vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Lovesac Co (LOVE) and MARA Holdings, Inc. (MARA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MARA Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($202.3M vs $150.2M, roughly 1.3× Lovesac Co). Lovesac Co runs the higher net margin — -7.0% vs -14298.3%, a 14291.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Lovesac Co posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (0.2% vs -5.6%). Lovesac Co produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-10.2M vs $-1.2B). Over the past eight quarters, MARA Holdings, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (10.7% CAGR vs -22.6%).
The Lovesac Company is an American furniture retailer, specializing in a patented modular furniture system called Sactionals. Sactionals consist of two combinable pieces, “Seats” and “Sides,” as well as custom-fit covers and associated accessories. Lovesac also sells Sacs, a bag seat filled with a proprietary foam mixture.
MARA Holdings, Inc. is an American digital asset technology and cryptocurrency mining company headquartered in Fort Lauderdale, Florida. Founded in 2010, the company initially operated as a patent holding company before pivoting in the late 2010s to focus on blockchain infrastructure and digital assets.
LOVE vs MARA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $150.2M | $202.3M |
| Net Profit | $-10.6M | $-1.7B |
| Gross Margin | 56.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | -10.5% | -11795.9% |
| Net Margin | -7.0% | -14298.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.2% | -5.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -114.0% | -423.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.72 | $-4.25 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $150.2M | $202.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $160.5M | $252.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $138.4M | $238.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $241.5M | $213.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $149.9M | $214.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $156.6M | $131.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $132.6M | $145.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $250.5M | $165.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-10.6M | $-1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $-6.7M | $123.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-10.8M | $808.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $35.3M | $-533.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.9M | $528.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-5.9M | $-124.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-13.0M | $-199.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $31.0M | $337.2M |
| Q4 25 | 56.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 56.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 53.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 60.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 58.5% | -2613.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 59.0% | -1065.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 54.3% | -587.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 59.7% | -289.4% |
| Q4 25 | -10.5% | -11795.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -5.5% | 18.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -10.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.7% | -253.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -5.3% | -130.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -13.5% | -160.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 16.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | -7.0% | -14298.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -4.1% | 48.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -7.8% | 338.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.6% | -249.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.3% | 5367.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -3.7% | -94.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -9.8% | -137.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.4% | 204.1% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.72 | $-4.25 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.45 | $0.27 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.73 | $1.84 | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.22 | $-1.55 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.32 | $1.60 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.38 | $-0.42 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.83 | $-0.72 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.91 | $1.26 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $23.7M | $547.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $3.6B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $189.3M | $3.5B |
| Total Assets | $495.5M | $7.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.04× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $23.7M | $547.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $34.2M | $826.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.9M | $109.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $83.7M | $196.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $61.7M | $391.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $72.1M | $164.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $72.4M | $256.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $87.0M | $324.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $3.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $618.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $189.3M | $3.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $197.5M | $5.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $201.2M | $4.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $216.4M | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $196.5M | $4.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $202.1M | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $205.3M | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $217.5M | $2.5B |
| Q4 25 | $495.5M | $7.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $493.7M | $9.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $483.7M | $7.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $532.3M | $6.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $499.7M | $6.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $481.1M | $3.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $477.2M | $3.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $482.2M | $3.0B |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.04× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.63× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.47× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.62× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.59× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.22× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-4.9M | $-802.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-10.2M | $-1.2B |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -6.8% | -598.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.5% | 201.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-13.6M | $-2.0B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-4.9M | $-802.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.2M | $-199.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-41.4M | $-163.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $44.0M | $-215.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.2M | $-677.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.2M | $-160.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-7.0M | $-115.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $56.3M | $-88.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-10.2M | $-1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.8M | $-283.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-50.0M | $-282.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $38.7M | $-254.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-6.6M | $-927.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $119.0K | $-198.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-14.3M | $-132.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $49.5M | $-97.4M |
| Q4 25 | -6.8% | -598.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.9% | -112.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -36.1% | -118.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.0% | -118.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.4% | -432.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.1% | -150.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -10.8% | -91.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 19.8% | -59.0% |
| Q4 25 | 3.5% | 201.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.7% | 33.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.2% | 49.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | 18.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.6% | 117.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.9% | 28.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.5% | 11.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.7% | 5.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1.62× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.20× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.25× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -1.28× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.82× | -0.26× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LOVE
| Showrooms | $102.7M | 68% |
| Internet | $37.3M | 25% |
| Other | $10.2M | 7% |
MARA
Segment breakdown not available.