vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Lifevantage Corp (LFVN) and TELOS CORP (TLS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Lifevantage Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($48.9M vs $46.8M, roughly 1.0× TELOS CORP). Lifevantage Corp runs the higher net margin — 0.6% vs -34.9%, a 35.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, TELOS CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (77.4% vs -27.8%). TELOS CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($8.0M vs $1.7M). Over the past eight quarters, TELOS CORP's revenue compounded faster (25.7% CAGR vs 0.7%).
Lifevantage Corp is a health and wellness enterprise that develops, manufactures and distributes science-backed nutritional supplements, skincare and personal care products. It operates via a direct-to-consumer network marketing model, serving customers across North America, Europe and the Asia-Pacific, with focus on anti-aging and holistic health solution segments.
Telos Corporation is an information technology and cybersecurity company located in Ashburn, Virginia. Telos primarily serves government and enterprise clients, receiving a large number of its contracts from the United States Department of Defense. Customers are primarily military, intelligence and civilian agencies of the US government and NATO allies.
LFVN vs TLS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $48.9M | $46.8M |
| Net Profit | $276.0K | $-16.3M |
| Gross Margin | 74.0% | 35.0% |
| Operating Margin | 1.0% | -39.6% |
| Net Margin | 0.6% | -34.9% |
| Revenue YoY | -27.8% | 77.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -89.2% | -74.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.02 | $-0.22 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $48.9M | $46.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $47.6M | $51.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $55.1M | $36.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $58.4M | $30.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $67.8M | $26.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.2M | $23.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.9M | $28.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $48.2M | $29.6M |
| Q4 25 | $276.0K | $-16.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2M | $-2.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0M | $-9.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5M | $-8.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5M | $-9.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8M | $-28.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3M | $-7.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7M | $-7.4M |
| Q4 25 | 74.0% | 35.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 79.5% | 39.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 79.9% | 33.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 81.0% | 39.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 80.5% | 40.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 79.9% | 13.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 79.5% | 34.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 78.9% | 37.0% |
| Q4 25 | 1.0% | -39.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.8% | -4.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.9% | -27.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.9% | -29.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.1% | -37.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.4% | -121.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.9% | -30.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.0% | -28.5% |
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | -34.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.5% | -4.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.6% | -26.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.9% | -28.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.8% | -35.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.9% | -118.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.7% | -27.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.4% | -24.9% |
| Q4 25 | $0.02 | $-0.22 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.17 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.16 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.26 | $-0.12 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.19 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.14 | $-0.39 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.10 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.13 | $-0.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $53.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $33.0M | $96.0M |
| Total Assets | $61.2M | $139.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $53.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $59.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.2M | $57.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $57.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $54.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $69.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.9M | $80.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $93.9M |
| Q4 25 | $33.0M | $96.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $33.2M | $119.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $34.6M | $118.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $34.0M | $126.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.9M | $127.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $27.7M | $129.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.0M | $149.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $26.8M | $154.4M |
| Q4 25 | $61.2M | $139.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $61.6M | $164.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $72.0M | $165.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $77.2M | $158.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $68.5M | $158.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.5M | $166.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $60.3M | $182.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $61.3M | $195.4M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.8M | $8.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $1.7M | $8.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 3.5% | 17.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.2% | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 10.11× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.7M | $29.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.8M | $8.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.3M | $9.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0M | $7.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.2M | $6.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.2M | $-10.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-583.0K | $-7.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.6M | $-8.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.1M | $-350.0K |
| Q4 25 | $1.7M | $8.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.7M | $8.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $835.0K | $6.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9M | $6.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.7M | $-12.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-932.0K | $-7.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3M | $-8.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.8M | $-447.0K |
| Q4 25 | 3.5% | 17.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -5.8% | 16.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.5% | 19.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.2% | 19.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.8% | -47.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.0% | -30.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | -28.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.8% | -1.5% |
| Q4 25 | 2.2% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.9% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.4% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.6% | 0.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.7% | 7.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.7% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.6% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.6% | 0.3% |
| Q4 25 | 10.11× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.07× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.53× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.64× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.61× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.32× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.98× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.86× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LFVN
Segment breakdown not available.
TLS
| Security Solutions Segment | $44.8M | 96% |
| Secure Networks Segment | $1.9M | 4% |
