vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Lovesac Co (LOVE) and DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC (PLOW). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($184.5M vs $150.2M, roughly 1.2× Lovesac Co). DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC runs the higher net margin — 7.0% vs -7.0%, a 14.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (28.6% vs 0.2%). DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($92.8M vs $-10.2M). Over the past eight quarters, DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC's revenue compounded faster (38.9% CAGR vs -22.6%).
The Lovesac Company is an American furniture retailer, specializing in a patented modular furniture system called Sactionals. Sactionals consist of two combinable pieces, “Seats” and “Sides,” as well as custom-fit covers and associated accessories. Lovesac also sells Sacs, a bag seat filled with a proprietary foam mixture.
General Dynamics Corporation (GD) is an American industrial and technology company based in Reston, Virginia. It is primarily a developer and producer of advanced military equipment of a wide variety, such as nuclear submarines, main battle tanks, and armoured fighting vehicles. It is also the manufacturer of the civilian aviation Gulfstream business jets and a provider of information technology services. The company is the 3rd largest of the top 100 contractors of the U.S. federal government...
LOVE vs PLOW — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $150.2M | $184.5M |
| Net Profit | $-10.6M | $12.8M |
| Gross Margin | 56.1% | 26.1% |
| Operating Margin | -10.5% | 10.5% |
| Net Margin | -7.0% | 7.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.2% | 28.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -114.0% | 62.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.72 | $0.54 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $150.2M | $184.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $160.5M | $162.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $138.4M | $194.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $241.5M | $115.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $149.9M | $143.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $156.6M | $129.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $132.6M | $199.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $250.5M | $95.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-10.6M | $12.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-6.7M | $8.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-10.8M | $26.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $35.3M | $148.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.9M | $7.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-5.9M | $32.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-13.0M | $24.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $31.0M | $-8.4M |
| Q4 25 | 56.1% | 26.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 56.4% | 23.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 53.7% | 31.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 60.4% | 24.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 58.5% | 24.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 59.0% | 23.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 54.3% | 30.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 59.7% | 19.8% |
| Q4 25 | -10.5% | 10.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -5.5% | 8.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -10.8% | 19.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.7% | 2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.2% | 9.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -5.3% | 35.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -13.5% | 18.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 16.1% | -6.7% |
| Q4 25 | -7.0% | 7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -4.1% | 4.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -7.8% | 13.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.6% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.3% | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -3.7% | 24.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -9.8% | 12.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.4% | -8.7% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.72 | $0.54 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.45 | $0.33 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.73 | $1.09 | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.22 | $0.00 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.32 | $0.35 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.38 | $1.36 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.83 | $1.02 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.91 | $-0.37 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $23.7M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $144.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $189.3M | $281.4M |
| Total Assets | $495.5M | $626.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.51× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $23.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $34.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $83.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $61.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $72.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $72.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $87.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $144.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $147.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $189.3M | $281.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $197.5M | $275.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $201.2M | $273.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $216.4M | $258.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $196.5M | $264.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $202.1M | $260.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $205.3M | $236.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $217.5M | $217.2M |
| Q4 25 | $495.5M | $626.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $493.7M | $694.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $483.7M | $671.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $532.3M | $621.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $499.7M | $590.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $481.1M | $665.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $477.2M | $617.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $482.2M | $577.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.51× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.56× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-4.9M | $95.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-10.2M | $92.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -6.8% | 50.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.5% | 1.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 7.47× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-13.6M | $63.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-4.9M | $95.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.2M | $-8.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-41.4M | $-11.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $44.0M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.2M | $74.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.2M | $-14.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-7.0M | $2.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $56.3M | $-21.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-10.2M | $92.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.8M | $-11.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-50.0M | $-14.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $38.7M | $-3.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-6.6M | $70.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $119.0K | $-15.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-14.3M | $836.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $49.5M | $-22.4M |
| Q4 25 | -6.8% | 50.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.9% | -7.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -36.1% | -7.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.0% | -3.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.4% | 48.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.1% | -11.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -10.8% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 19.8% | -23.4% |
| Q4 25 | 3.5% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.7% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.2% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | 1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.6% | 2.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.9% | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.5% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.7% | 0.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 7.47× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1.07× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.44× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.25× | -9.03× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 9.41× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -0.44× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.10× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.82× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LOVE
| Showrooms | $102.7M | 68% |
| Internet | $37.3M | 25% |
| Other | $10.2M | 7% |
PLOW
| Work Truck Solutions | $101.5M | 55% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $83.1M | 45% |
