vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of LINDSAY CORP (LNN) and UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC (UTI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($220.8M vs $150.7M, roughly 1.5× LINDSAY CORP). LINDSAY CORP runs the higher net margin — 11.0% vs 5.8%, a 5.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.6% vs -6.1%). LINDSAY CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-15.1M vs $-19.2M). Over the past eight quarters, UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC's revenue compounded faster (9.5% CAGR vs 1.3%).

Lindsay Corporation, formerly known as Lindsay Manufacturing Co., is a manufacturer of Zimmatic brand center pivot irrigation systems, based in Omaha, Nebraska, United States. It also manufactures farm and construction machinery, as well as road and railroad infrastructure equipment. At August 31, 2008, the company had 1,239 employees.

Universal Technical Institute, Inc. (UTI) is a private for-profit system of technical colleges in the United States. It was established in 1965 by Robert Sweet.

LNN vs UTI — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
UTI
UTI
1.5× larger
UTI
$220.8M
$150.7M
LNN
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
UTI
UTI
+15.8% gap
UTI
9.6%
-6.1%
LNN
Higher net margin
LNN
LNN
5.2% more per $
LNN
11.0%
5.8%
UTI
More free cash flow
LNN
LNN
$4.1M more FCF
LNN
$-15.1M
$-19.2M
UTI
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
UTI
UTI
Annualised
UTI
9.5%
1.3%
LNN

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
LNN
LNN
UTI
UTI
Revenue
$150.7M
$220.8M
Net Profit
$16.5M
$12.8M
Gross Margin
33.3%
Operating Margin
13.0%
7.1%
Net Margin
11.0%
5.8%
Revenue YoY
-6.1%
9.6%
Net Profit YoY
-3.7%
-42.1%
EPS (diluted)
$1.54
$0.23

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
LNN
LNN
UTI
UTI
Q4 25
$150.7M
$220.8M
Q3 25
$149.0M
$222.4M
Q2 25
$165.7M
$204.3M
Q1 25
$183.8M
$207.4M
Q4 24
$160.5M
$201.4M
Q3 24
$149.4M
$196.4M
Q2 24
$133.7M
$177.5M
Q1 24
$146.8M
$184.2M
Net Profit
LNN
LNN
UTI
UTI
Q4 25
$16.5M
$12.8M
Q3 25
$10.8M
$18.8M
Q2 25
$19.5M
$10.7M
Q1 25
$26.6M
$11.4M
Q4 24
$17.2M
$22.2M
Q3 24
$12.7M
$18.8M
Q2 24
$20.4M
$5.0M
Q1 24
$18.1M
$7.8M
Gross Margin
LNN
LNN
UTI
UTI
Q4 25
33.3%
Q3 25
30.0%
Q2 25
32.4%
Q1 25
34.0%
Q4 24
31.1%
Q3 24
30.6%
Q2 24
34.8%
Q1 24
33.3%
Operating Margin
LNN
LNN
UTI
UTI
Q4 25
13.0%
7.1%
Q3 25
7.6%
11.2%
Q2 25
14.4%
6.9%
Q1 25
17.5%
8.1%
Q4 24
13.0%
13.6%
Q3 24
9.0%
13.3%
Q2 24
14.9%
4.2%
Q1 24
15.1%
6.1%
Net Margin
LNN
LNN
UTI
UTI
Q4 25
11.0%
5.8%
Q3 25
7.3%
8.4%
Q2 25
11.8%
5.2%
Q1 25
14.5%
5.5%
Q4 24
10.7%
11.0%
Q3 24
8.5%
9.6%
Q2 24
15.2%
2.8%
Q1 24
12.3%
4.2%
EPS (diluted)
LNN
LNN
UTI
UTI
Q4 25
$1.54
$0.23
Q3 25
$0.99
$0.33
Q2 25
$1.78
$0.19
Q1 25
$2.44
$0.21
Q4 24
$1.57
$0.40
Q3 24
$1.16
$0.35
Q2 24
$1.85
$0.09
Q1 24
$1.64
$0.14

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
LNN
LNN
UTI
UTI
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$199.6M
$162.8M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$115.2M
$101.4M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$518.2M
$335.9M
Total Assets
$828.4M
$834.0M
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.22×
0.30×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
LNN
LNN
UTI
UTI
Q4 25
$199.6M
$162.8M
Q3 25
$250.6M
$169.1M
Q2 25
$210.8M
$70.7M
Q1 25
$186.7M
$96.0M
Q4 24
$194.1M
$172.0M
Q3 24
$190.9M
$161.9M
Q2 24
$152.7M
$115.5M
Q1 24
$150.6M
$116.1M
Total Debt
LNN
LNN
UTI
UTI
Q4 25
$115.2M
$101.4M
Q3 25
$115.3M
$87.1M
Q2 25
$115.3M
$73.8M
Q1 25
$115.4M
$94.4M
Q4 24
$115.4M
$120.1M
Q3 24
$115.5M
$125.7M
Q2 24
$115.5M
$137.3M
Q1 24
$115.6M
$141.9M
Stockholders' Equity
LNN
LNN
UTI
UTI
Q4 25
$518.2M
$335.9M
Q3 25
$532.9M
$328.1M
Q2 25
$528.8M
$306.8M
Q1 25
$516.4M
$293.9M
Q4 24
$488.5M
$280.0M
Q3 24
$480.9M
$260.2M
Q2 24
$480.0M
$239.4M
Q1 24
$483.0M
$232.6M
Total Assets
LNN
LNN
UTI
UTI
Q4 25
$828.4M
$834.0M
Q3 25
$840.8M
$826.1M
Q2 25
$840.9M
$740.8M
Q1 25
$814.2M
$720.4M
Q4 24
$771.0M
$753.8M
Q3 24
$760.2M
$744.6M
Q2 24
$758.1M
$706.0M
Q1 24
$765.3M
$702.1M
Debt / Equity
LNN
LNN
UTI
UTI
Q4 25
0.22×
0.30×
Q3 25
0.22×
0.27×
Q2 25
0.22×
0.24×
Q1 25
0.22×
0.32×
Q4 24
0.24×
0.43×
Q3 24
0.24×
0.48×
Q2 24
0.24×
0.57×
Q1 24
0.24×
0.61×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
LNN
LNN
UTI
UTI
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$-597.0K
$3.1M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$-15.1M
$-19.2M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
-10.0%
-8.7%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
9.6%
10.1%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
-0.04×
0.24×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$62.9M
$16.6M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
LNN
LNN
UTI
UTI
Q4 25
$-597.0K
$3.1M
Q3 25
$64.0M
$57.1M
Q2 25
$35.0M
$18.1M
Q1 25
$12.3M
$-789.0K
Q4 24
$21.6M
$23.0M
Q3 24
$53.1M
$67.5M
Q2 24
$30.5M
$10.0M
Q1 24
$-9.7M
$-2.5M
Free Cash Flow
LNN
LNN
UTI
UTI
Q4 25
$-15.1M
$-19.2M
Q3 25
$49.8M
$40.6M
Q2 25
$25.7M
$6.8M
Q1 25
$2.5M
$-11.7M
Q4 24
$12.5M
$19.6M
Q3 24
$47.7M
$60.0M
Q2 24
$25.8M
$3.0M
Q1 24
$-21.6M
$-8.4M
FCF Margin
LNN
LNN
UTI
UTI
Q4 25
-10.0%
-8.7%
Q3 25
33.4%
18.3%
Q2 25
15.5%
3.4%
Q1 25
1.4%
-5.7%
Q4 24
7.8%
9.7%
Q3 24
31.9%
30.6%
Q2 24
19.3%
1.7%
Q1 24
-14.7%
-4.6%
Capex Intensity
LNN
LNN
UTI
UTI
Q4 25
9.6%
10.1%
Q3 25
9.6%
7.4%
Q2 25
5.6%
5.5%
Q1 25
5.3%
5.3%
Q4 24
5.7%
1.7%
Q3 24
3.6%
3.8%
Q2 24
3.6%
4.0%
Q1 24
8.1%
3.2%
Cash Conversion
LNN
LNN
UTI
UTI
Q4 25
-0.04×
0.24×
Q3 25
5.92×
3.04×
Q2 25
1.79×
1.69×
Q1 25
0.46×
-0.07×
Q4 24
1.26×
1.04×
Q3 24
4.17×
3.58×
Q2 24
1.50×
2.01×
Q1 24
-0.54×
-0.32×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

LNN
LNN

Transferred At Point In Time$133.2M88%
Infrastructure$13.4M9%
Transferred Over Time$8.0M5%

UTI
UTI

UTI$142.8M65%
Concorde$78.0M35%

Related Comparisons