vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of LIQUIDITY SERVICES INC (LQDT) and PROCEPT BioRobotics Corp (PRCT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
LIQUIDITY SERVICES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($121.2M vs $83.1M, roughly 1.5× PROCEPT BioRobotics Corp). LIQUIDITY SERVICES INC runs the higher net margin — 6.2% vs -38.1%, a 44.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, PROCEPT BioRobotics Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (20.2% vs -0.9%). Over the past eight quarters, PROCEPT BioRobotics Corp's revenue compounded faster (24.8% CAGR vs 15.1%).
Liquidity Services, Inc. is an American e-commerce company providing surplus asset management services through a network of online marketplaces. It serves businesses and government agencies by facilitating the resale of surplus, returned, and end-of-life goods. Founded in 1999 and headquartered in Bethesda, Maryland, United States.
PROCEPT BioRobotics Corp is a medical tech firm developing and commercializing robotic surgical solutions for urological care. Its flagship AquaBeam system provides image-guided minimally invasive therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia, serving providers and patients across North America, Europe and global markets.
LQDT vs PRCT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $121.2M | $83.1M |
| Net Profit | $7.5M | $-31.6M |
| Gross Margin | 47.0% | 64.9% |
| Operating Margin | 7.7% | -4.1% |
| Net Margin | 6.2% | -38.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -0.9% | 20.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 28.9% | -27.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.23 | $-0.56 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $83.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $121.2M | $76.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $118.1M | $83.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $119.9M | $79.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $116.4M | $69.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $122.3M | $68.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $106.9M | $58.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $93.6M | $53.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-31.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.5M | $-29.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.8M | $-21.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.4M | $-19.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.1M | $-24.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.8M | $-18.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.4M | $-21.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.0M | $-25.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | 64.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 47.0% | 60.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 47.8% | 64.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 45.7% | 65.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 40.8% | 63.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 41.0% | 64.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 45.6% | 63.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 52.8% | 59.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | -4.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.7% | -40.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.3% | -27.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.5% | -28.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.8% | -39.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.8% | -28.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.8% | -38.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.4% | -50.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | -38.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.2% | -39.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.6% | -25.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.2% | -24.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.1% | -35.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.7% | -27.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.0% | -35.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.4% | -48.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | $-0.56 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.23 | $-0.54 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.24 | $-0.38 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.23 | $-0.35 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.22 | $-0.45 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.18 | $-0.34 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.20 | $-0.40 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.19 | $-0.50 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $11.6M | $245.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $51.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $215.3M | $347.7M |
| Total Assets | $369.1M | $487.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.15× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $245.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $11.6M | $286.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.2M | $294.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.4M | $302.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.5M | $316.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.4M | $333.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.3M | $196.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.5M | $214.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $51.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $51.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $51.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $51.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $51.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $51.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $51.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $51.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $347.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $215.3M | $365.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $203.2M | $380.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $208.7M | $385.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $196.3M | $389.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $189.2M | $402.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $182.6M | $241.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $172.0M | $251.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | $487.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $369.1M | $508.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $375.1M | $511.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $372.4M | $513.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $358.8M | $519.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $333.2M | $534.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $346.9M | $374.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $325.5M | $374.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.15× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.14× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.14× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.13× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.13× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.13× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.21× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.20× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-526.0K | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-2.8M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -2.3% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.9% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.07× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $70.1M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-526.0K | $-10.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $38.0M | $-6.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.3M | $-15.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.6M | $-17.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-12.1M | $-32.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.0M | $-18.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.2M | $-15.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-2.8M | $-12.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $36.0M | $-9.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.2M | $-17.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.8M | $-18.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-14.0M | $-33.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.2M | $-19.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $20.3M | $-16.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -2.3% | -15.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 30.5% | -11.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.3% | -22.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.0% | -27.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -11.4% | -49.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.9% | -32.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.7% | -31.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.9% | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.7% | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.8% | 3.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.6% | 2.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.5% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.7% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.1% | 2.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.07× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.86× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.60× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.07× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.09× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.45× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.71× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LQDT
| RSCG | $82.0M | 68% |
| Gov Deals | $22.3M | 18% |
| CAG | $11.5M | 9% |
| Machinio And Software Solutions Corporation | $5.5M | 5% |
PRCT
| Handpieces and other consumables | $43.0M | 52% |
| System sales and rentals | $23.4M | 28% |
| Other | $11.1M | 13% |
| Service | $5.6M | 7% |
