vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Lion Group Holding Ltd (LGHL) and NaaS Technology Inc. (NAAS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
NaaS Technology Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($25.9M vs $13.3M, roughly 1.9× Lion Group Holding Ltd). Lion Group Holding Ltd runs the higher net margin — -0.4% vs -193.3%, a 192.8% gap on every dollar of revenue.
LION is a Canadian electric vehicle manufacturer headquartered in Saint-Jérôme, Quebec. Founded in 2011 as Lion Bus, the company is primarily known for its production of yellow school buses, of which it was the first to mass produce as a fully electric vehicle.
NaaS Technology Inc. is a leading electric vehicle energy service provider based in China. It delivers one-stop solutions covering charging network operation, software and hardware support for charging station operators, and value-added services such as charging location search and payment for EV owners, serving both enterprise and individual customers across domestic and select overseas markets.
LGHL vs NAAS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2024 vs Q2 FY2024
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $13.3M | $25.9M |
| Net Profit | $-53.7K | $-50.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 29.2% |
| Operating Margin | — | -144.2% |
| Net Margin | -0.4% | -193.3% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 121.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 18.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q2 24 | $13.3M | $25.9M | ||
| Q2 22 | $3.6M | — |
| Q2 24 | $-53.7K | $-50.0M | ||
| Q2 22 | $-20.3M | — |
| Q2 24 | — | 29.2% | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q2 24 | — | -144.2% | ||
| Q2 22 | -624.5% | — |
| Q2 24 | -0.4% | -193.3% | ||
| Q2 22 | -565.4% | — |
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.02 | ||
| Q2 22 | $-0.52 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $29.0M | $24.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $28.4M | $-33.4M |
| Total Assets | $74.5M | $180.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 24 | $29.0M | $24.7M | ||
| Q2 22 | $11.9M | — |
| Q2 24 | $28.4M | $-33.4M | ||
| Q2 22 | $36.5M | — |
| Q2 24 | $74.5M | $180.2M | ||
| Q2 22 | $103.2M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-25.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 24 | — | $-25.7M | ||
| Q2 22 | $-904.8K | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LGHL
| Trading gains | $7.8M | 59% |
| Other | $2.4M | 18% |
| Securities brokerage commissions and fees | $1.7M | 13% |
| Market making commissions and fees | $1.0M | 8% |
| Other income | $380.2K | 3% |
NAAS
Segment breakdown not available.
