporation is an American company that manufactures automotive seating and electrical systems. In 2019, it ranked #147 and in 2018, it ranked #148 on the Fortune 500 list.
Vistra may refer to either of two companies:Vistra, a corporate services company based in Hong Kong Vistra Corp, an energy company based in Texas
LEA vs VST — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $6.0B | $4.8B |
| Net Profit | $82.7M | $233.0M |
| Gross Margin | 5.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | 2.6% | 9.9% |
| Net Margin | 1.4% | 4.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.8% | 31.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -6.1% | -47.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.58 | $0.55 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $6.0B | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.7B | $4.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.0B | $3.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.6B | $4.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.7B | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.6B | $4.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.0B | $3.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.0B | $3.2B |
| Q4 25 | $82.7M | $233.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $108.2M | $652.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $165.2M | $327.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $80.7M | $-268.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $88.1M | $441.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $135.8M | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $173.1M | $365.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $109.6M | $-35.0M |
| Q4 25 | 5.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.6% | 9.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.4% | 21.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.1% | 13.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.3% | -2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.7% | 16.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.9% | 59.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.3% | 22.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.3% | 2.7% |
| Q4 25 | 1.4% | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.9% | 13.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.7% | 8.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.5% | -6.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.5% | 12.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.4% | 43.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.9% | 10.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.8% | -1.1% |
| Q4 25 | $1.58 | $0.55 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.02 | $1.75 | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.06 | $0.81 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.49 | $-0.93 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.64 | $1.09 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.41 | $5.25 | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.02 | $0.90 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.90 | $-0.24 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.0B | $785.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.7B | $15.8B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $5.0B | $5.1B |
| Total Assets | $14.8B | $41.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.54× | 3.11× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.0B | $785.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $602.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $887.9M | $458.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $779.9M | $561.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $763.9M | $905.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $950.3M | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $930.4M | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | $15.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8B | $15.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8B | $15.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.7B | $15.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.7B | $15.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.8B | $13.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $13.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.7B | $14.7B |
| Q4 25 | $5.0B | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.1B | $5.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.1B | $4.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.7B | $4.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.5B | $5.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.8B | $5.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.8B | $5.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.9B | $5.7B |
| Q4 25 | $14.8B | $41.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.2B | $38.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.3B | $38.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.6B | $38.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.0B | $37.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.8B | $37.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.7B | $39.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $14.9B | $38.2B |
| Q4 25 | 0.54× | 3.11× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.54× | 3.02× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.54× | 3.22× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.59× | 3.20× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.61× | 2.77× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.58× | 2.56× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.57× | 2.49× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.56× | 2.60× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $475.9M | $1.4B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $281.1M | $596.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 4.7% | 12.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.3% | 17.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.75× | 6.15× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $527.2M | $1.3B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $475.9M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $444.4M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $296.2M | $572.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-127.7M | $599.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $680.8M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $182.7M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $291.2M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $-34.6M | $312.0M |
| Q4 25 | $281.1M | $596.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $307.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $170.8M | $-118.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-231.7M | $-169.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $488.7M | $923.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $50.5M | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $170.4M | $698.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-148.2M | $-153.0M |
| Q4 25 | 4.7% | 12.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.4% | 21.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.8% | -3.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.2% | -4.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.6% | 25.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | 23.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.8% | 19.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.5% | -4.8% |
| Q4 25 | 3.3% | 17.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.4% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.1% | 18.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.9% | 18.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.4% | 11.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.4% | 15.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.0% | 13.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.9% | 14.7% |
| Q4 25 | 5.75× | 6.15× | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.11× | 2.25× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.79× | 1.75× | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.58× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.73× | 3.07× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.35× | 0.90× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.68× | 3.28× | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.32× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LEA
| Other | $3.5B | 59% |
| Seating Segment | $1.9B | 32% |
| E Systems Segment | $520.6M | 9% |
VST
| Retail Energy Charge In ERCOT | $2.1B | 43% |
| Retail Energy Charge In Northeast Midwest | $1.2B | 24% |
| East Segment | $1.1B | 24% |
| Hedging Revenue Realized | $170.0M | 4% |
| Revenue From Other Wholesale Contracts | $116.0M | 2% |
| Transferable Production Tax Credit Revenues | $78.0M | 2% |
| West Segment | $77.0M | 2% |
| Intersegment Sales | $25.0M | 1% |
