vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of LEGGETT & PLATT INC (LEG) and Science Applications International Corp (SAIC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Science Applications International Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.9B vs $938.6M, roughly 2.0× LEGGETT & PLATT INC). Science Applications International Corp runs the higher net margin — 4.2% vs 2.7%, a 1.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Science Applications International Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.6% vs -11.2%). Science Applications International Corp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($120.0M vs $101.9M). Over the past eight quarters, Science Applications International Corp's revenue compounded faster (2.3% CAGR vs -7.5%).
LEGGETT & PLATT INCLEGEarnings & Financial Report
Leggett & Platt (L&P), based in Carthage, Missouri, is an American diversified manufacturer that designs and produces various engineered components and products that can be found in homes and automobiles. The firm was founded in 1883, and consists of 15 business units, 20,000 employee-partners, and 135 manufacturing facilities located in 18 countries.
Science Applications International Corporation, Inc. (SAIC) is an American technology company headquartered in Reston, Virginia that provides government services and information technology support.
LEG vs SAIC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $938.6M | $1.9B |
| Net Profit | $25.1M | $78.0M |
| Gross Margin | 17.9% | 12.2% |
| Operating Margin | 2.0% | 6.9% |
| Net Margin | 2.7% | 4.2% |
| Revenue YoY | -11.2% | 2.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 76.8% | -3.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.18 | $1.69 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $938.6M | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | $1.7B |
| Q4 25 | $25.1M | $78.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $127.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $52.5M | $68.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.2M | $106.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $44.9M | $81.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-602.2M | $77.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $31.6M | $39.0M |
| Q4 25 | 17.9% | 12.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.2% | 11.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.6% | 12.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.2% | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.5% | 11.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 17.0% | 11.1% |
| Q4 25 | 2.0% | 6.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.8% | 6.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.4% | 8.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.2% | 7.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -56.2% | 7.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.9% | 4.5% |
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 4.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.0% | 3.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.3% | 5.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.1% | 4.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -53.4% | 4.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.9% | 2.2% |
| Q4 25 | $0.18 | $1.69 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.91 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.38 | $1.42 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.22 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.10 | $2.13 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.33 | $1.58 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.39 | $1.48 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.23 | $0.77 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $587.4M | $45.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.5B | $2.5B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.0B | $1.5B |
| Total Assets | $3.5B | $5.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.46× | 1.64× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $587.4M | $45.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $460.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $368.8M | $47.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $412.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $350.2M | $46.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $277.2M | $48.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $307.0M | $49.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $361.3M | $94.0M |
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | $2.1B |
| Q4 25 | $1.0B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $971.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $855.0M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $746.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $689.4M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $741.0M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $667.6M | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.3B | $1.8B |
| Q4 25 | $3.5B | $5.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7B | $5.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7B | $5.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.8B | $5.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.8B | $5.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.6B | $5.3B |
| Q4 25 | 1.46× | 1.64× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.54× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.10× | 1.52× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.59× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.70× | 1.34× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.13× | 1.33× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.55× | 1.18× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.38× | 1.18× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $121.5M | $129.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $101.9M | $120.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 10.9% | 6.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.1% | 0.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.84× | 1.65× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $281.0M | $478.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $121.5M | $129.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $125.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $84.0M | $100.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $122.3M | $143.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $95.5M | $138.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $94.0M | $98.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-6.1M | $63.0M |
| Q4 25 | $101.9M | $120.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $110.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $75.5M | $92.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-6.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $100.5M | $134.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $77.1M | $132.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $78.5M | $92.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-32.0M | $52.0M |
| Q4 25 | 10.9% | 6.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.1% | 4.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.5% | 6.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.0% | 7.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.0% | 5.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.9% | 3.0% |
| Q4 25 | 2.1% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.7% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.4% | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.4% | 0.6% |
| Q4 25 | 4.84× | 1.65× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.99× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.60× | 1.47× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.22× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.61× | 1.35× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.13× | 1.70× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.27× | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.19× | 1.62× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LEG
| Bedding Products | $373.8M | 40% |
| Flooring And Textile Products Group | $196.9M | 21% |
| Automotive Group | $194.9M | 21% |
| Work Furniture Group | $66.2M | 7% |
| Home Furniture Group | $61.0M | 6% |
| Hydraulic Cylinders | $45.8M | 5% |
SAIC
| Prime Contractor | $1.3B | 71% |
| Civilian | $427.0M | 23% |
| Subcontractor | $116.0M | 6% |
| Commercial State And Local Agencies | $7.0M | 0% |
