vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Limbach Holdings, Inc. (LMB) and Ingevity Corp (NGVT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Limbach Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($186.9M vs $185.4M, roughly 1.0× Ingevity Corp). Limbach Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 6.6% vs -45.6%, a 52.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Ingevity Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (36.7% vs 30.1%). Ingevity Corp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($73.5M vs $27.9M). Over the past eight quarters, Limbach Holdings, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (25.3% CAGR vs -26.2%).

Limbach Flugmotoren is a Chinese-owned company based in Germany that produces aircraft engines.

Ingevity Corp is a global specialty chemicals and advanced materials manufacturer. It produces high-performance carbon materials, pavement preservation solutions, and specialty chemicals, serving automotive emissions control, industrial purification, road infrastructure, and agricultural input markets across North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific.

LMB vs NGVT — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
LMB
LMB
1.0× larger
LMB
$186.9M
$185.4M
NGVT
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
NGVT
NGVT
+6.6% gap
NGVT
36.7%
30.1%
LMB
Higher net margin
LMB
LMB
52.2% more per $
LMB
6.6%
-45.6%
NGVT
More free cash flow
NGVT
NGVT
$45.6M more FCF
NGVT
$73.5M
$27.9M
LMB
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
LMB
LMB
Annualised
LMB
25.3%
-26.2%
NGVT

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
LMB
LMB
NGVT
NGVT
Revenue
$186.9M
$185.4M
Net Profit
$12.3M
$-84.6M
Gross Margin
25.7%
41.2%
Operating Margin
9.4%
-47.7%
Net Margin
6.6%
-45.6%
Revenue YoY
30.1%
36.7%
Net Profit YoY
25.0%
-609.6%
EPS (diluted)
$1.01
$-2.33

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
LMB
LMB
NGVT
NGVT
Q4 25
$186.9M
$185.4M
Q3 25
$184.6M
$333.1M
Q2 25
$142.2M
$365.1M
Q1 25
$133.1M
$284.0M
Q4 24
$143.7M
$135.6M
Q3 24
$133.9M
$333.8M
Q2 24
$122.2M
$390.6M
Q1 24
$119.0M
$340.1M
Net Profit
LMB
LMB
NGVT
NGVT
Q4 25
$12.3M
$-84.6M
Q3 25
$8.8M
$43.5M
Q2 25
$7.8M
$-146.5M
Q1 25
$10.2M
$20.5M
Q4 24
$9.8M
$16.6M
Q3 24
$7.5M
$-107.2M
Q2 24
$6.0M
$-283.7M
Q1 24
$7.6M
$-56.0M
Gross Margin
LMB
LMB
NGVT
NGVT
Q4 25
25.7%
41.2%
Q3 25
24.2%
40.2%
Q2 25
28.0%
37.8%
Q1 25
27.6%
39.9%
Q4 24
30.3%
81.3%
Q3 24
27.0%
39.4%
Q2 24
27.4%
31.5%
Q1 24
26.1%
29.3%
Operating Margin
LMB
LMB
NGVT
NGVT
Q4 25
9.4%
-47.7%
Q3 25
7.2%
18.7%
Q2 25
7.5%
-39.1%
Q1 25
5.9%
9.4%
Q4 24
9.1%
Q3 24
8.1%
33.0%
Q2 24
6.7%
25.9%
Q1 24
5.5%
22.6%
Net Margin
LMB
LMB
NGVT
NGVT
Q4 25
6.6%
-45.6%
Q3 25
4.8%
13.1%
Q2 25
5.5%
-40.1%
Q1 25
7.7%
7.2%
Q4 24
6.9%
12.2%
Q3 24
5.6%
-32.1%
Q2 24
4.9%
-72.6%
Q1 24
6.4%
-16.5%
EPS (diluted)
LMB
LMB
NGVT
NGVT
Q4 25
$1.01
$-2.33
Q3 25
$0.73
$1.18
Q2 25
$0.64
$-4.02
Q1 25
$0.85
$0.56
Q4 24
$0.81
$0.44
Q3 24
$0.62
$-2.94
Q2 24
$0.50
$-7.81
Q1 24
$0.64
$-1.54

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
LMB
LMB
NGVT
NGVT
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$11.3M
$78.1M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$30.5M
$1.2B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$195.7M
$29.7M
Total Assets
$381.1M
$1.7B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.16×
39.10×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
LMB
LMB
NGVT
NGVT
Q4 25
$11.3M
$78.1M
Q3 25
$9.8M
$83.4M
Q2 25
$38.9M
$76.9M
Q1 25
$38.1M
$71.5M
Q4 24
$44.9M
$68.0M
Q3 24
$51.2M
$135.5M
Q2 24
$59.5M
$107.4M
Q1 24
$48.2M
$88.5M
Total Debt
LMB
LMB
NGVT
NGVT
Q4 25
$30.5M
$1.2B
Q3 25
$56.3M
$1.2B
Q2 25
$28.4M
$1.2B
Q1 25
$23.7M
$1.3B
Q4 24
$23.6M
$1.3B
Q3 24
$20.5M
$1.4B
Q2 24
$19.7M
$1.4B
Q1 24
$19.4M
$1.4B
Stockholders' Equity
LMB
LMB
NGVT
NGVT
Q4 25
$195.7M
$29.7M
Q3 25
$181.6M
$138.1M
Q2 25
$170.5M
$120.7M
Q1 25
$161.1M
$234.6M
Q4 24
$153.5M
$195.2M
Q3 24
$142.2M
$214.5M
Q2 24
$133.0M
$284.8M
Q1 24
$125.5M
$568.2M
Total Assets
LMB
LMB
NGVT
NGVT
Q4 25
$381.1M
$1.7B
Q3 25
$409.1M
$1.8B
Q2 25
$343.0M
$1.9B
Q1 25
$336.4M
$2.1B
Q4 24
$352.1M
$2.0B
Q3 24
$324.4M
$2.2B
Q2 24
$303.9M
$2.3B
Q1 24
$289.2M
$2.6B
Debt / Equity
LMB
LMB
NGVT
NGVT
Q4 25
0.16×
39.10×
Q3 25
0.31×
8.39×
Q2 25
0.17×
10.24×
Q1 25
0.15×
5.68×
Q4 24
0.15×
6.86×
Q3 24
0.14×
6.52×
Q2 24
0.15×
4.92×
Q1 24
0.15×
2.48×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
LMB
LMB
NGVT
NGVT
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$28.1M
$97.1M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$27.9M
$73.5M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
14.9%
39.6%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
0.1%
12.7%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
2.29×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$41.9M
$273.5M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
LMB
LMB
NGVT
NGVT
Q4 25
$28.1M
$97.1M
Q3 25
$13.3M
$129.7M
Q2 25
$2.0M
$79.0M
Q1 25
$2.2M
$25.4M
Q4 24
$19.3M
$64.5M
Q3 24
$4.9M
$46.5M
Q2 24
$16.5M
$29.7M
Q1 24
$-3.9M
$-12.1M
Free Cash Flow
LMB
LMB
NGVT
NGVT
Q4 25
$27.9M
$73.5M
Q3 25
$12.8M
$117.8M
Q2 25
$1.2M
$66.8M
Q1 25
$11.0K
$15.4M
Q4 24
$18.0M
$39.6M
Q3 24
$4.6M
$28.5M
Q2 24
$13.2M
$11.6M
Q1 24
$-6.5M
$-28.7M
FCF Margin
LMB
LMB
NGVT
NGVT
Q4 25
14.9%
39.6%
Q3 25
7.0%
35.4%
Q2 25
0.8%
18.3%
Q1 25
0.0%
5.4%
Q4 24
12.5%
29.2%
Q3 24
3.4%
8.5%
Q2 24
10.8%
3.0%
Q1 24
-5.5%
-8.4%
Capex Intensity
LMB
LMB
NGVT
NGVT
Q4 25
0.1%
12.7%
Q3 25
0.3%
3.6%
Q2 25
0.6%
3.3%
Q1 25
1.7%
3.5%
Q4 24
0.9%
18.4%
Q3 24
0.3%
5.4%
Q2 24
2.7%
4.6%
Q1 24
2.1%
4.9%
Cash Conversion
LMB
LMB
NGVT
NGVT
Q4 25
2.29×
Q3 25
1.52×
2.98×
Q2 25
0.26×
Q1 25
0.22×
1.24×
Q4 24
1.96×
3.89×
Q3 24
0.66×
Q2 24
2.77×
Q1 24
-0.52×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

LMB
LMB

Owner Direct Relationships Segment$145.0M78%
General Contractor Construction Manager Relationships Segment$41.9M22%

NGVT
NGVT

Performance Materials$151.2M82%
Advanced Polymer Technologies Segment$36.5M20%

Related Comparisons