vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of LEAR CORP (LEA) and WHIRLPOOL CORP (WHR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
LEAR CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($6.0B vs $4.1B, roughly 1.5× WHIRLPOOL CORP). WHIRLPOOL CORP runs the higher net margin — 2.7% vs 1.4%, a 1.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, LEAR CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.8% vs -0.9%). WHIRLPOOL CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($989.0M vs $281.1M). Over the past eight quarters, LEAR CORP's revenue compounded faster (-0.1% CAGR vs -4.5%).
Lear Corporation is an American company that manufactures automotive seating and electrical systems. In 2019, it ranked #147 and in 2018, it ranked #148 on the Fortune 500 list.
Whirlpool Corporation is an American multinational manufacturer and marketer of home appliances headquartered in Benton Charter Township, Michigan, United States. In 2023, the Fortune 500 company had an annual revenue of approximately $19 billion in sales, around 59,000 employees, and more than 55 manufacturing and technology research centers globally.
LEA vs WHR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $6.0B | $4.1B |
| Net Profit | $82.7M | $109.0M |
| Gross Margin | 5.7% | 14.0% |
| Operating Margin | 2.6% | 6.0% |
| Net Margin | 1.4% | 2.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.8% | -0.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -6.1% | 127.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.58 | $1.92 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $6.0B | $4.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.7B | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.0B | $3.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.6B | $3.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.7B | $4.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.6B | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.0B | $4.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.0B | $4.5B |
| Q4 25 | $82.7M | $109.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $108.2M | $73.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $165.2M | $65.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $80.7M | $71.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $88.1M | $-392.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $135.8M | $109.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $173.1M | $219.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $109.6M | $-259.0M |
| Q4 25 | 5.7% | 14.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.4% | 14.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.3% | 16.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.5% | 16.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.8% | 16.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.3% | 16.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.5% | 15.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.6% | 14.3% |
| Q4 25 | 2.6% | 6.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.4% | 5.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.1% | 5.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.3% | 5.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.7% | -3.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.9% | 6.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.3% | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.3% | -2.6% |
| Q4 25 | 1.4% | 2.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.9% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.7% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.5% | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.5% | -9.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.4% | 2.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.9% | 5.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.8% | -5.8% |
| Q4 25 | $1.58 | $1.92 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.02 | $1.29 | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.06 | $1.17 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.49 | $1.28 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.64 | $-7.11 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.41 | $2.00 | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.02 | $3.96 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.90 | $-4.72 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.0B | $669.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.7B | $6.2B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $5.0B | $2.7B |
| Total Assets | $14.8B | $16.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.54× | 2.26× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.0B | $669.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $934.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $887.9M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $779.9M | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $763.9M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $950.3M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $930.4M | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | $6.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.7B | $6.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.7B | — |
| Q4 25 | $5.0B | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.1B | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.1B | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.7B | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.5B | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.8B | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.8B | $3.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.9B | $2.4B |
| Q4 25 | $14.8B | $16.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.2B | $16.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.3B | $16.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.6B | $16.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.0B | $16.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.8B | $17.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.7B | $17.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $14.9B | $17.4B |
| Q4 25 | 0.54× | 2.26× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.54× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.54× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.59× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.61× | 2.46× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.58× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.57× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.56× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $475.9M | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $281.1M | $989.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 4.7% | 24.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.3% | 3.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.75× | 10.45× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $527.2M | $81.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $475.9M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $444.4M | $33.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $296.2M | $19.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-127.7M | $-721.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $680.8M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $182.7M | $214.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $291.2M | $388.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-34.6M | $-873.0M |
| Q4 25 | $281.1M | $989.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $307.0M | $-52.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $170.8M | $-63.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-231.7M | $-793.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $488.7M | $970.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $50.5M | $127.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $170.4M | $275.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-148.2M | $-988.0M |
| Q4 25 | 4.7% | 24.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.4% | -1.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.8% | -1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.2% | -21.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.6% | 23.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.8% | 6.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.5% | -22.0% |
| Q4 25 | 3.3% | 3.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.4% | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.1% | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.9% | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.4% | 3.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.4% | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.0% | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.9% | 2.6% |
| Q4 25 | 5.75× | 10.45× | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.11× | 0.45× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.79× | 0.29× | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.58× | -10.15× | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.73× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.35× | 1.96× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.68× | 1.77× | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.32× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LEA
| Other | $3.5B | 59% |
| Seating Segment | $1.9B | 32% |
| E Systems Segment | $520.6M | 9% |
WHR
| Refrigeration | $1.2B | 30% |
| Laundry | $1.1B | 27% |
| Cooking | $1.1B | 26% |
| Dishwashing | $299.0M | 7% |
| Other | $266.0M | 6% |
| Spare Parts And Warranties | $139.0M | 3% |
