vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Lifevantage Corp (LFVN) and MARINE PRODUCTS CORP (MPX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MARINE PRODUCTS CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($64.6M vs $48.9M, roughly 1.3× Lifevantage Corp). MARINE PRODUCTS CORP runs the higher net margin — 3.7% vs 0.6%, a 3.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, MARINE PRODUCTS CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (35.0% vs -27.8%). MARINE PRODUCTS CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($4.1M vs $1.7M). Over the past eight quarters, Lifevantage Corp's revenue compounded faster (0.7% CAGR vs -3.5%).
Lifevantage Corp is a health and wellness enterprise that develops, manufactures and distributes science-backed nutritional supplements, skincare and personal care products. It operates via a direct-to-consumer network marketing model, serving customers across North America, Europe and the Asia-Pacific, with focus on anti-aging and holistic health solution segments.
West Marine is an American company based in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, which operates a chain of boating supply and fishing retail stores. The company has 247 retail stores in North America. West Marine also runs Blue Future a non profit organization. West Marine's flagship store is in Fort Lauderdale. Opened on November 11, 2011, the store is the company's largest at over 50,000 square feet.
LFVN vs MPX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $48.9M | $64.6M |
| Net Profit | $276.0K | $2.4M |
| Gross Margin | 74.0% | 19.6% |
| Operating Margin | 1.0% | 5.8% |
| Net Margin | 0.6% | 3.7% |
| Revenue YoY | -27.8% | 35.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -89.2% | -44.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.02 | $0.07 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $48.9M | $64.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $47.6M | $53.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $55.1M | $67.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $58.4M | $59.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $67.8M | $47.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.2M | $49.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.9M | $69.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $48.2M | $69.3M |
| Q4 25 | $276.0K | $2.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2M | $2.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0M | $4.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5M | $2.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5M | $4.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8M | $3.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3M | $5.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7M | $4.6M |
| Q4 25 | 74.0% | 19.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 79.5% | 19.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 79.9% | 19.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 81.0% | 18.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 80.5% | 19.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 79.9% | 18.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 79.5% | 18.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 78.9% | 20.2% |
| Q4 25 | 1.0% | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.8% | 5.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.9% | 7.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.9% | 4.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.1% | 7.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.4% | 7.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.9% | 8.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.0% | 7.6% |
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | 3.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.5% | 5.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.6% | 6.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.9% | 3.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.8% | 8.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.9% | 6.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.7% | 8.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.4% | 6.6% |
| Q4 25 | $0.02 | $0.07 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.17 | $0.07 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.16 | $0.12 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.26 | $0.06 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.19 | $0.13 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.14 | $0.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.10 | $0.14 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.13 | $0.13 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $33.0M | $125.0M |
| Total Assets | $61.2M | $147.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $33.0M | $125.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $33.2M | $126.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $34.6M | $127.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $34.0M | $126.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.9M | $129.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $27.7M | $128.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.0M | $129.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $26.8M | $151.4M |
| Q4 25 | $61.2M | $147.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $61.6M | $179.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $72.0M | $173.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $77.2M | $182.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $68.5M | $171.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.5M | $176.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $60.3M | $175.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $61.3M | $204.0M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.8M | $4.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $1.7M | $4.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 3.5% | 6.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.2% | 0.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 10.11× | 2.00× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.7M | $14.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.8M | $4.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.3M | $2.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0M | $-1.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.2M | $10.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.2M | $4.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-583.0K | $5.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.6M | $3.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.1M | $15.9M |
| Q4 25 | $1.7M | $4.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.7M | $2.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $835.0K | $-2.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9M | $10.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.7M | $3.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-932.0K | $3.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3M | $3.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.8M | $15.0M |
| Q4 25 | 3.5% | 6.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -5.8% | 4.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.5% | -3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.2% | 18.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.8% | 7.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.0% | 6.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | 4.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.8% | 21.7% |
| Q4 25 | 2.2% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.9% | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.4% | 0.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.6% | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.7% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.7% | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.6% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.6% | 1.3% |
| Q4 25 | 10.11× | 2.00× | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.07× | 0.97× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.53× | -0.39× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.64× | 4.88× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.61× | 1.09× | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.32× | 1.51× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.98× | 0.68× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.86× | 3.46× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LFVN
Segment breakdown not available.
MPX
| Boats And Accessories | $63.4M | 98% |
| Parts | $1.1M | 2% |