vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of INTERLINK ELECTRONICS INC (LINK) and Token Cat Ltd (TC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
INTERLINK ELECTRONICS INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.9M vs $2.8M, roughly 1.0× Token Cat Ltd). Token Cat Ltd runs the higher net margin — -3.4% vs -20.1%, a 16.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, INTERLINK ELECTRONICS INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-4.5% vs -37.9%).
Interlink Electronics, Inc. is a technology company that specializes in manufacturing sensors that are used in electronic portable devices, such as smartphones, GPS systems, and in industrial computers and systems controls.
LINK vs TC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.9M | $2.8M |
| Net Profit | $-574.0K | $-93.0K |
| Gross Margin | 31.7% | 79.0% |
| Operating Margin | -25.7% | -206.9% |
| Net Margin | -20.1% | -3.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -4.5% | -37.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -39.0% | 98.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.01 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4M | $2.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.9M | $4.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-574.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-336.0K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $100.0K | $-93.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-805.0K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-413.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-523.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-307.0K | $-5.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-741.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | 31.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 41.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 45.0% | 79.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 35.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 39.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 41.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 45.0% | 69.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 40.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | -25.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -10.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.9% | -206.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -31.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -17.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -17.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -10.8% | -146.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -24.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | -20.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -11.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.9% | -3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -30.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -13.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -19.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -10.6% | -125.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -23.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-0.01 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.03 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.00 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.09 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.01 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.04 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.04 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.09 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.7M | $150.0K |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $1.4M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $9.2M | $4.6M |
| Total Assets | $11.7M | $28.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.30× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3M | $150.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.0M | $689.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $9.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.0M | $4.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.7M | $-787.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $11.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.5M | $28.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.2M | $12.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $14.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.30× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-356.0K | $-23.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-375.0K | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -13.1% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.7% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-168.0K | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-356.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $653.0K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-138.0K | $-23.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-271.0K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-223.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-68.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-298.0K | $-1.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $222.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | $-375.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $650.0K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-143.0K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-300.0K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-293.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-155.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-300.0K | $-1.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $204.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | -13.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -4.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -11.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -9.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -5.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -10.4% | -34.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.1% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.38× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LINK
| Transferred At Point In Time | $2.7M | 94% |
| Other | $185.0K | 6% |
TC
Segment breakdown not available.