vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Lennox International (LII) and Natera, Inc. (NTRA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Lennox International is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.2B vs $665.5M, roughly 1.8× Natera, Inc.). Lennox International runs the higher net margin — 13.6% vs 7.1%, a 6.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Natera, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (39.8% vs -11.2%). Lennox International produced more free cash flow last quarter ($376.7M vs $37.8M). Over the past eight quarters, Natera, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (34.5% CAGR vs 6.8%).
Lennox International Inc. is an American provider of climate control products for the heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) and refrigeration markets. Based in Richardson, Texas, the company is 9.8% owned by John W. Norris, III, a descendant of DW Norris, who acquired the company in 1904. The company's largest production facilities are in Saltillo, Mexico, Marshalltown, Iowa, and Orangeburg, South Carolina.
Natera, Inc. is a clinical genetic testing company based in Austin, Texas that specializes in non-invasive, cell-free DNA (cfDNA) testing technology, with a focus on women’s health, cancer, and organ health. Natera’s proprietary technology combines novel molecular biology techniques with a suite of bioinformatics software that allows detection down to a single molecule in a tube of blood. Natera operates CAP-accredited laboratories certified under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendment...
LII vs NTRA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.2B | $665.5M |
| Net Profit | $162.1M | $47.3M |
| Gross Margin | 34.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | 18.6% | -3.4% |
| Net Margin | 13.6% | 7.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -11.2% | 39.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | -18.0% | 187.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $4.62 | $0.36 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $665.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $592.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $546.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $501.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $476.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $439.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $413.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.0B | $367.7M |
| Q4 25 | $162.1M | $47.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $245.8M | $-87.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $277.6M | $-100.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $120.3M | $-66.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $197.7M | $-53.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $239.0M | $-31.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $245.9M | $-37.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $124.3M | $-67.6M |
| Q4 25 | 34.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 34.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 30.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 32.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 32.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 18.6% | -3.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.7% | -16.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.6% | -20.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.5% | -15.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.2% | -13.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.2% | -8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.1% | -10.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 15.9% | -20.2% |
| Q4 25 | 13.6% | 7.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.2% | -14.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.5% | -18.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.2% | -13.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.7% | -11.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.0% | -7.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.9% | -9.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.9% | -18.4% |
| Q4 25 | $4.62 | $0.36 | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.98 | $-0.64 | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.82 | $-0.74 | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.37 | $-0.50 | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.52 | $-0.41 | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.68 | $-0.26 | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.87 | $-0.30 | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.47 | $-0.56 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $34.7M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.1B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | $1.7B |
| Total Assets | $4.1B | $2.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.98× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $34.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $59.2M | $1.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $55.1M | $16.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $222.9M | $17.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $422.3M | $22.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $255.7M | $29.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $57.8M | $90.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $57.6M | $69.1M |
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $838.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $835.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $834.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $833.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $827.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $900.5M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $852.5M | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $850.2M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $754.0M | $878.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $577.4M | $836.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $368.8M | $794.1M |
| Q4 25 | $4.1B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.5B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.0B | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | 0.98× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.78× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.93× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.98× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.98× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.10× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.95× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.13× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $405.9M | $73.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $376.7M | $37.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 31.5% | 5.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.4% | 5.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.50× | 1.56× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $638.8M | $109.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $405.9M | $73.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $300.7M | $59.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $86.8M | $37.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-35.8M | $44.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $332.4M | $52.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $452.1M | $51.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $184.0M | $4.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-22.8M | $27.0M |
| Q4 25 | $376.7M | $37.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $265.1M | $37.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $58.3M | $11.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-61.3M | $22.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $272.2M | $34.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $410.9M | $35.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $151.3M | $-7.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-52.3M | $6.7M |
| Q4 25 | 31.5% | 5.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.6% | 6.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.9% | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.7% | 4.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.2% | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.4% | 8.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.4% | -1.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.0% | 1.8% |
| Q4 25 | 2.4% | 5.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.5% | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.9% | 4.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.4% | 4.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.5% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.8% | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.3% | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.8% | 5.5% |
| Q4 25 | 2.50× | 1.56× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.22× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.31× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.30× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.68× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.89× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.75× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.18× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LII
| Residential Heating And Cooling | $699.8M | 59% |
| Commercial Heating And Cooling | $495.2M | 41% |
NTRA
Segment breakdown not available.
