vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Lument Finance Trust, Inc. (LFT) and Spectral AI, Inc. (MDAI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Lument Finance Trust, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($5.4M vs $4.1M, roughly 1.3× Spectral AI, Inc.). Spectral AI, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 25.7% vs -144.5%, a 170.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Lument Finance Trust, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-42.6% vs -46.3%). Over the past eight quarters, Spectral AI, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-19.6% CAGR vs -35.7%).
Lument Finance Trust, Inc. is a US-based real estate finance firm that primarily invests in, manages, and operates credit assets tied to multifamily residential and commercial real estate. Its core offerings include bridge loans, permanent financing solutions, and structured real estate debt products for property owners and operators across the United States.
Spectral AI, Inc. is a medical technology firm specializing in AI-powered diagnostic imaging solutions primarily for burn and wound care. It develops non-invasive imaging tools that enable healthcare providers to deliver faster, more accurate treatment assessments, serving clinical and healthcare partner networks across North America and European markets.
LFT vs MDAI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $5.4M | $4.1M |
| Net Profit | $-7.8M | $1.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 45.2% |
| Operating Margin | — | -54.9% |
| Net Margin | -144.5% | 25.7% |
| Revenue YoY | -42.6% | -46.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -262.0% | 113.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.17 | $0.04 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $5.4M | $4.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.1M | $3.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.0M | $5.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.7M | $6.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.4M | $7.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.5M | $8.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.5M | $7.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $13.0M | $6.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-7.8M | $1.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7M | $-8.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-522.6K | $2.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.8M | $-7.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.3M | $-1.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.6M | $-2.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.0M | $-3.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 45.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 42.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 45.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 47.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 44.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 44.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 44.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 46.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | -54.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -88.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -41.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -13.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -14.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -10.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -32.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -33.9% |
| Q4 25 | -144.5% | 25.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.5% | -93.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 53.0% | -157.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.8% | 43.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 51.2% | -99.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 66.2% | -18.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 48.3% | -38.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 53.7% | -50.7% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.17 | $0.04 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.01 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.05 | $-0.31 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.03 | $0.11 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.06 | $-0.42 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.10 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.07 | $-0.16 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.11 | $-0.19 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $23.1M | $15.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $9.3M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $219.0M | $-5.7M |
| Total Assets | $1.2B | $21.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $23.1M | $15.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $56.0M | $10.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $59.4M | $10.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $63.5M | $14.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $69.2M | $5.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $45.6M | $3.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $65.1M | $6.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $64.6M | $10.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $9.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $7.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $219.0M | $-5.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $230.0M | $-8.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $231.4M | $-9.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $231.9M | $-1.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $237.8M | $-7.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $243.0M | $-4.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $242.1M | $-4.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $242.8M | $-2.5M |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $21.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $955.7M | $15.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $998.4M | $16.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $20.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $12.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $11.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $13.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $15.5M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $10.1M | $-2.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -2.43× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $10.1M | $-2.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6M | $-3.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.1M | $-1.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $27.1M | $469.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.2M | $-1.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.5M | $-5.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.1M | $-2.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | -2.43× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.62× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.98× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -0.52× | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.66× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.99× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.19× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.30× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
