vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Limbach Holdings, Inc. (LMB) and SITIME Corp (SITM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Limbach Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($186.9M vs $113.3M, roughly 1.6× SITIME Corp). SITIME Corp runs the higher net margin — 8.1% vs 6.6%, a 1.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SITIME Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (66.3% vs 30.1%). Limbach Holdings, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($27.9M vs $13.0M). Over the past eight quarters, SITIME Corp's revenue compounded faster (85.2% CAGR vs 25.3%).
Limbach Flugmotoren is a Chinese-owned company based in Germany that produces aircraft engines.
SiTime Corporation is a publicly traded fabless chipmaker based in Santa Clara, California that develops micro-electromechanical systems (MEMS), used for timing devices in electronics.
LMB vs SITM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $186.9M | $113.3M |
| Net Profit | $12.3M | $9.2M |
| Gross Margin | 25.7% | 56.4% |
| Operating Margin | 9.4% | 1.6% |
| Net Margin | 6.6% | 8.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 30.1% | 66.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 25.0% | 148.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.01 | $0.44 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $186.9M | $113.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $184.6M | $83.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $142.2M | $69.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $133.1M | $60.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $143.7M | $68.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $133.9M | $57.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $122.2M | $43.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $119.0M | $33.0M |
| Q4 25 | $12.3M | $9.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.8M | $-8.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.8M | $-20.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.2M | $-23.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.8M | $-18.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.5M | $-19.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.0M | $-26.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.6M | $-28.7M |
| Q4 25 | 25.7% | 56.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.2% | 53.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.0% | 51.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.6% | 50.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 30.3% | 52.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.0% | 51.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.4% | 49.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 26.1% | 53.5% |
| Q4 25 | 9.4% | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.2% | -19.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.5% | -35.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.9% | -46.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.1% | -33.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.1% | -43.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.7% | -73.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.5% | -106.1% |
| Q4 25 | 6.6% | 8.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.8% | -9.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.5% | -29.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.7% | -39.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.9% | -27.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.6% | -33.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.9% | -61.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.4% | -86.9% |
| Q4 25 | $1.01 | $0.44 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.73 | $-0.31 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.64 | $-0.84 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.85 | $-1.01 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.81 | $-0.80 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.62 | $-0.83 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.50 | $-1.16 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.64 | $-1.26 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $11.3M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $30.5M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $195.7M | $1.2B |
| Total Assets | $381.1M | $1.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.16× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $11.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $38.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $38.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $44.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $59.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $48.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $30.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $56.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $19.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | $195.7M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $181.6M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $170.5M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $161.1M | $692.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $153.5M | $699.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $142.2M | $696.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $133.0M | $692.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $125.5M | $696.2M |
| Q4 25 | $381.1M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $409.1M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $343.0M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $336.4M | $872.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $352.1M | $885.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $324.4M | $877.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $303.9M | $878.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $289.2M | $942.6M |
| Q4 25 | 0.16× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.31× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.17× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.15× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.15× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.14× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.15× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.15× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $28.1M | $25.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $27.9M | $13.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 14.9% | 11.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.1% | 10.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.29× | 2.77× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $41.9M | $35.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $28.1M | $25.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.3M | $31.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0M | $15.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.2M | $15.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.3M | $13.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.9M | $8.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.5M | $-181.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.9M | $1.7M |
| Q4 25 | $27.9M | $13.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.8M | $26.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2M | $-2.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.0K | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $18.0M | $-2.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.6M | $-6.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.2M | $-2.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-6.5M | $-1.2M |
| Q4 25 | 14.9% | 11.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.0% | 31.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | -4.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.0% | -2.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.5% | -3.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.4% | -11.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.8% | -6.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.5% | -3.6% |
| Q4 25 | 0.1% | 10.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.3% | 6.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.6% | 26.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.7% | 27.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.9% | 23.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.3% | 25.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.7% | 5.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.1% | 8.8% |
| Q4 25 | 2.29× | 2.77× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.52× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.26× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.22× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.96× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.66× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.77× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.52× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LMB
| Owner Direct Relationships Segment | $145.0M | 78% |
| General Contractor Construction Manager Relationships Segment | $41.9M | 22% |
SITM
Segment breakdown not available.
