vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of L3Harris (LHX) and Phillips 66 (PSX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Phillips 66 is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($34.1B vs $21.9B, roughly 1.6× L3Harris). On growth, L3Harris posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.5% vs 1.3%). Over the past eight quarters, L3Harris's revenue compounded faster (102.4% CAGR vs -2.4%).
L3Harris Technologies, Inc. is an American technology company, defense contractor, and information technology services provider that produces products for command and control systems, wireless equipment, tactical radios, avionics and electronic systems, night vision equipment, intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance (C3ISR) systems and products, ocean systems, instrumentation, navigation products, training devices and services, and both terrestrial/spaceborne antennas for use in the govern...
The Phillips 66 Company is an American multinational energy company headquartered in Westchase, Houston, Texas. Its name, dating back to 1927 as a trademark of the Phillips Petroleum Company, assisted in establishing the newly reconfigured Phillips 66. The company today was formed ten years after Phillips merged with Conoco to form ConocoPhillips.
LHX vs PSX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $21.9B | $34.1B |
| Net Profit | — | $2.9B |
| Gross Margin | 25.7% | 14.6% |
| Operating Margin | 9.7% | — |
| Net Margin | — | 8.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 2.5% | 1.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 36225.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $7.14 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $21.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.7B | $34.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $34.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.4B | $33.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.5B | $30.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $33.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.3B | $35.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.3B | $38.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $462.0M | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $133.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $458.0M | $877.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $453.0M | $487.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $8.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $400.0M | $346.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $366.0M | $1.0B |
| Q1 26 | 25.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 26.4% | 14.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 12.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 24.6% | 12.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 25.3% | 9.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.8% | 9.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.7% | 9.2% |
| Q1 26 | 9.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.0% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.2% | 8.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.4% | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.2% | 1.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.6% | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.9% | 2.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.46 | $7.14 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.32 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.44 | $2.15 | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.37 | $1.18 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.06 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.10 | $0.82 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.92 | $2.38 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.1B | $1.1B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $10.4B | $18.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $19.6B | $29.1B |
| Total Assets | $41.2B | $73.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.53× | 0.64× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $339.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $482.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $615.0M | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $539.0M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $547.0M | $2.4B |
| Q1 26 | $10.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $11.0B | $18.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $19.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.0B | $17.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.1B | $17.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $18.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.1B | $18.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.5B | $17.2B |
| Q1 26 | $19.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $19.5B | $29.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $26.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.3B | $27.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.5B | $27.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $27.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.0B | $28.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.8B | $29.5B |
| Q1 26 | $41.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $41.0B | $73.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $76.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $41.2B | $75.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $42.0B | $71.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $72.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $41.9B | $75.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $41.7B | $75.9B |
| Q1 26 | 0.53× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.56× | 0.64× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.71× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.57× | 0.63× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.57× | 0.65× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.67× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.58× | 0.64× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.56× | 0.58× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $2.8B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.95× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $546.0M | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $640.0M | $845.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $187.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $780.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $754.0M | $2.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $427.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $552.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $702.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $657.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.18× | 0.95× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 8.86× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.40× | 0.96× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.49× | 0.38× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 149.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.95× | 3.27× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.06× | 2.07× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LHX
| Space And Airborne Systems Segment | $6.9B | 32% |
| Integrated Mission Systems Segment | $6.6B | 30% |
| Communication Systems Segment | $5.7B | 26% |
| Aerojet Rocketdyne Segment | $2.8B | 13% |
PSX
| Marketing Speciality Segment | $21.7B | 64% |
| Crude Oil | $3.7B | 11% |
| GB | $3.5B | 10% |
| Other Geographical Areas | $2.4B | 7% |
| DE | $1.1B | 3% |
| Renewable Fuels | $876.0M | 3% |
| Other Product Line | $634.0M | 2% |
