vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of L3Harris (LHX) and LESAKA TECHNOLOGIES INC (LSAK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
L3Harris is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($5.7B vs $3.0B, roughly 1.9× LESAKA TECHNOLOGIES INC). L3Harris runs the higher net margin — 8.9% vs 0.0%, a 8.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, L3Harris posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (24.0% vs 0.2%). Over the past eight quarters, LESAKA TECHNOLOGIES INC's revenue compounded faster (352.8% CAGR vs 5.0%).
L3Harris Technologies, Inc. is an American technology company, defense contractor, and information technology services provider that produces products for command and control systems, wireless equipment, tactical radios, avionics and electronic systems, night vision equipment, intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance (C3ISR) systems and products, ocean systems, instrumentation, navigation products, training devices and services, and both terrestrial/spaceborne antennas for use in the govern...
Lesaka Technologies is a South-African financial technology company that is listed on the NASDAQ and Johannesburg Stock Exchange. Lesaka’s primary focus is on financial inclusion, offering financial services to previously underserved communities and merchants.
LHX vs LSAK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2027 vs Q1 FY2027
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $5.7B | $3.0B |
| Net Profit | $512.0M | $437.0K |
| Gross Margin | 175.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | 11.4% | 2.2% |
| Net Margin | 8.9% | 0.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 24.0% | 0.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 32.6% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.72 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 26 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q1 26 | $21.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.7B | $178.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $171.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.4B | $168.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.5B | $161.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $176.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.3B | $153.6M |
| Q3 26 | — | $437.0K | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $462.0M | $3.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-4.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $458.0M | $-28.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $453.0M | $-22.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-32.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $400.0M | $-4.5M |
| Q3 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | 25.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 26.4% | 31.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 30.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 24.6% | 28.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 25.3% | 27.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 25.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.8% | 22.6% |
| Q3 26 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 26 | 9.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.0% | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.5% | -16.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.3% | 0.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.4% | -0.0% |
| Q3 26 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.2% | 2.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -2.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.4% | -16.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.2% | -13.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -18.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.6% | -3.0% |
| Q3 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.46 | $0.04 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.05 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.44 | $-0.40 | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.37 | $-0.27 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.40 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.10 | $-0.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $590.0K | $1.5B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $350.0K | $3.2B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $19.7M | — |
| Total Assets | $41.4M | $11.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.02× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 26 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 26 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $339.0M | $69.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $72.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $482.0M | $76.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $615.0M | $71.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $60.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $539.0M | $49.7M |
| Q3 26 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q1 26 | $10.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $11.0B | $216.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $208.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.0B | $200.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.1B | $194.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $148.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.1B | $148.5M |
| Q3 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $19.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $19.5B | $180.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $170.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.3B | $161.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.5B | $185.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $193.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.0B | $184.2M |
| Q3 26 | — | $11.5B | ||
| Q1 26 | $41.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $41.0B | $704.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $652.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $41.2B | $653.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $42.0B | $649.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $640.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $41.9B | $551.9M |
| Q3 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | 0.53× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.56× | 1.20× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.22× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.57× | 1.24× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.57× | 1.05× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.77× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.58× | 0.81× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-95.0M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-187.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -3.3% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.7% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.19× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $546.0M | $-10.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $8.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $640.0M | $-9.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $10.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-9.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $780.0M | $-4.1M |
| Q3 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $427.0M | $-14.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $552.0M | $-13.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $7.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-15.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $702.0M | $-8.1M |
| Q3 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.5% | -8.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.2% | -7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.3% | 4.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -8.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.3% | -5.3% |
| Q3 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.1% | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.6% | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.1% | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.5% | 2.6% |
| Q3 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.18× | -2.99× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.40× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.49× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.95× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LHX
| Space & Mission Systems | $3.0B | 52% |
| Communication & Spectrum Dominance | $1.9B | 32% |
| Missile Solutions | $990.0M | 17% |
LSAK
Segment breakdown not available.
