vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Lifevantage Corp (LFVN) and Nano Dimension Ltd. (NNDM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Nano Dimension Ltd. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($57.8M vs $48.9M, roughly 1.2× Lifevantage Corp). Lifevantage Corp runs the higher net margin — 0.6% vs -171.1%, a 171.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. Lifevantage Corp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($1.7M vs $-21.1M).
Lifevantage Corp is a health and wellness enterprise that develops, manufactures and distributes science-backed nutritional supplements, skincare and personal care products. It operates via a direct-to-consumer network marketing model, serving customers across North America, Europe and the Asia-Pacific, with focus on anti-aging and holistic health solution segments.
Nano Dimension Ltd. is a leading provider of additively manufactured electronics solutions and 3D printing technologies. It designs high-precision 3D printers, related materials, and software for producing printed circuit boards, microelectronics components, and multi-layer electronic devices, serving aerospace, defense, medical, automotive, and industrial electronics segments across global markets.
LFVN vs NNDM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2024
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $48.9M | $57.8M |
| Net Profit | $276.0K | $-98.8M |
| Gross Margin | 74.0% | 43.1% |
| Operating Margin | 1.0% | -155.1% |
| Net Margin | 0.6% | -171.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -27.8% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -89.2% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.02 | $-0.45 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $48.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $47.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $55.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $58.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $67.8M | $57.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.9M | $28.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $48.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $276.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5M | $-98.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3M | $-79.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | 74.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 79.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 79.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 81.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 80.5% | 43.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 79.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 79.5% | 45.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 78.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.1% | -155.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.8% | -171.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.7% | -279.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.02 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.17 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.16 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.26 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.19 | $-0.45 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.14 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.10 | $-0.35 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.13 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $317.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $33.0M | $860.0M |
| Total Assets | $61.2M | $902.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $317.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.9M | $231.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $33.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $33.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $34.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $34.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.9M | $860.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $27.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.0M | $870.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $26.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $61.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $61.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $72.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $77.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $68.5M | $902.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $60.3M | $911.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $61.3M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.8M | $-18.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $1.7M | $-21.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 3.5% | -36.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.2% | 3.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 10.11× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.7M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.2M | $-18.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-583.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.6M | $-30.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $835.0K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.7M | $-21.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-932.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | 3.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -5.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.8% | -36.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.7% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 10.11× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.07× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.53× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.64× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.61× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.32× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.98× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.86× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
