vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Legence Corp. (LGN) and WEIBO Corp (WB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
WEIBO Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.3B vs $708.0M, roughly 1.8× Legence Corp.). WEIBO Corp runs the higher net margin — 35.7% vs -0.1%, a 35.8% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Legence Corp is a leading sustainable building and decarbonization solution provider. It delivers energy efficiency optimization, building automation design, renewable energy integration, and low-carbon retrofit services for commercial, industrial, and institutional clients, with core operations across North America to help customers cut costs and reduce carbon footprints.
Weibo Corporation is a Chinese social network company known for the microblogging website Sina Weibo. It is based in Beijing, China.
LGN vs WB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $708.0M | $1.3B |
| Net Profit | $-576.0K | $458.3M |
| Gross Margin | 20.9% | — |
| Operating Margin | 5.3% | 29.1% |
| Net Margin | -0.1% | 35.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 26.2% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 46.8% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.02 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | $708.0M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $841.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $396.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $560.8M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $833.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $395.5M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $854.0M |
| Q3 25 | $-576.0K | $458.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $234.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $108.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.1M | $297.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $164.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $51.1M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $268.8M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $188.6M |
| Q3 25 | 20.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | 5.3% | 29.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 30.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 27.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.8% | 29.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 28.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 25.2% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | 27.3% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | 25.8% |
| Q3 25 | -0.1% | 35.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 27.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 27.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.2% | 22.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 19.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 12.9% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | 20.7% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | 22.1% |
| Q3 25 | $-0.02 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $176.0M | $1.1B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $812.6M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $387.9M | $3.9B |
| Total Assets | $2.6B | $6.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.10× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $176.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $2.4B |
| Q3 25 | $812.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | $387.9M | $3.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $3.1B |
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | $6.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $6.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $6.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $7.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $7.3B | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $6.7B | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $6.9B |
| Q3 25 | 2.10× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $162.1M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $137.4M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 19.4% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.5% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $162.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | $137.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | 19.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | 3.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LGN
| Installation And Fabrication | $408.7M | 58% |
| Engineering And Design | $110.9M | 16% |
| Program And Project Management | $101.2M | 14% |
| Maintenance And Service | $87.1M | 12% |
WB
| Income from operations | $373.2M | 29% |
| Shares used in computing diluted net income per share attributable to Weibos shareholders | $268.1M | 21% |
| Shares used in computing basic net income per share attributable to Weibos shareholders | $238.6M | 19% |
| Value-added services | $186.1M | 14% |
| Less: Income tax expenses | $113.2M | 9% |
| Investment related income, net | $45.0M | 4% |
| Product development | $16.7M | 1% |
| General and administrative | $10.6M | 1% |
| Sales and marketing | $7.1M | 1% |
| Accretion to redeemable non-controlling interests | $3.0M | 0% |
