vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Lennox International (LII) and THOMSON REUTERS CORP (TRI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

THOMSON REUTERS CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.8B vs $1.2B, roughly 1.5× Lennox International). THOMSON REUTERS CORP runs the higher net margin — 17.5% vs 13.6%, a 4.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, THOMSON REUTERS CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.6% vs -11.2%).

Lennox International Inc. is an American provider of climate control products for the heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) and refrigeration markets. Based in Richardson, Texas, the company is 9.8% owned by John W. Norris, III, a descendant of DW Norris, who acquired the company in 1904. The company's largest production facilities are in Saltillo, Mexico, Marshalltown, Iowa, and Orangeburg, South Carolina.

The second and current incarnation of News Corporation, doing business as News Corp, is an American mass media and publishing company headquartered at 1211 Avenue of the Americas in Midtown Manhattan, New York City. The company was formed on June 28, 2013, as a spin-off of the first News Corporation, whose legal successor was 21st Century Fox, which held its media and entertainment assets. Operating across digital real estate information, news media, book publishing, and cable television, New...

LII vs TRI — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
TRI
TRI
1.5× larger
TRI
$1.8B
$1.2B
LII
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
TRI
TRI
+13.7% gap
TRI
2.6%
-11.2%
LII
Higher net margin
TRI
TRI
4.0% more per $
TRI
17.5%
13.6%
LII

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025

Metric
LII
LII
TRI
TRI
Revenue
$1.2B
$1.8B
Net Profit
$162.1M
$313.0M
Gross Margin
34.7%
Operating Margin
18.6%
24.4%
Net Margin
13.6%
17.5%
Revenue YoY
-11.2%
2.6%
Net Profit YoY
-18.0%
-62.8%
EPS (diluted)
$4.62
$0.69

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
LII
LII
TRI
TRI
Q4 25
$1.2B
Q3 25
$1.4B
Q2 25
$1.5B
$1.8B
Q1 25
$1.1B
Q4 24
$1.3B
Q3 24
$1.5B
Q2 24
$1.5B
$1.7B
Q1 24
$1.0B
Net Profit
LII
LII
TRI
TRI
Q4 25
$162.1M
Q3 25
$245.8M
Q2 25
$277.6M
$313.0M
Q1 25
$120.3M
Q4 24
$197.7M
Q3 24
$239.0M
Q2 24
$245.9M
$841.0M
Q1 24
$124.3M
Gross Margin
LII
LII
TRI
TRI
Q4 25
34.7%
Q3 25
32.8%
Q2 25
34.8%
Q1 25
30.6%
Q4 24
33.9%
Q3 24
32.6%
Q2 24
33.6%
Q1 24
32.5%
Operating Margin
LII
LII
TRI
TRI
Q4 25
18.6%
Q3 25
21.7%
Q2 25
23.6%
24.4%
Q1 25
14.5%
Q4 24
18.2%
Q3 24
20.2%
Q2 24
22.1%
23.9%
Q1 24
15.9%
Net Margin
LII
LII
TRI
TRI
Q4 25
13.6%
Q3 25
17.2%
Q2 25
18.5%
17.5%
Q1 25
11.2%
Q4 24
14.7%
Q3 24
16.0%
Q2 24
16.9%
48.3%
Q1 24
11.9%
EPS (diluted)
LII
LII
TRI
TRI
Q4 25
$4.62
Q3 25
$6.98
Q2 25
$7.82
$0.69
Q1 25
$3.37
Q4 24
$5.52
Q3 24
$6.68
Q2 24
$6.87
$1.86
Q1 24
$3.47

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
LII
LII
TRI
TRI
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$34.7M
$664.0M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$1.1B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$1.2B
$12.6B
Total Assets
$4.1B
$18.0B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.98×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
LII
LII
TRI
TRI
Q4 25
$34.7M
Q3 25
$59.2M
Q2 25
$55.1M
$664.0M
Q1 25
$222.9M
Q4 24
$422.3M
Q3 24
$255.7M
Q2 24
$57.8M
$1.7B
Q1 24
$57.6M
Total Debt
LII
LII
TRI
TRI
Q4 25
$1.1B
Q3 25
$838.2M
Q2 25
$835.7M
Q1 25
$834.2M
Q4 24
$833.1M
Q3 24
$827.6M
Q2 24
$1.1B
Q1 24
$1.2B
Stockholders' Equity
LII
LII
TRI
TRI
Q4 25
$1.2B
Q3 25
$1.1B
Q2 25
$900.5M
$12.6B
Q1 25
$852.5M
Q4 24
$850.2M
Q3 24
$754.0M
Q2 24
$577.4M
$11.6B
Q1 24
$368.8M
Total Assets
LII
LII
TRI
TRI
Q4 25
$4.1B
Q3 25
$3.5B
Q2 25
$3.7B
$18.0B
Q1 25
$3.5B
Q4 24
$3.5B
Q3 24
$3.3B
Q2 24
$3.2B
$18.4B
Q1 24
$3.0B
Debt / Equity
LII
LII
TRI
TRI
Q4 25
0.98×
Q3 25
0.78×
Q2 25
0.93×
Q1 25
0.98×
Q4 24
0.98×
Q3 24
1.10×
Q2 24
1.95×
Q1 24
3.13×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
LII
LII
TRI
TRI
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$405.9M
$746.0M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$376.7M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
31.5%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
2.4%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
2.50×
2.38×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$638.8M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
LII
LII
TRI
TRI
Q4 25
$405.9M
Q3 25
$300.7M
Q2 25
$86.8M
$746.0M
Q1 25
$-35.8M
Q4 24
$332.4M
Q3 24
$452.1M
Q2 24
$184.0M
$705.0M
Q1 24
$-22.8M
Free Cash Flow
LII
LII
TRI
TRI
Q4 25
$376.7M
Q3 25
$265.1M
Q2 25
$58.3M
Q1 25
$-61.3M
Q4 24
$272.2M
Q3 24
$410.9M
Q2 24
$151.3M
Q1 24
$-52.3M
FCF Margin
LII
LII
TRI
TRI
Q4 25
31.5%
Q3 25
18.6%
Q2 25
3.9%
Q1 25
-5.7%
Q4 24
20.2%
Q3 24
27.4%
Q2 24
10.4%
Q1 24
-5.0%
Capex Intensity
LII
LII
TRI
TRI
Q4 25
2.4%
Q3 25
2.5%
Q2 25
1.9%
Q1 25
2.4%
Q4 24
4.5%
Q3 24
2.8%
Q2 24
2.3%
Q1 24
2.8%
Cash Conversion
LII
LII
TRI
TRI
Q4 25
2.50×
Q3 25
1.22×
Q2 25
0.31×
2.38×
Q1 25
-0.30×
Q4 24
1.68×
Q3 24
1.89×
Q2 24
0.75×
0.84×
Q1 24
-0.18×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

LII
LII

Residential Heating And Cooling$699.8M59%
Commercial Heating And Cooling$495.2M41%

TRI
TRI

Segment breakdown not available.

Related Comparisons