vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Life360, Inc. (LIF) and PEGASYSTEMS INC (PEGA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PEGASYSTEMS INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($430.0M vs $146.0M, roughly 2.9× Life360, Inc.). Life360, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 88.8% vs 7.6%, a 81.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Life360, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (26.4% vs -9.6%). PEGASYSTEMS INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($206.5M vs $36.6M). Over the past eight quarters, Life360, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (36.6% CAGR vs 10.7%).
Life360, Inc. develops family-focused safety and connectivity platforms. Core offerings include real-time location sharing, emergency alerts, driving behavior analysis tools and identity theft protection. It serves consumer markets across North America, Europe and Asia-Pacific, with most revenue from tiered premium subscription plans.
Pegasystems Inc. (Pega) is a global software company based in Waltham, Massachusetts, in the United States, and founded in 1983. The company has been publicly traded since 1996 as PEGA (NASDAQ). Pega is a low-code platform for workflow automation and generative AI-powered decision-making for businesses.
LIF vs PEGA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q1 2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $146.0M | $430.0M |
| Net Profit | $129.7M | $32.8M |
| Gross Margin | 75.1% | 75.2% |
| Operating Margin | 6.1% | 8.6% |
| Net Margin | 88.8% | 7.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 26.4% | -9.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 1425.9% | -61.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.53 | $0.18 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $430.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $146.0M | $504.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $124.5M | $381.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $115.4M | $384.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $103.6M | $475.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $115.5M | $490.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $92.9M | $325.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $84.9M | $351.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $32.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $129.7M | $234.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.8M | $43.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.0M | $30.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.4M | $85.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.5M | $119.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.7M | $-14.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-11.0M | $6.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | 75.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 75.1% | 79.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 78.0% | 72.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 78.4% | 71.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 80.6% | 78.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 74.0% | 79.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 75.4% | 70.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 75.0% | 72.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | 8.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.1% | 20.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.6% | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.7% | 4.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.1% | 26.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.9% | 29.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -5.3% | -3.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.8% | 3.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 7.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 88.8% | 46.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.9% | 11.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.1% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.2% | 18.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.4% | 24.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.3% | -4.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -12.9% | 1.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.18 | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.53 | $0.81 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.11 | $0.24 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.08 | $0.17 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.05 | $0.91 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.14 | $1.35 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.09 | $-0.17 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.15 | $0.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $494.3M | $270.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $548.2M | $705.9M |
| Total Assets | $959.7M | $1.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $270.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $494.3M | $425.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $455.7M | $351.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $432.7M | $411.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $168.9M | $371.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $159.2M | $740.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $159.0M | $703.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $160.8M | $665.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $705.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $548.2M | $787.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $391.4M | $596.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $366.7M | $624.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $376.3M | $611.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $358.5M | $585.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $339.7M | $473.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $326.7M | $435.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $959.7M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $787.5M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $753.6M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $455.4M | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $441.6M | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $427.4M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $405.9M | $1.5B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $36.8M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $36.6M | $206.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 25.1% | 48.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.2% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.28× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $86.8M | $494.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $36.8M | $158.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.4M | $56.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.3M | $86.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.1M | $204.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.3M | $95.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.3M | $30.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.3M | $40.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $206.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $36.6M | $152.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.6M | $51.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.7M | $84.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.9M | $202.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.2M | $92.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.3M | $27.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2M | $38.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | 48.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 25.1% | 30.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.6% | 13.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.0% | 21.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.5% | 42.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.7% | 18.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.8% | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.8% | 11.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.2% | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.6% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.6% | 0.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | 0.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.0% | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.1% | 0.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.28× | 0.68× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.70× | 1.30× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.90× | 2.87× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.75× | 2.39× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.45× | 0.80× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.83× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.06× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LIF
Segment breakdown not available.
PEGA
| Pega Cloud | $205.0M | 48% |
| Subscription license | $94.9M | 22% |
| Maintenance | $75.3M | 18% |
| Consulting | $54.8M | 13% |
