vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Lennox International (LII) and SEI INVESTMENTS CO (SEIC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Lennox International is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.2B vs $622.2M, roughly 1.9× SEI INVESTMENTS CO). SEI INVESTMENTS CO runs the higher net margin — 28.0% vs 13.6%, a 14.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SEI INVESTMENTS CO posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.0% vs -11.2%). Over the past eight quarters, SEI INVESTMENTS CO's revenue compounded faster (9.5% CAGR vs 6.8%).

Lennox International Inc. is an American provider of climate control products for the heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) and refrigeration markets. Based in Richardson, Texas, the company is 9.8% owned by John W. Norris, III, a descendant of DW Norris, who acquired the company in 1904. The company's largest production facilities are in Saltillo, Mexico, Marshalltown, Iowa, and Orangeburg, South Carolina.

SEI Investments Company, formerly Simulated Environments Inc., is a financial services company headquartered in Oaks, Pennsylvania, United States. SEI provides products and services to institutions, private banks, investment advisors, investment managers, and private clients. Through its subsidiaries and partnerships in which the company has significant interests, SEI manages, advises or administers $1 trillion in hedge funds, private equity, mutual funds and pooled or separately managed asse...

LII vs SEIC — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
LII
LII
1.9× larger
LII
$1.2B
$622.2M
SEIC
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
SEIC
SEIC
+24.2% gap
SEIC
13.0%
-11.2%
LII
Higher net margin
SEIC
SEIC
14.5% more per $
SEIC
28.0%
13.6%
LII
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
SEIC
SEIC
Annualised
SEIC
9.5%
6.8%
LII

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
LII
LII
SEIC
SEIC
Revenue
$1.2B
$622.2M
Net Profit
$162.1M
$174.5M
Gross Margin
34.7%
Operating Margin
18.6%
30.5%
Net Margin
13.6%
28.0%
Revenue YoY
-11.2%
13.0%
Net Profit YoY
-18.0%
15.0%
EPS (diluted)
$4.62
$1.40

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
LII
LII
SEIC
SEIC
Q1 26
$622.2M
Q4 25
$1.2B
$607.9M
Q3 25
$1.4B
$578.5M
Q2 25
$1.5B
$559.6M
Q1 25
$1.1B
$551.3M
Q4 24
$1.3B
$557.2M
Q3 24
$1.5B
$537.4M
Q2 24
$1.5B
$519.0M
Net Profit
LII
LII
SEIC
SEIC
Q1 26
$174.5M
Q4 25
$162.1M
$172.5M
Q3 25
$245.8M
$164.2M
Q2 25
$277.6M
$227.1M
Q1 25
$120.3M
$151.5M
Q4 24
$197.7M
$155.8M
Q3 24
$239.0M
$154.9M
Q2 24
$245.9M
$139.1M
Gross Margin
LII
LII
SEIC
SEIC
Q1 26
Q4 25
34.7%
36.8%
Q3 25
32.8%
35.0%
Q2 25
34.8%
33.8%
Q1 25
30.6%
34.9%
Q4 24
33.9%
33.1%
Q3 24
32.6%
33.8%
Q2 24
33.6%
32.7%
Operating Margin
LII
LII
SEIC
SEIC
Q1 26
30.5%
Q4 25
18.6%
26.6%
Q3 25
21.7%
27.7%
Q2 25
23.6%
26.6%
Q1 25
14.5%
28.5%
Q4 24
18.2%
26.1%
Q3 24
20.2%
26.8%
Q2 24
22.1%
26.3%
Net Margin
LII
LII
SEIC
SEIC
Q1 26
28.0%
Q4 25
13.6%
28.4%
Q3 25
17.2%
28.4%
Q2 25
18.5%
40.6%
Q1 25
11.2%
27.5%
Q4 24
14.7%
28.0%
Q3 24
16.0%
28.8%
Q2 24
16.9%
26.8%
EPS (diluted)
LII
LII
SEIC
SEIC
Q1 26
$1.40
Q4 25
$4.62
$1.38
Q3 25
$6.98
$1.30
Q2 25
$7.82
$1.78
Q1 25
$3.37
$1.17
Q4 24
$5.52
$1.18
Q3 24
$6.68
$1.19
Q2 24
$6.87
$1.05

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
LII
LII
SEIC
SEIC
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$34.7M
$363.1M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$1.1B
$32.4M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$1.2B
$2.5B
Total Assets
$4.1B
$3.3B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.98×
0.01×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
LII
LII
SEIC
SEIC
Q1 26
$363.1M
Q4 25
$34.7M
$399.8M
Q3 25
$59.2M
Q2 25
$55.1M
Q1 25
$222.9M
$710.7M
Q4 24
$422.3M
$839.9M
Q3 24
$255.7M
$901.1M
Q2 24
$57.8M
$768.3M
Total Debt
LII
LII
SEIC
SEIC
Q1 26
$32.4M
Q4 25
$1.1B
Q3 25
$838.2M
Q2 25
$835.7M
Q1 25
$834.2M
Q4 24
$833.1M
Q3 24
$827.6M
Q2 24
$1.1B
Stockholders' Equity
LII
LII
SEIC
SEIC
Q1 26
$2.5B
Q4 25
$1.2B
$2.4B
Q3 25
$1.1B
$2.4B
Q2 25
$900.5M
$2.3B
Q1 25
$852.5M
$2.3B
Q4 24
$850.2M
$2.3B
Q3 24
$754.0M
$2.4B
Q2 24
$577.4M
$2.2B
Total Assets
LII
LII
SEIC
SEIC
Q1 26
$3.3B
Q4 25
$4.1B
Q3 25
$3.5B
Q2 25
$3.7B
$2.6B
Q1 25
$3.5B
$2.6B
Q4 24
$3.5B
$2.7B
Q3 24
$3.3B
$2.7B
Q2 24
$3.2B
$2.5B
Debt / Equity
LII
LII
SEIC
SEIC
Q1 26
0.01×
Q4 25
0.98×
Q3 25
0.78×
Q2 25
0.93×
Q1 25
0.98×
Q4 24
0.98×
Q3 24
1.10×
Q2 24
1.95×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
LII
LII
SEIC
SEIC
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$405.9M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$376.7M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
31.5%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
2.4%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
2.50×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$638.8M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
LII
LII
SEIC
SEIC
Q1 26
Q4 25
$405.9M
$126.4M
Q3 25
$300.7M
$238.3M
Q2 25
$86.8M
$96.5M
Q1 25
$-35.8M
$146.5M
Q4 24
$332.4M
$195.3M
Q3 24
$452.1M
$200.0M
Q2 24
$184.0M
$114.7M
Free Cash Flow
LII
LII
SEIC
SEIC
Q1 26
Q4 25
$376.7M
$124.8M
Q3 25
$265.1M
$229.6M
Q2 25
$58.3M
$92.7M
Q1 25
$-61.3M
$137.8M
Q4 24
$272.2M
$190.2M
Q3 24
$410.9M
$193.7M
Q2 24
$151.3M
$107.0M
FCF Margin
LII
LII
SEIC
SEIC
Q1 26
Q4 25
31.5%
20.5%
Q3 25
18.6%
39.7%
Q2 25
3.9%
16.6%
Q1 25
-5.7%
25.0%
Q4 24
20.2%
34.1%
Q3 24
27.4%
36.0%
Q2 24
10.4%
20.6%
Capex Intensity
LII
LII
SEIC
SEIC
Q1 26
Q4 25
2.4%
0.3%
Q3 25
2.5%
1.5%
Q2 25
1.9%
0.7%
Q1 25
2.4%
1.6%
Q4 24
4.5%
0.9%
Q3 24
2.8%
1.2%
Q2 24
2.3%
1.5%
Cash Conversion
LII
LII
SEIC
SEIC
Q1 26
Q4 25
2.50×
0.73×
Q3 25
1.22×
1.45×
Q2 25
0.31×
0.43×
Q1 25
-0.30×
0.97×
Q4 24
1.68×
1.25×
Q3 24
1.89×
1.29×
Q2 24
0.75×
0.82×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

LII
LII

Residential Heating And Cooling$699.8M59%
Commercial Heating And Cooling$495.2M41%

SEIC
SEIC

Segment breakdown not available.

Related Comparisons