vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Logistic Properties of the Americas (LPA) and System1, Inc. (SST). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
System1, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($51.9M vs $50.1M, roughly 1.0× Logistic Properties of the Americas). Logistic Properties of the Americas runs the higher net margin — 32.1% vs -26.0%, a 58.1% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Logistic Properties of the Americas is a specialized industrial real estate firm that acquires, develops and manages logistics properties across North, Central and South America. Its portfolio includes distribution centers, warehouses and last-mile delivery facilities, serving e-commerce, retail, manufacturing and third-party logistics clients.
System1 is an American Internet advertising company. Formerly known as OpenMail, it was founded in 2013. It describes itself as operating a "Responsive Acquisition Marketing Platform", and cites privacy as one of its principal foci, although it has been criticized for its influence on privacy-focused properties, including search engine Startpage.com. It is headquartered in Marina del Rey, California.
LPA vs SST — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $50.1M | $51.9M |
| Net Profit | $16.1M | $-13.5M |
| Gross Margin | — | 41.0% |
| Operating Margin | 81.7% | -33.6% |
| Net Margin | 32.1% | -26.0% |
| Revenue YoY | — | -31.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 4.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.33 | $-3.58 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $50.1M | $51.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $32.7M | $61.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.5M | $78.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.5M | $74.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $75.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.2M | $88.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $94.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.2M | $84.9M |
| Q4 25 | $16.1M | $-13.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-18.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-17.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-15.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-14.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-23.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-26.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-10.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | 41.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 36.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 35.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 38.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 42.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 28.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 27.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 21.9% |
| Q4 25 | 81.7% | -33.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -25.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -20.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -17.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -15.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -24.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -30.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -30.4% |
| Q4 25 | 32.1% | -26.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -30.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -22.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -21.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -18.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -26.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -27.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -12.4% |
| Q4 25 | $0.33 | $-3.58 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.09 | $-2.30 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.06 | $-2.23 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-3.41 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.26 | $-3.37 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-3.80 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.16 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $27.3M | $86.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $296.8M | $305.1M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $324.6M | $30.5M |
| Total Assets | $700.8M | $405.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.91× | 10.01× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $27.3M | $86.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $54.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $63.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $43.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $63.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $69.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $75.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1M | $69.9M |
| Q4 25 | $296.8M | $305.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $259.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $263.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $267.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $255.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $259.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $263.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $268.6M |
| Q4 25 | $324.6M | $30.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $42.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $58.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $67.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $80.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $90.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $109.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $131.7M |
| Q4 25 | $700.8M | $405.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $385.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $429.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $419.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $459.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $479.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $511.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $521.1M |
| Q4 25 | 0.91× | 10.01× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.07× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.53× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.98× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.18× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.87× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.41× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.04× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $21.6M | $-10.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $21.4M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 42.7% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.3% | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.34× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $12.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $21.6M | $-10.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.4M | $-2.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.2M | $24.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.4M | $-15.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $772.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.3M | $-5.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $10.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.8M | $-16.0M |
| Q4 25 | $21.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $966.4K | $-16.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.4M | $-36.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $218.9K | — |
| Q4 25 | 42.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -22.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -14.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.2% | -21.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -12.3% | -0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.3% | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 66.1% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 47.9% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 32.5% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 55.5% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 50.0% | 0.0% |
| Q4 25 | 1.34× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.