vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Lion Group Holding Ltd (LGHL) and SCYNEXIS INC (SCYX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SCYNEXIS INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($18.6M vs $13.3M, roughly 1.4× Lion Group Holding Ltd). SCYNEXIS INC runs the higher net margin — 65.7% vs -0.4%, a 66.1% gap on every dollar of revenue.
LION is a Canadian electric vehicle manufacturer headquartered in Saint-Jérôme, Quebec. Founded in 2011 as Lion Bus, the company is primarily known for its production of yellow school buses, of which it was the first to mass produce as a fully electric vehicle.
SCYNEXIS Inc. is a biotechnology company focused on developing innovative antifungal therapies to address unmet medical needs for difficult-to-treat fungal infections. It targets hospital and specialty care markets, with key product candidates serving immunocompromised patients and other high-risk groups.
LGHL vs SCYX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2024 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $13.3M | $18.6M |
| Net Profit | $-53.7K | $12.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | 56.3% |
| Net Margin | -0.4% | 65.7% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 1808.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 376.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.25 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $18.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $334.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $257.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $977.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $660.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.3M | $736.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $12.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-8.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-6.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-5.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-2.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-53.7K | $-14.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $411.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | 56.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -2516.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -701.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -3350.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -1563.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -1255.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -692.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 65.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -2572.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -504.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -2097.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -425.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.4% | -1964.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 29.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.25 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.17 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.14 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.11 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.30 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.01 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $29.0M | $40.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $28.4M | $49.4M |
| Total Assets | $74.5M | $59.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $40.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $37.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $44.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $40.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $59.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $68.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $29.0M | $73.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $80.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $49.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $36.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $44.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $50.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $55.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $58.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.4M | $60.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $74.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $59.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $51.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $60.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $67.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $90.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $99.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $74.5M | $107.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $118.3M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $18.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.50× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $18.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-8.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-7.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-7.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-24.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $765.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-10.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-4.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.50× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -9.75× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LGHL
| Trading gains | $7.8M | 59% |
| Other | $2.4M | 18% |
| Securities brokerage commissions and fees | $1.7M | 13% |
| Market making commissions and fees | $1.0M | 8% |
| Other income | $380.2K | 3% |
SCYX
| Glaxosmithkline Intellectual Property | $17.2M | 92% |
| Products | $1.4M | 8% |
