vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of LanzaTech Global, Inc. (LNZA) and Rumble Inc. (RUM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
LanzaTech Global, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($28.0M vs $27.1M, roughly 1.0× Rumble Inc.). LanzaTech Global, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -0.3% vs -120.8%, a 120.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, LanzaTech Global, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (132.7% vs -10.5%). LanzaTech Global, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-6.4M vs $-31.7M). Over the past eight quarters, LanzaTech Global, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (65.3% CAGR vs 15.2%).
LanzaTech Global, Inc. is a sustainable biotechnology company that develops proprietary carbon recycling technology to convert waste carbon emissions from industrial facilities, manufacturing sites and other sources into low-carbon fuels, chemicals and commercial materials. It operates globally across industrial, energy and consumer goods sectors, partnering with enterprises to reduce carbon footprints and advance circular economy goals.
Rumble is a Canadian-American online video platform, web hosting, and cloud services business headquartered in Toronto, Canada, with its U.S. headquarters in Longboat Key, Florida. It was founded in 2013 by Chris Pavlovski, a Canadian technology entrepreneur. Rumble's cloud services business hosts Truth Social, and the video platform is popular among American conservative and far-right users. Rumble has been described as "alt-tech".
LNZA vs RUM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $28.0M | $27.1M |
| Net Profit | $-84.0K | $-32.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | 5.5% |
| Operating Margin | -0.7% | -131.1% |
| Net Margin | -0.3% | -120.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 132.7% | -10.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 99.7% | 86.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-23.01 | $-0.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $28.0M | $27.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.3M | $24.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.5M | $23.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.0M | $30.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.9M | $25.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.4M | $22.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.2M | $17.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-84.0K | $-32.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.9M | $-16.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-32.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-19.2M | $-2.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-27.0M | $-236.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-57.4M | $-31.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-27.8M | $-26.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-25.5M | $-43.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -26.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -14.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -45.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -58.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -79.5% |
| Q4 25 | -0.7% | -131.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -168.7% | -113.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -354.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -327.5% | -153.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -224.6% | -80.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -331.5% | -131.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -131.2% | -172.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -255.3% | -197.4% |
| Q4 25 | -0.3% | -120.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 30.8% | -65.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -357.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -202.8% | -11.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -224.4% | -783.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -577.6% | -125.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -160.0% | -119.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -249.0% | -244.1% |
| Q4 25 | $-23.01 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.99 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.15 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.10 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-40.40 | $-1.17 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-29.04 | $-0.15 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.14 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.13 | $-0.21 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $13.2M | $237.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-3.9M | $274.8M |
| Total Assets | $100.2M | $336.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $13.2M | $237.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.6M | $269.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $37.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.8M | $301.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $43.5M | $114.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $58.7M | $132.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $62.2M | $154.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $56.7M | $183.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-3.9M | $274.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.0M | $302.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-25.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.2M | $339.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.4M | $-63.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.6M | $166.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $67.5M | $192.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $91.8M | $210.7M |
| Q4 25 | $100.2M | $336.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $99.3M | $367.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $116.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $125.8M | $391.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $174.7M | $195.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $216.2M | $217.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $211.9M | $243.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $214.5M | $263.0M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-6.2M | $-29.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-6.4M | $-31.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -22.8% | -117.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.8% | 8.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-66.1M | $-70.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-6.2M | $-29.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-15.9M | $-10.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-21.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-21.1M | $-14.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-19.7M | $-12.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-26.4M | $-19.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-14.7M | $-21.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-28.3M | $-33.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-6.4M | $-31.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-16.0M | $-12.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-21.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-21.8M | $-14.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-21.4M | $-12.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-26.7M | $-19.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-16.4M | $-23.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-29.8M | $-34.3M |
| Q4 25 | -22.8% | -117.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -172.9% | -48.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -240.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -230.0% | -61.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -178.1% | -40.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -268.8% | -79.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -94.6% | -102.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -290.6% | -193.3% |
| Q4 25 | 0.8% | 8.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.8% | 5.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.5% | 0.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.6% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.9% | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.3% | 6.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 14.4% | 2.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -5.55× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LNZA
Segment breakdown not available.
RUM
| Audience Monetization | $23.8M | 88% |
| Other Initiatives | $3.3M | 12% |
