vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of LIFECORE BIOMEDICAL, INC. \DE\ (LFCR) and Rumble Inc. (RUM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
LIFECORE BIOMEDICAL, INC. \DE\ is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($31.1M vs $27.1M, roughly 1.1× Rumble Inc.). LIFECORE BIOMEDICAL, INC. \DE\ runs the higher net margin — -32.1% vs -120.8%, a 88.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, LIFECORE BIOMEDICAL, INC. \DE\ posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-4.5% vs -10.5%). LIFECORE BIOMEDICAL, INC. \DE\ produced more free cash flow last quarter ($25.0K vs $-31.7M). Over the past eight quarters, Rumble Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (15.2% CAGR vs -0.1%).
LIFECORE BIOMEDICAL, INC. is a biomedical firm focused on developing and manufacturing high-quality hyaluronic acid-based biomaterials. It operates three core segments: medical application products, pharmaceutical solutions, and personal care ingredients, with main markets spanning North America, Europe and the Asia-Pacific, supplying to leading medical device, pharmaceutical and cosmetic brand partners.
Rumble is a Canadian-American online video platform, web hosting, and cloud services business headquartered in Toronto, Canada, with its U.S. headquarters in Longboat Key, Florida. It was founded in 2013 by Chris Pavlovski, a Canadian technology entrepreneur. Rumble's cloud services business hosts Truth Social, and the video platform is popular among American conservative and far-right users. Rumble has been described as "alt-tech".
LFCR vs RUM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $31.1M | $27.1M |
| Net Profit | $-10.0M | $-32.7M |
| Gross Margin | 25.0% | 5.5% |
| Operating Margin | -9.9% | -131.1% |
| Net Margin | -32.1% | -120.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -4.5% | -10.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -52.0% | 86.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.29 | $-0.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $27.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $31.1M | $24.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $35.2M | $23.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.6M | $30.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $24.7M | $25.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $22.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $35.7M | $17.7M | ||
| Q4 23 | $30.1M | $20.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-32.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-10.0M | $-16.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-14.8M | $-2.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-6.6M | $-236.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-16.2M | $-31.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-26.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $15.6M | $-43.3M | ||
| Q4 23 | $14.2M | $-29.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.0% | -1.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.0% | -26.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 34.0% | -14.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.8% | -45.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -58.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 33.3% | -79.5% | ||
| Q4 23 | 33.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -131.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -9.9% | -113.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -25.7% | -153.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -6.0% | -80.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -46.9% | -131.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -172.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.5% | -197.4% | ||
| Q4 23 | -4.9% | -182.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | -120.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -32.1% | -65.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -42.0% | -11.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -20.2% | -783.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -65.7% | -125.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -119.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 43.8% | -244.1% | ||
| Q4 23 | 47.2% | -143.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.13 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.29 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.47 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.25 | $-1.17 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.53 | $-0.15 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.13 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.42 | $-0.21 | ||
| Q4 23 | $0.39 | $-0.15 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $18.9M | $237.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $136.0M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-10.5M | $274.8M |
| Total Assets | $235.2M | $336.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $237.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.9M | $269.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.4M | $301.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.5M | $114.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $132.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $154.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $183.8M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $219.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $136.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $124.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $111.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $106.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $97.1M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $92.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $274.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-10.5M | $302.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.2M | $339.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.4M | $-63.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.9M | $166.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $192.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.7M | $210.7M | ||
| Q4 23 | $1.4M | $251.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $336.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $235.2M | $367.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $237.7M | $391.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $255.4M | $195.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $246.8M | $217.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $243.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $246.2M | $263.0M | ||
| Q4 23 | $245.8M | $295.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 56.05× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.20× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.49× | — | ||
| Q4 23 | 65.35× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.8M | $-29.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $25.0K | $-31.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 0.1% | -117.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.6% | 8.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-16.8M | $-70.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-29.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8M | $-10.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2M | $-14.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-6.1M | $-12.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-613.0K | $-19.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-21.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.4M | $-33.9M | ||
| Q4 23 | $1.3M | $-33.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-31.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.0K | $-12.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.3M | $-14.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-8.6M | $-12.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.0M | $-19.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-23.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-7.8M | $-34.3M | ||
| Q4 23 | $-3.0M | $-36.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | -117.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.1% | -48.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -12.1% | -61.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -26.3% | -40.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -16.3% | -79.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -102.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -21.8% | -193.3% | ||
| Q4 23 | -9.9% | -179.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 8.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.6% | 5.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.5% | 0.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.5% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.9% | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 17.8% | 2.4% | ||
| Q4 23 | 14.1% | 17.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.09× | — | ||
| Q4 23 | 0.09× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LFCR
| Transferred At Point In Time | $26.6M | 85% |
| Transferred Over Time | $4.5M | 15% |
RUM
| Audience Monetization | $23.8M | 88% |
| Other Initiatives | $3.3M | 12% |
