vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Leslie's, Inc. (LESL) and NaaS Technology Inc. (NAAS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Leslie's, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($147.1M vs $1.3M, roughly 114.7× NaaS Technology Inc.). On growth, Leslie's, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-16.0% vs -95.0%).
Leslie's, Inc., operating as Leslie's Swimming Pool Supplies, is the largest retailer of swimming pool supplies and related products. The company is headquartered in Phoenix, Arizona, and has a particularly strong retail presence in Arizona, California, Florida, Georgia and Texas.
NaaS Technology Inc. is a leading electric vehicle energy service provider based in China. It delivers one-stop solutions covering charging network operation, software and hardware support for charging station operators, and value-added services such as charging location search and payment for EV owners, serving both enterprise and individual customers across domestic and select overseas markets.
LESL vs NAAS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 2026 vs Q2 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $147.1M | $1.3M |
| Net Profit | $-83.0M | — |
| Gross Margin | 18.4% | 96.7% |
| Operating Margin | -46.7% | -58.7% |
| Net Margin | -56.4% | — |
| Revenue YoY | -16.0% | -95.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -86.2% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-8.92 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $147.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $389.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $500.3M | $1.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $177.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $175.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $397.9M | $874.1K | ||
| Q2 24 | $569.6M | $25.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $188.7M | $1.8M |
| Q1 26 | $-83.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-162.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-51.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-44.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.9M | $-163.4K | ||
| Q2 24 | $60.6M | $-50.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-34.6M | $-4.4M |
| Q1 26 | 18.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 38.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 39.6% | 96.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 27.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 36.0% | 56.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 40.2% | 29.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 28.8% | 25.3% |
| Q1 26 | -46.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -38.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.7% | -58.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -27.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -22.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.6% | -112.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.2% | -144.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -16.2% | -193.9% |
| Q1 26 | -56.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -41.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -29.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -25.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.5% | -18.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.6% | -193.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -18.3% | -236.7% |
| Q1 26 | $-8.92 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-20.59 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.12 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.28 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.82 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.46 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.33 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.19 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $3.6M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $781.6M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-489.9M | — |
| Total Assets | $649.4M | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $3.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $64.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $42.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $108.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $74.4M | $24.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.4M | — |
| Q1 26 | $781.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $756.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $776.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $858.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $796.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $783.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $783.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $882.7M | — |
| Q1 26 | $-489.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-408.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-246.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-269.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-220.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-177.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-168.2M | $-33.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-231.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | $649.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $741.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $989.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $967.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $180.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-81.1M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-85.5M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -58.1% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.9% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $7.6M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $-81.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $48.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $114.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-49.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-105.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $175.5M | $-25.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-43.2M | — |
| Q1 26 | $-85.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $41.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $107.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-55.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-109.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $34.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $165.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-56.5M | — |
| Q1 26 | -58.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -31.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -62.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 29.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -29.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | 2.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.0% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.29× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.89× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
