vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Leslie's, Inc. (LESL) and Microvast Holdings, Inc. (MVST). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Leslie's, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($147.1M vs $96.4M, roughly 1.5× Microvast Holdings, Inc.). Microvast Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 17.2% vs -56.4%, a 73.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Microvast Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-15.0% vs -16.0%). Microvast Holdings, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($15.8M vs $-85.5M). Over the past eight quarters, Microvast Holdings, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (8.9% CAGR vs -11.7%).

Leslie's, Inc., operating as Leslie's Swimming Pool Supplies, is the largest retailer of swimming pool supplies and related products. The company is headquartered in Phoenix, Arizona, and has a particularly strong retail presence in Arizona, California, Florida, Georgia and Texas.

Microvast Holdings, Inc. is a battery technology company headquartered in Stafford, Texas, and publicly traded on the NASDAQ Stock Exchange. It designs, develops and manufactures battery components and systems primarily for electric commercial vehicles and utility-scale energy storage systems (ESS). Microvast has manufacturing facilities in the United States, China, and Germany.

LESL vs MVST — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
LESL
LESL
1.5× larger
LESL
$147.1M
$96.4M
MVST
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
MVST
MVST
+1.1% gap
MVST
-15.0%
-16.0%
LESL
Higher net margin
MVST
MVST
73.6% more per $
MVST
17.2%
-56.4%
LESL
More free cash flow
MVST
MVST
$101.2M more FCF
MVST
$15.8M
$-85.5M
LESL
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
MVST
MVST
Annualised
MVST
8.9%
-11.7%
LESL

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
LESL
LESL
MVST
MVST
Revenue
$147.1M
$96.4M
Net Profit
$-83.0M
$16.5M
Gross Margin
18.4%
1.0%
Operating Margin
-46.7%
-42.7%
Net Margin
-56.4%
17.2%
Revenue YoY
-16.0%
-15.0%
Net Profit YoY
-86.2%
120.1%
EPS (diluted)
$-8.92
$0.19

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
LESL
LESL
MVST
MVST
Q1 26
$147.1M
Q4 25
$389.2M
$96.4M
Q3 25
$123.3M
Q2 25
$500.3M
$91.3M
Q1 25
$177.1M
$116.5M
Q4 24
$175.2M
$113.4M
Q3 24
$397.9M
$101.4M
Q2 24
$569.6M
$83.7M
Net Profit
LESL
LESL
MVST
MVST
Q1 26
$-83.0M
Q4 25
$-162.8M
$16.5M
Q3 25
$-1.5M
Q2 25
$21.7M
$-106.1M
Q1 25
$-51.3M
$61.8M
Q4 24
$-44.6M
$-82.3M
Q3 24
$-9.9M
$13.2M
Q2 24
$60.6M
$-101.6M
Gross Margin
LESL
LESL
MVST
MVST
Q1 26
18.4%
Q4 25
38.6%
1.0%
Q3 25
37.6%
Q2 25
39.6%
34.7%
Q1 25
24.8%
36.9%
Q4 24
27.2%
36.6%
Q3 24
36.0%
33.2%
Q2 24
40.2%
32.5%
Operating Margin
LESL
LESL
MVST
MVST
Q1 26
-46.7%
Q4 25
-38.6%
-42.7%
Q3 25
10.5%
Q2 25
13.7%
17.8%
Q1 25
-27.3%
16.3%
Q4 24
-22.7%
-1.2%
Q3 24
6.6%
7.1%
Q2 24
17.2%
-118.0%
Net Margin
LESL
LESL
MVST
MVST
Q1 26
-56.4%
Q4 25
-41.8%
17.2%
Q3 25
-1.2%
Q2 25
4.3%
-116.1%
Q1 25
-29.0%
53.0%
Q4 24
-25.4%
-72.6%
Q3 24
-2.5%
13.1%
Q2 24
10.6%
-121.4%
EPS (diluted)
LESL
LESL
MVST
MVST
Q1 26
$-8.92
Q4 25
$-20.59
$0.19
Q3 25
$0.00
Q2 25
$0.12
$-0.33
Q1 25
$-0.28
$0.05
Q4 24
$-4.82
$-0.24
Q3 24
$-2.46
$0.03
Q2 24
$0.33
$-0.32

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
LESL
LESL
MVST
MVST
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$3.6M
$105.0M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$781.6M
$13.2M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$-489.9M
$410.5M
Total Assets
$649.4M
$1.0B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.03×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
LESL
LESL
MVST
MVST
Q1 26
$3.6M
Q4 25
$64.3M
$105.0M
Q3 25
$90.7M
Q2 25
$42.7M
$99.7M
Q1 25
$17.3M
$90.9M
Q4 24
$11.6M
$73.0M
Q3 24
$108.5M
$63.6M
Q2 24
$74.4M
$68.2M
Total Debt
LESL
LESL
MVST
MVST
Q1 26
$781.6M
Q4 25
$756.6M
$13.2M
Q3 25
$34.4M
Q2 25
$776.6M
$34.2M
Q1 25
$858.1M
$41.3M
Q4 24
$796.6M
$41.1M
Q3 24
$783.7M
$53.4M
Q2 24
$783.7M
$34.2M
Stockholders' Equity
LESL
LESL
MVST
MVST
Q1 26
$-489.9M
Q4 25
$-408.0M
$410.5M
Q3 25
$358.1M
Q2 25
$-246.2M
$356.1M
Q1 25
$-269.5M
$454.2M
Q4 24
$-220.0M
$387.9M
Q3 24
$-177.1M
$486.1M
Q2 24
$-168.2M
$455.0M
Total Assets
LESL
LESL
MVST
MVST
Q1 26
$649.4M
Q4 25
$741.5M
$1.0B
Q3 25
$1.0B
Q2 25
$989.5M
$1.0B
Q1 25
$1.0B
$982.9M
Q4 24
$967.0M
$951.9M
Q3 24
$1.1B
$997.9M
Q2 24
$1.1B
$961.4M
Debt / Equity
LESL
LESL
MVST
MVST
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.03×
Q3 25
0.10×
Q2 25
0.10×
Q1 25
0.09×
Q4 24
0.11×
Q3 24
0.11×
Q2 24
0.08×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
LESL
LESL
MVST
MVST
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$-81.1M
$16.4M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$-85.5M
$15.8M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
-58.1%
16.4%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
2.9%
0.7%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
0.99×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$7.6M
$56.1M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
LESL
LESL
MVST
MVST
Q1 26
$-81.1M
Q4 25
$48.2M
$16.4M
Q3 25
$15.2M
Q2 25
$114.9M
$37.2M
Q1 25
$-49.2M
$7.2M
Q4 24
$-105.1M
$6.1M
Q3 24
$47.1M
$-5.4M
Q2 24
$175.5M
$111.0K
Free Cash Flow
LESL
LESL
MVST
MVST
Q1 26
$-85.5M
Q4 25
$41.8M
$15.8M
Q3 25
$1.2M
Q2 25
$107.1M
$34.3M
Q1 25
$-55.8M
$4.8M
Q4 24
$-109.8M
$5.7M
Q3 24
$34.1M
$-19.6M
Q2 24
$165.2M
$-2.8M
FCF Margin
LESL
LESL
MVST
MVST
Q1 26
-58.1%
Q4 25
10.7%
16.4%
Q3 25
1.0%
Q2 25
21.4%
37.5%
Q1 25
-31.5%
4.1%
Q4 24
-62.6%
5.1%
Q3 24
8.6%
-19.3%
Q2 24
29.0%
-3.4%
Capex Intensity
LESL
LESL
MVST
MVST
Q1 26
2.9%
Q4 25
1.7%
0.7%
Q3 25
11.3%
Q2 25
1.6%
3.1%
Q1 25
3.7%
2.0%
Q4 24
2.7%
0.3%
Q3 24
3.2%
14.0%
Q2 24
1.8%
3.5%
Cash Conversion
LESL
LESL
MVST
MVST
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.99×
Q3 25
Q2 25
5.29×
Q1 25
0.12×
Q4 24
Q3 24
-0.41×
Q2 24
2.89×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

LESL
LESL

Segment breakdown not available.

MVST
MVST

Europe$35.1M36%
CN$32.5M34%
US$21.5M22%
Other$7.2M8%

Related Comparisons