vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of LKQ Corporation (LKQ) and Monster Beverage (MNST). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
LKQ Corporation is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.5B vs $2.1B, roughly 1.6× Monster Beverage). Monster Beverage runs the higher net margin — 21.1% vs 2.3%, a 18.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Monster Beverage posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (17.6% vs 4.3%). LKQ Corporation produced more free cash flow last quarter ($700.0M vs $351.2M). Over the past eight quarters, Monster Beverage's revenue compounded faster (5.9% CAGR vs -3.3%).
LKQ Corporation is an American provider of alternative and speciality parts to repair and accessorize automobiles and other vehicles. LKQ has operations in North America, Europe and Taiwan. LKQ sells replacement systems, components, equipment and parts to repair and accessorize automobiles, trucks, and recreational and performance vehicles.
Monster Beverage Corporation is an American beverage company that manufactures energy drinks including Monster Energy, Relentless, Reign and Burn. The company was originally founded as Hansen's in 1935 in Southern California, originally selling juice products. The company renamed itself as Monster Beverage in 2012.
LKQ vs MNST — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.5B | $2.1B |
| Net Profit | $79.0M | $449.2M |
| Gross Margin | 38.4% | 55.5% |
| Operating Margin | 6.3% | 25.5% |
| Net Margin | 2.3% | 21.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.3% | 17.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -53.3% | 65.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.0B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.5B | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6B | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.4B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.7B | $1.9B |
| Q1 26 | $79.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $66.0M | $449.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $180.0M | $524.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $193.0M | $488.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $169.0M | $443.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $157.0M | $270.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $192.0M | $370.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $186.0M | $425.4M |
| Q1 26 | 38.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 37.2% | 55.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 38.3% | 55.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 38.8% | 55.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 39.8% | 56.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 39.5% | 55.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 38.9% | 53.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 38.8% | 53.6% |
| Q1 26 | 6.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.9% | 25.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.8% | 30.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.6% | 29.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.3% | 30.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.1% | 21.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.6% | 25.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.9% | 27.7% |
| Q1 26 | 2.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.2% | 21.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.1% | 23.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.3% | 23.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.9% | 23.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.7% | 14.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.4% | 19.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.0% | 22.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.25 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.70 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.75 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.65 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.60 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.73 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.70 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $335.0M | $2.8B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $6.5B | $8.3B |
| Total Assets | $15.1B | $10.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $335.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $319.0M | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $289.0M | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $289.0M | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $227.0M | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $234.0M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $353.0M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $276.0M | $1.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $199.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $374.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $748.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $748.7M |
| Q1 26 | $6.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.5B | $8.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.6B | $7.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.5B | $7.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.2B | $6.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.0B | $6.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.2B | $5.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.1B | $5.9B |
| Q1 26 | $15.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $15.1B | $10.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.6B | $9.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.9B | $8.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.5B | $8.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.0B | $7.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.5B | $8.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.2B | $8.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.03× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.06× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.13× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.13× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-56.0M | $379.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $700.0M | $351.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 20.2% | 16.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.71× | 0.84× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.6B | $2.0B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $-56.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $330.0M | $379.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $440.0M | $745.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $296.0M | $466.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.0M | $507.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $235.0M | $461.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $420.0M | $618.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $213.0M | $436.3M |
| Q1 26 | $700.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $274.0M | $351.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $387.0M | $701.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $243.0M | $434.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-57.0M | $478.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $149.0M | $370.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $341.0M | $571.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $133.0M | $376.5M |
| Q1 26 | 20.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.0% | 16.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.1% | 31.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.7% | 20.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.6% | 25.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.4% | 20.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.5% | 30.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.6% | 19.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.8% | 1.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.5% | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.5% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.6% | 1.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.6% | 5.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.2% | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.2% | 3.1% |
| Q1 26 | -0.71× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.00× | 0.84× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.44× | 1.42× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.53× | 0.95× | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.02× | 1.15× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.50× | 1.71× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.19× | 1.67× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.15× | 1.03× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LKQ
| Europe | $1.6B | 46% |
| North America | $1.3B | 39% |
| Specialty | $408.0M | 12% |
| Other | $107.0M | 3% |
MNST
| Monster Energy Drinks Segment | $1.2B | 57% |
| Sales Revenue Product Line | $905.5M | 42% |
| Strategic Brands Segment | $50.3M | 2% |
| Alcohol Brands Segment | $29.0M | 1% |
